Literature DB >> 20046943

The influence of visual feedback and register changes on sign language production: A kinematic study with deaf signers.

Karen Emmorey1, Nelly Gertsberg, Franco Korpics, Charles E Wright.   

Abstract

Speakers monitor their speech output by listening to their own voice. However, signers do not look directly at their hands and cannot see their own face. We investigated the importance of a visual perceptual loop for sign language monitoring by examining whether changes in visual input alter sign production. Deaf signers produced American Sign Language (ASL) signs within a carrier phrase under five conditions: blindfolded, wearing tunnel-vision goggles, normal (citation) signing, shouting, and informal signing. Three-dimensional movement trajectories were obtained using an Optotrak Certus system. Informally produced signs were shorter with less vertical movement. Shouted signs were displaced forward and to the right and were produced within a larger volume of signing space, with greater velocity, greater distance traveled, and a longer duration. Tunnel vision caused signers to produce less movement within the vertical dimension of signing space, but blind and citation signing did not differ significantly on any measure, except duration. Thus, signers do not "sign louder" when they cannot see themselves, but they do alter their sign production when vision is restricted. We hypothesize that visual feedback serves primarily to fine-tune the size of signing space rather than as input to a comprehension-based monitor.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20046943      PMCID: PMC2726740          DOI: 10.1017/S0142716408090085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist        ISSN: 0142-7164


  12 in total

1.  Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension.

Authors:  A Churchill; B Hopkins; L Rönnqvist; S Vogt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation.

Authors:  J A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping.

Authors:  Luis F Schettino; Sergei V Adamovich; Howard Poizner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual Information and Object Size in the Control of Reaching.

Authors:  N. E. Berthier; R. K. Clifton; V. Gullapalli; D. D. McCall; D. J. Robin
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Modifications in sign under conditions of impeded visibility.

Authors:  S L Naeve; G M Siegel; J L Clay
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-12

6.  Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses.

Authors:  W V Summers; D B Pisoni; R H Bernacki; R I Pedlow; M A Stokes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced in noise and while wearing an oxygen mask.

Authors:  Z S Bond; T J Moore; B Gable
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Monitoring and self-repair in speech.

Authors:  W J Levelt
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1983-07

9.  Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions.

Authors:  J L ELman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The effects of auditory and visual interference on speech and sign.

Authors:  G M Siegel; J L Clay; S L Naeve
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-12
View more
  7 in total

1.  Visual feedback and self-monitoring of sign language.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Rain Bosworth; Tanya Kraljic
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  The use of visual feedback during signing: evidence from signers with impaired vision.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Franco Korpics; Karen Petronio
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2008-05-20

3.  Direction asymmetries in spoken and signed language interpreting.

Authors:  Brenda Nicodemus; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2013-07

4.  Directionality in ASL-English interpreting: Accuracy and articulation quality in L1 and L2.

Authors:  Brenda Nicodemus; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Interpreting (Amst)       Date:  2015

5.  Morphology of the insula in relation to hearing status and sign language experience.

Authors:  John S Allen; Karen Emmorey; Joel Bruss; Hanna Damasio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  How sensory-motor systems impact the neural organization for language: direct contrasts between spoken and signed language.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Stephen McCullough; Sonya Mehta; Thomas J Grabowski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-27

Review 7.  On language acquisition in speech and sign: development of combinatorial structure in both modalities.

Authors:  Gary Morgan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.