Literature DB >> 22736393

Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.

Hans-Göran Tiselius1, Christian G Chaussy.   

Abstract

The present review summarizes the most important considerations and steps for an optimal result of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. The relationship between shockwave path, geometry and anatomical conditions is of utmost importance. Selection of appropriate treatment variables in terms of shockwave number, power and frequency, is an important prerequisite for proper disintegration and prevention of complications. Several supportive measures such as inversion therapy, citrate therapy, high diuresis, α-receptor antagonists, chemolysis and recurrence preventive measures are important parts of the management of this group of patients in order to avoid problems with residual fragments and new stone formation. Proper understanding of these factors as well as of the physics of shockwaves is necessary for a successful application of this non-invasive technology treatment concept.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22736393     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-012-0485-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  111 in total

1.  Cavitation bubble cluster activity in the breakage of kidney stones by lithotripter shockwaves.

Authors:  Yuriy A Pishchalnikov; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey; James C Williams; Robin O Cleveland; Tim Colonius; Lawrence A Crum; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy.

Authors:  Yuri A Pishchalnikov; Joshua S Neucks; R Jason VonDerHaar; Irina V Pishchalnikova; James C Williams; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Long-term results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does prophylactic medical stone management make a difference?

Authors:  Dorit E Zilberman; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  [Painless extra-corporal shock wave lithotripsy using the HM3 Dornier lithotripter].

Authors:  N Fischer; H Rübben; S Hofsäss; B Forssmann; B Schockenhof; G Giani
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney.

Authors:  Anup Shah; Jonathan D Harper; Bryan W Cunitz; Yak-Nam Wang; Marla Paun; Julianna C Simon; Wei Lu; Peter J Kaczkowski; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Efficacy and treatment outcome of a new electromagnetic lithotripter for upper urinary tract calculi.

Authors:  Christian Seitz; Thomas Martini; Lukas Berner; Diego Signorello; Andrea Galantini; Armin Pycha
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in prepubertal children: 22-year experience at a single institution with a single lithotriptor.

Authors:  Ezekiel H Landau; Ofer Z Shenfeld; Dov Pode; Amos Shapiro; Shimon Meretyk; Giora Katz; Ran Katz; Mordechai Duvdevani; Benjamin Hardak; Helio Cipele; Guy Hidas; Vladimir Yutkin; Ofer N Gofrit
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Oral diclofenac in the prophylactic treatment of recurrent renal colic. A double-blind comparison with placebo.

Authors:  E Laerum; O E Ommundsen; J E Grønseth; A Christiansen; H E Fagertun
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Limitation of shock-wave-induced renal tubular dysfunction by nifedipine.

Authors:  W L Strohmaier; J Koch; N Balk; D M Wilbert; K H Bichler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Long-term incidence and risk factors for recurrent stones following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy or percutaneous nephrostolithotomy/extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for infection related calculi.

Authors:  S B Streem
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Arguments for choosing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for removal of urinary tract stones.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  Engineering Better Lithotripters.

Authors:  Christian G Chaussy; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  The transgluteal approach to shockwave lithotripsy to treat distal ureter stones: a prospective, randomized, and multicenter study.

Authors:  Min Soo Choo; Jun Hyun Han; Jong Keun Kim; Tae Young Shin; Won Ki Lee; Sang Kon Lee; Seong Ho Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Shockwave lithotripsy: techniques for improving outcomes.

Authors:  Tadeusz Kroczak; Kymora B Scotland; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?

Authors:  Christian G Chaussy; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Ultrasonography Is Not Inferior to Fluoroscopy to Guide Extracorporeal Shock Waves during Treatment of Renal and Upper Ureteric Calculi: A Randomized Prospective Study.

Authors:  Jeroen Van Besien; Pieter Uvin; Isabeau Hermie; Thomas Tailly; Luc Merckx
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.