Literature DB >> 19997723

Is high diuresis an important prerequisite for successful SWL-disintegration of ureteral stones?

Hans-Göran Tiselius1, Trine Aronsen, Stina Bohgard, Marita Fredriksson, Elsie-Marie Jonason, Monica Olsson, Kristina Sjöström.   

Abstract

A randomised comparison was made between high and normal diuresis during the primary session of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for removal of ureteral stones. High diuresis was accomplished by pressure infusion of approximately 1 L of Ringer acetate solution together with 20 mg of furosemide during the 30-40 min treatment session (Group D). These patients also had a bladder catheter. Patients in Group 0 had a normal diuresis and no bladder catheter. The mean (SD) number of treatment sessions for the 65 patients in Group D were 1.26 (0.51) and for the 60 patients from Group 0 1.35 (0.84) [p > 0.10]. 51 (78%) and 46 (77%) patients in Group D and Group 0, respectively, required only one SWL session. Stones were located in the proximal, mid and distal ureter in 22, 9, and 29 of the patients in Group D and in 22, 5, and 38 in Group 0. No difference in treatment outcome was observed with regard to stone localisation. The stone treatment index (STI(GR)) calculated for Group D and Group 0 were 4.77 and 4.70, respectively. In conclusion there was no obvious advantage of using a forced diuresis during the primary SWL-session for treating patients with ureteral stones. Although a high diuresis and bladder catheter might be beneficial in certain complicated cases, in most situations it seems appropriate to omit this step.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19997723     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-009-0241-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  12 in total

1.  Current management of urolithiasis: progress or regress?

Authors:  Kurt Kerbl; Jamil Rehman; Jaime Landman; David Lee; Chandru Sundaram; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-05-29

3.  The treatment of 100 consecutive patients with ureteral calculi in a British stone center.

Authors:  M J Coptcoat; D R Webb; M J Kellett; H N Whitfield; J E Wickham
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Composition and clinically determined hardness of urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Ida Ringdén; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007

5.  Effect of diuresis on extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of ureteric calculi.

Authors:  T A Azm; H Higazy
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002

6.  How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Anesthesia-free extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteral stones without a ureteral catheter.

Authors:  H G Tiselius
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Effect of diuretics on ureteral stone therapy with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  A Zomorrodi; J Golivandan; J Samady
Journal:  Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl       Date:  2008-05

9.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones: clinical experience and experimental findings.

Authors:  S C Mueller; D Wilbert; J W Thueroff; P Alken
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Stone treatment index: a mathematical summary of the procedure for removal of stones from the urinary tract.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Ida Ringdén
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.942

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-06-27

Review 2.  Shockwave lithotripsy: techniques for improving outcomes.

Authors:  Tadeusz Kroczak; Kymora B Scotland; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Does the use of doxazosin influence the success of SWL in the treatment of upper ureteral stones? A multicenter, prospective and randomized study.

Authors:  Ferhat Ateş; Bilal Eryıldırım; Metin Ishak Öztürk; Turgay Turan; Cenk Gürbüz; Mete Oğuz Ekinci; Asıf Yıldırım; Cemal Göktaş; Temuçin Şenkul; Kemal Sarıca
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-01-07

4.  Furosemide improves the stone clearance rate of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for kidney stones but not ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Yao; Ke Li; ShiQuan Huang; XueSong Cheng; XiaoLiang Jiang
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-10-15

Review 5.  How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?

Authors:  Christian G Chaussy; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 3.436

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.