Literature DB >> 17285020

Limitations of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Sanjeev Madaan1, Adrian D Joyce.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is the preferred modality for the treatment of renal and upper ureteric calculi. The present review focuses on the limitations of ESWL, where recent developments have tried to identify patients who are unlikely to succeed with ESWL and where improvements in shock wave delivery may increase successful stone fragmentation. RECENT
FINDINGS: Evaluation of patients prior to ESWL is especially important, and the use of imaging in the decision process, with the use of computed tomography attenuation values and skin-to-stone distance, can help improve our ability to identify suitable patients for shock wave treatment. Continued research into the methods of shock wave delivery techniques and lithotripter designs will help achieve better stone fragmentation rates with reduced side effects.
SUMMARY: The importance of traditional factors in predicting ESWL success, such as stone size, location, composition and renal anatomy, are well known. More recently, authors have created nomograms to predict stone-free outcome after ESWL. Others have used the information obtained from computed tomography to predict stone comminution. In addition, modifications in shock wave delivery by altering shock rate and voltage have been researched in an effort to improve shock wave efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17285020     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32802b70bc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  12 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of stone composition in the management of urinary stones.

Authors:  Kittinut Kijvikai; J J M de la Rosette
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Tamsulosin and doxazosin as adjunctive therapy following shock-wave lithotripsy of renal calculi: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Osama M Zaytoun; Rachid Yakoubi; Abdel Rahman M Zahran; Khaled Fouda; Essam Marzouk; Salah Gaafar; Khaled Fareed
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-08-12

3.  Complications and outcomes following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective study of 3,241 patients.

Authors:  Sepehr Salem; Abdolrasoul Mehrsai; Hamed Zartab; Nematollah Shahdadi; Gholamreza Pourmand
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-12-17

4.  Comparison of two different running models for the shock wave lithotripsy machine in Taipei City Hospital: self-support versus outsourcing cooperation.

Authors:  Chi-Yi Huang; Shiou-Sheng Chen; Li-Kuei Chen
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-07-14

5.  Comparative analysis of upper ureteral stones (> 15 mm) treated with retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy.

Authors:  YunYan Wang; JianQuan Hou; DuanGai Wen; Jun OuYang; JunSong Meng; HaiJun Zhuang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  The concentration of Zn, Mg and Mn in calcium oxalate monohydrate stones appears to interfere with their fragility in ESWL therapy.

Authors:  Mehmet Turgut; Ibrahim Unal; Asiye Berber; Temir Ali Demir; Fezan Mutlu; Yüksel Aydar
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2008-01-05

Review 7.  Recent finding and new technologies in nephrolitiasis: a review of the recent literature.

Authors:  Marco Rosa; Paolo Usai; Roberto Miano; Fernando J Kim; Enrico Finazzi Agrò; Pierluigi Bove; Salvatore Micali
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Management of Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments following Shock Wave Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Elisa Cicerello; Franco Merlo; Luigi Maccatrozzo
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-05-31

9.  Elemental Content of Calcium Oxalate Stones from a Canine Model of Urinary Stone Disease.

Authors:  David W Killilea; Jodi L Westropp; Ryoji Shiraki; Matthew Mellema; Jennifer Larsen; Arnold J Kahn; Pankaj Kapahi; Thomas Chi; Marshall L Stoller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ureteroscopic treatment of larger renal calculi (>2 cm).

Authors:  Demetrius H Bagley; Kelly A Healy; Nir Kleinmann
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.