Literature DB >> 20161058

Visual feedback and self-monitoring of sign language.

Karen Emmorey1, Rain Bosworth, Tanya Kraljic.   

Abstract

The perceptual loop theory of self-monitoring posits that auditory speech output is parsed by the comprehension system. For sign language, however, visual input from one's own signing is distinct from visual input received from another's signing. Two experiments investigated the role of visual feedback in the production of American Sign Language (ASL). Experiment 1 revealed that signers were poor at recognizing ASL signs when viewed as they would appear during self-produced signing. Experiment 2 showed that the absence or blurring of visual feedback did not affect production performance when deaf signers learned to reproduce signs from Russian Sign Language, and production performance of hearing non-signers was slightly worse with visual feedback. Signers may rely primarily on somatosensory feedback when monitoring language output, and if the perceptual loop theory is to be maintained, the comprehension system must be able to parse a somatosensory signal as well as an external perceptual signal for both sign and speech.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20161058      PMCID: PMC2747116          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  28 in total

Review 1.  Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models.

Authors:  A Postma
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-11-16

2.  Learning to produce speech with an altered vocal tract: the role of auditory feedback.

Authors:  Jeffery A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Language lateralization in a bimanual language.

Authors:  David P Corina; Lucila San Jose-Robertson; Andre Guillemin; Julia High; Allen R Braun
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study.

Authors:  G Buccino; F Binkofski; G R Fink; L Fadiga; L Fogassi; V Gallese; R J Seitz; K Zilles; G Rizzolatti; H J Freund
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 5.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed.

Authors:  Bruno Galantucci; Carol A Fowler; M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

6.  Halting in Single Word Production: A Test of the Perceptual Loop Theory of Speech Monitoring.

Authors:  L Robert Slevc; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  A "word length effect" for sign language: further evidence for the role of language in structuring working memory.

Authors:  M Wilson; K Emmorey
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-05

8.  A visuospatial "phonological loop" in working memory: evidence from American Sign Language.

Authors:  M Wilson; K Emmorey
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-05

9.  Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; S J Goodbody; M Husain
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 10.  The perceptual characteristics of voice-hallucinations in deaf people: insights into the nature of subvocal thought and sensory feedback loops.

Authors:  Joanna R Atkinson
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 9.306

View more
  12 in total

1.  Pre-output Language Monitoring in Sign Production.

Authors:  Stephanie K Riès; Linda Nadalet; Soren Mickelsen; Megan Mott; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The sign superiority effect: Lexical status facilitates peripheral handshape identification for deaf signers.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Emily Johnson; Amy M Lieberman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Direction asymmetries in spoken and signed language interpreting.

Authors:  Brenda Nicodemus; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2013-07

4.  Short-term memory stages in sign vs. speech: the source of the serial span discrepancy.

Authors:  Matthew L Hall; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-03-29

5.  Directionality in ASL-English interpreting: Accuracy and articulation quality in L1 and L2.

Authors:  Brenda Nicodemus; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Interpreting (Amst)       Date:  2015

6.  The neural circuits recruited for the production of signs and fingerspelled words.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Sonya Mehta; Stephen McCullough; Thomas J Grabowski
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Shadowing in the manual modality.

Authors:  Chris Brozdowski; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2020-06-09

8.  The signing body: extensive sign language practice shapes the size of hands and face.

Authors:  Laura Mora; Anna Sedda; Teresa Esteban; Gianna Cocchini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  How sensory-motor systems impact the neural organization for language: direct contrasts between spoken and signed language.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Stephen McCullough; Sonya Mehta; Thomas J Grabowski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-27

10.  Turn-timing in signed conversations: coordinating stroke-to-stroke turn boundaries.

Authors:  Connie de Vos; Francisco Torreira; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.