Erin L Sutfin1, Beth A Reboussin, Thomas P McCoy, Mark Wolfson. 1. Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA. esutfin@wfubmc.edu
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: College smokers are often considered to be one homogenous group, those reporting smoking on at least one of the past 30 days. However, considerable heterogeneity exists among college students who report current smoking. The aim of this paper is to characterize disparate patterns of smoking among college students using latent class analysis (LCA). METHODS: The sample consisted of 1,102 past-month smokers from 10 colleges in North Carolina who completed a Web-based survey. LCA was used to create homogeneous groups of smokers with similar patterns defined by multiple indicators of smoking behavior, including quantity and frequency of smoking, smoking contexts, and weekly patterns of smoking. RESULTS: Five subclasses of smokers were identified: "heavy smokers" (28%), moderate smokers (22%), social smokers (19%), puffers (26%), and no-context smokers (4%). Demographic characteristics that varied among these subgroups were year in school, Greek membership, and residence location. Puffers were more likely to be younger students than heavy and social smokers, suggesting a transition from experimentation to regular use over time. Social smokers and puffers were more likely to be involved in Greek organizations than were heavy and moderate smokers. Moderate and social smokers were more likely to be current drinkers and to have engaged in binge drinking in the past month than were heavy smokers. This finding suggests that, for moderate and social smokers, a strong relationship exists between alcohol and tobacco use. DISCUSSION: The results highlight the heterogeneity of college student smokers and underscore the need for targeted interventions.
INTRODUCTION: College smokers are often considered to be one homogenous group, those reporting smoking on at least one of the past 30 days. However, considerable heterogeneity exists among college students who report current smoking. The aim of this paper is to characterize disparate patterns of smoking among college students using latent class analysis (LCA). METHODS: The sample consisted of 1,102 past-month smokers from 10 colleges in North Carolina who completed a Web-based survey. LCA was used to create homogeneous groups of smokers with similar patterns defined by multiple indicators of smoking behavior, including quantity and frequency of smoking, smoking contexts, and weekly patterns of smoking. RESULTS: Five subclasses of smokers were identified: "heavy smokers" (28%), moderate smokers (22%), social smokers (19%), puffers (26%), and no-context smokers (4%). Demographic characteristics that varied among these subgroups were year in school, Greek membership, and residence location. Puffers were more likely to be younger students than heavy and social smokers, suggesting a transition from experimentation to regular use over time. Social smokers and puffers were more likely to be involved in Greek organizations than were heavy and moderate smokers. Moderate and social smokers were more likely to be current drinkers and to have engaged in binge drinking in the past month than were heavy smokers. This finding suggests that, for moderate and social smokers, a strong relationship exists between alcohol and tobacco use. DISCUSSION: The results highlight the heterogeneity of college student smokers and underscore the need for targeted interventions.
Authors: Pascale M Wortley; Corinne G Husten; Angela Trosclair; Jeff Chrismon; Linda L Pederson Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: David W Wetter; Susan L Kenford; Samuel K Welsch; Stevens S Smith; Rachel T Fouladi; Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Arnold H Levinson; Shelly Campo; Jan Gascoigne; Olivia Jolly; Armen Zakharyan; Zung Vu Tran Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Carla J Berg; Pamela M Ling; Rashelle B Hayes; Erin Berg; Nikki Nollen; Eric Nehl; Won S Choi; Jasjit S Ahluwalia Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2011-12-07
Authors: Andrea C Villanti; Amanda L Johnson; Jessica M Rath; Valerie Williams; Donna M Vallone; David B Abrams; Donald Hedeker; Robin J Mermelstein Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Erin L Sutfin; Beth A Reboussin; Beata Debinski; Kimberly G Wagoner; John Spangler; Mark Wolfson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Arielle S Selya; Lisa C Dierker; Jennifer S Rose; Donald Hedeker; Robin J Mermelstein Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2012-02-25 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Hetal S Vig; Joanne Armstrong; Brian L Egleston; Carla Mazar; Michele Toscano; Angela R Bradbury; Mary B Daly; Neal J Meropol Journal: Genet Test Mol Biomarkers Date: 2009-12