Literature DB >> 18495656

The use of visual feedback during signing: evidence from signers with impaired vision.

Karen Emmorey1, Franco Korpics, Karen Petronio.   

Abstract

The role of visual feedback during the production of American Sign Language was investigated by comparing the size of signing space during conversations and narrative monologues for normally sighted signers, signers with tunnel vision due to Usher syndrome, and functionally blind signers. The interlocutor for all groups was a normally sighted deaf person. Signers with tunnel vision produced a greater proportion of signs near the face than blind and normally sighted signers, who did not differ from each other. Both groups of visually impaired signers produced signs within a smaller signing space for conversations than for monologues, but we hypothesize that they did so for different reasons. Signers with tunnel vision may align their signing space with that of their interlocutor. In contrast, blind signers may enhance proprioceptive feedback by producing signs within an enlarged signing space for monologues, which do not require switching between tactile and visual signing. Overall, we hypothesize that signers use visual feedback to phonetically calibrate the dimensions of signing space, rather than to monitor language output.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18495656      PMCID: PMC2637109          DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enn020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ        ISSN: 1081-4159


  8 in total

1.  Visual field asymmetries for motion processing in deaf and hearing signers.

Authors:  Rain G Bosworth; Karen R Dobkins
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models.

Authors:  A Postma
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-11-16

3.  Visual attention to the periphery is enhanced in congenitally deaf individuals.

Authors:  D Bavelier; A Tomann; C Hutton; T Mitchell; D Corina; G Liu; H Neville
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation.

Authors:  Michael E J Masson
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2003-09

Review 5.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.

Authors:  Martin J Pickering; Simon Garrod
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.579

6.  Interpreting for deaf-blind students: factors to consider.

Authors:  K Petronio
Journal:  Am Ann Deaf       Date:  1988-07

7.  The effects of auditory and visual interference on speech and sign.

Authors:  G M Siegel; J L Clay; S L Naeve
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-12

8.  The influence of visual feedback and register changes on sign language production: A kinematic study with deaf signers.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Nelly Gertsberg; Franco Korpics; Charles E Wright
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2009-01-01
  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  Visual feedback and self-monitoring of sign language.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Rain Bosworth; Tanya Kraljic
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  The sign superiority effect: Lexical status facilitates peripheral handshape identification for deaf signers.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Emily Johnson; Amy M Lieberman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Direction asymmetries in spoken and signed language interpreting.

Authors:  Brenda Nicodemus; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2013-07

4.  Directionality in ASL-English interpreting: Accuracy and articulation quality in L1 and L2.

Authors:  Brenda Nicodemus; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Interpreting (Amst)       Date:  2015

5.  The neural circuits recruited for the production of signs and fingerspelled words.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Sonya Mehta; Stephen McCullough; Thomas J Grabowski
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  The influence of visual feedback and register changes on sign language production: A kinematic study with deaf signers.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Nelly Gertsberg; Franco Korpics; Charles E Wright
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2009-01-01

7.  Shadowing in the manual modality.

Authors:  Chris Brozdowski; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2020-06-09

8.  Morphology of the insula in relation to hearing status and sign language experience.

Authors:  John S Allen; Karen Emmorey; Joel Bruss; Hanna Damasio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  How sensory-motor systems impact the neural organization for language: direct contrasts between spoken and signed language.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Stephen McCullough; Sonya Mehta; Thomas J Grabowski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.