Literature DB >> 25144730

An exponential growth of computational phantom research in radiation protection, imaging, and radiotherapy: a review of the fifty-year history.

X George Xu1.   

Abstract

Radiation dose calculation using models of the human anatomy has been a subject of great interest to radiation protection, medical imaging, and radiotherapy. However, early pioneers of this field did not foresee the exponential growth of research activity as observed today. This review article walks the reader through the history of the research and development in this field of study which started some 50 years ago. This review identifies a clear progression of computational phantom complexity which can be denoted by three distinct generations. The first generation of stylized phantoms, representing a grouping of less than dozen models, was initially developed in the 1960s at Oak Ridge National Laboratory to calculate internal doses from nuclear medicine procedures. Despite their anatomical simplicity, these computational phantoms were the best tools available at the time for internal/external dosimetry, image evaluation, and treatment dose evaluations. A second generation of a large number of voxelized phantoms arose rapidly in the late 1980s as a result of the increased availability of tomographic medical imaging and computers. Surprisingly, the last decade saw the emergence of the third generation of phantoms which are based on advanced geometries called boundary representation (BREP) in the form of Non-Uniform Rational B-Splines (NURBS) or polygonal meshes. This new class of phantoms now consists of over 287 models including those used for non-ionizing radiation applications. This review article aims to provide the reader with a general understanding of how the field of computational phantoms came about and the technical challenges it faced at different times. This goal is achieved by defining basic geometry modeling techniques and by analyzing selected phantoms in terms of geometrical features and dosimetric problems to be solved. The rich historical information is summarized in four tables that are aided by highlights in the text on how some of the most well-known phantoms were developed and used in practice. Some of the information covered in this review has not been previously reported, for example, the CAM and CAF phantoms developed in 1970s for space radiation applications. The author also clarifies confusion about 'population-average' prospective dosimetry needed for radiological protection under the current ICRP radiation protection system and 'individualized' retrospective dosimetry often performed for medical physics studies. To illustrate the impact of computational phantoms, a section of this article is devoted to examples from the author's own research group. Finally the author explains an unexpected finding during the course of preparing for this article that the phantoms from the past 50 years followed a pattern of exponential growth. The review ends on a brief discussion of future research needs (a supplementary file '3DPhantoms.pdf' to figure 15 is available for download that will allow a reader to interactively visualize the phantoms in 3D).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25144730      PMCID: PMC4169876          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/18/R233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  172 in total

1.  SAR in a child voxel phantom from exposure to wireless computer networks (Wi-Fi).

Authors:  R P Findlay; P J Dimbylow
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Dose evaluation of selective collimation effect in cephalography by measurement and Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Boram Lee; Gwisoon Shin; Sunjung Kang; Boram Shin; Ilhong Back; Hyok Park; Changseo Park; Jeongwoo Lee; Wonho Lee; Jonghak Choi; Ryeonghwang Park; Youhyun Kim
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Monte Carlo calculation of imaging doses from diagnostic multidetector CT and kilovoltage cone-beam CT as part of prostate cancer treatment plans.

Authors:  Aiping Ding; Jianwei Gu; Alexei V Trofimov; X George Xu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Evaluation of cardiac cone-beam single photon emission computed tomography using observer performance experiments and receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  B M Tsui; J A Terry; G T Gullberg
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Comparison of organ doses for patients undergoing balloon brachytherapy of the breast with HDR 192Ir or electronic sources using monte carlo simulations in a heterogeneous human phantom.

Authors:  Matthew M Mille; X George Xu; Mark J Rivard
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients from monoenergetic neutrons below 20 MeV based on the VIP-man anatomical model.

Authors:  A Bozkurt; T C Chao; X G Xu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Tomographic physical phantom of the newborn child with real-time dosimetry I. Methods and techniques for construction.

Authors:  A K Jones; T A Simon; W E Bolch; M M Holman; D E Hintenlang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  SAR calculations from 20 MHz to 6 GHz in the University of Florida newborn voxel phantom and their implications for dosimetry.

Authors:  Peter Dimbylow; Wesley Bolch; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Monte Carlo simulations for external neutron dosimetry based on the visible Chinese human phantom.

Authors:  Guozhi Zhang; Qian Liu; Qingming Luo
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Mathematical models of the embryo and fetus for use in radiological protection.

Authors:  Jing Chen
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.316

View more
  58 in total

1.  Updated estimates of typical effective doses for common CT examinations in the UK following the 2011 national review.

Authors:  Paul C Shrimpton; Jan T M Jansen; John D Harrison
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The development of a population of 4D pediatric XCAT phantoms for imaging research and optimization.

Authors:  W P Segars; Hannah Norris; Gregory M Sturgeon; Yakun Zhang; Jason Bond; Anum Minhas; Daniel J Tward; J T Ratnanather; M I Miller; D Frush; E Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dosimetric assessment of the exposure of radiotherapy patients due to cone-beam CT procedures.

Authors:  Mariana Baptista; Salvatore Di Maria; Sandra Vieira; Joana Santos; Joana Pereira; Miguel Pereira; Pedro Vaz
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Scattered Dose Calculations and Measurements in a Life-Like Mouse Phantom.

Authors:  David Welch; Leah Turner; Michael Speiser; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  DukeSim: A Realistic, Rapid, and Scanner-Specific Simulation Framework in Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Ehsan Abadi; Brian Harrawood; Shobhit Sharma; Anuj Kapadia; William P Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 6.  Task-based measures of image quality and their relation to radiation dose and patient risk.

Authors:  Harrison H Barrett; Kyle J Myers; Christoph Hoeschen; Matthew A Kupinski; Mark P Little
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Advances in Computational Human Phantoms and Their Applications in Biomedical Engineering - A Topical Review.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kainz; Esra Neufeld; Wesley E Bolch; Christian G Graff; Chan Hyeong Kim; Niels Kuster; Bryn Lloyd; Tina Morrison; Paul Segars; Yeon Soo Yeom; Maria Zankl; X George Xu; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2019-01

8.  Development of a paediatric head voxel model database for dosimetric applications.

Authors:  Andreas Stratis; Nathan Touyz; Guozhi Zhang; Reinhilde Jacobs; Ria Bogaerts; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Comparison of photon organ and effective dose coefficients for PIMAL stylized phantom in bent positions in standard irradiation geometries.

Authors:  Shaheen Dewji; K Lisa Reed; Mauritius Hiller
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  Synthetic breast phantoms from patient based eigenbreasts.

Authors:  Gregory M Sturgeon; Subok Park; William Paul Segars; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.