Literature DB >> 20016885

Complications and outcomes following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective study of 3,241 patients.

Sepehr Salem1, Abdolrasoul Mehrsai, Hamed Zartab, Nematollah Shahdadi, Gholamreza Pourmand.   

Abstract

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has become the least invasive treatment modality with high success rates for urinary calculi; however, its established efficacy has been associated with a number of side effects and complications. This study sought to further evaluate the incidence rate and management of the post-SWL complications and also the efficiency of procedure in a large scale of patients. During a 51-month period, 3,241 consecutive adult patients with the mean age of 38.1 years (range 15-75) and urinary calculi (>or=4 mm) underwent SWL at our referral center and were followed for 3 months prospectively. Overall, 3,614 stones [kidneys (83.5%), ureters (15.8%) and bladder (0.7%)] in 3,241 patients were treated requiring 7,245 SWL sessions. Stone-free state occurred in 71.5% calculi and success rate in 79.8% patients. The re-treatment was necessary in 37.2% patients. Auxiliary procedure and efficiency quotient were 5.6% and 0.50, respectively. SWL success rate decreased as the stone size increased (P < 0.0001). The stone-free rate was correlated with the location of the stone. During the study period, 4,075 complications occurred in our patients. Colicky pain (40%) was the most frequent symptom followed by gross hematuria (32%) and steinstrasse (24.2%). Symptomatic bacteriuria developed in 9.7% patients; Escherichia coli (30.4%) was the most causative organism. In conclusion, the complication rate following SWL was high in our study; however, the majority was mild and managed conservatively or with the minimal intervention. Moreover, the management of urinary calculi in adults using SWL was proved to be safe and efficient, particularly for ureteral stones <10 mm, renal pelvic stones <20 mm, and bladder stones <30 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20016885     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-009-0247-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  31 in total

Review 1.  Limitations of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Sanjeev Madaan; Adrian D Joyce
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  Primary extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of staghorn renal calculi.

Authors:  M P Wirth; M Theiss; H G Frohmüller
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association.

Authors:  J W Segura; G M Preminger; D G Assimos; S P Dretler; R I Kahn; J E Lingeman; J N Macaluso
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Blood pressure changes following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and other forms of treatment for nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  J E Lingeman; J R Woods; P D Toth
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-04-04       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones using the Dornier lithotriptor MFL5000.

Authors:  N Fujimoto; M Kyo; Y Ichikawa; S Nagano
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Arterial blood pressure following different types of urinary stone therapy. Presented at the 8th European Symposium on Urolithiasis, Parma, Italy, 1999.

Authors:  W L Strohmaier; J Schmidt; S Lahme; K H Bichler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Diabetes mellitus and hypertension associated with shock wave lithotripsy of renal and proximal ureteral stones at 19 years of followup.

Authors:  Amy E Krambeck; Matthew T Gettman; Audrey L Rohlinger; Christine M Lohse; David E Patterson; Joseph W Segura
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Risk factors for the formation of a steinstrasse after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a statistical model.

Authors:  Khaled Madbouly; Khaled Z Sheir; Emad Elsobky; Ibrahim Eraky; Mahmoud Kenawy
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Management of ureteric stones.

Authors:  Theodore Anagnostou; David Tolley
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  The incidence of urinary tract infection in patients without bacteriuria who underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  R Raz; A Zoabi; M Sudarsky; J Shental
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  10 in total

1.  Simultaneous vs staged treatment of urolithiasis in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Boyd R Viers; Matthew K Tollefson; David E Patterson; Matthew T Gettman; Amy E Krambeck
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 2.  How to maximize the efficacy of shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Neophytos Petrides; Safiyah Ismail; Faqar Anjum; Seshadri Sriprasad
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-30

3.  Risk factors for formation of steinstrasse after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric renal calculi: a multivariate analysis model.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Assmy; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Mohammed M Elsaadany; Samer El-Halwagy; Khaled Z Sheir
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Hospital admission for treatment of complications after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones: a study of risk factors.

Authors:  Ahmed R El-Nahas; Diaa-Eldin Taha; Mohamed M Elsaadany; Mohamed H Zahran; Mohamed Hassan; Khaled Z Sheir
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Does lithotripsy increase stone recurrence? A comparative study between extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and non-fragmenting percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Assmy; Ahmed M Harraz; Yasser Eldemerdash; Mohammed Elkhamesy; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Ahmed M Elshal; Khaled Z Sheir
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2016-04-03

6.  Hypovolemic Shock Caused by Massive Renal Hematoma After a Third Consecutive Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Session: A Case Report.

Authors:  Loic Sermeus; Kathy Vander Eeckt; Dieter Ost; Marcel Van Den Branden
Journal:  J Endourol Case Rep       Date:  2016-12-01

7.  Ureteral stenting can be a negative predictor for successful outcome following shock wave lithotripsy in patients with ureteral stones.

Authors:  Dong Hyuk Kang; Kang Su Cho; Won Sik Ham; Doo Yong Chung; Jong Kyou Kwon; Young Deuk Choi; Joo Yong Lee
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-10-24

8.  Immediate versus delayed shockwave lithotripsy for inaccessible stones after uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Esam A E Desoky; Amr M Fawzi; Ahmed Sakr; Ahmed Eliwa; Ehab R El Sayed; Diab El Sayed; Asharf M S Shahin; Emad A Salem; Hussien M Kamel; Waleed Shabana; Mostafa Kamel
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2016-12-28

9.  Factors Affecting the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Urinary Stone Treatment.

Authors:  Sanjay Shinde; Younis Al Balushi; Medhat Hossny; Sachin Jose; Salma Al Busaidy
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2018-05

10.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for management of residual stones after ureterolithotripsy versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Zhichao Huang; Xiaokun Zhao; Lei Zhang; Zhaohui Zhong; Ran Xu; Lianping Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.