Literature DB >> 28105554

Engagement with Genetic Information and Uptake of Genetic Testing: the Role of Trust and Personal Cancer History.

Megan C Roberts1, Jennifer M Taber2, William M Klein2.   

Abstract

We used national survey data to (1) determine the extent to which individuals trust the sources from which they are most likely to receive information about cancer-related genetic tests (BRCA1/2, Lynch syndrome), (2) examine how level of trust for sources of genetic information might be related to cancer-related genetic testing uptake, and (3) determine whether key factors, such as cancer history and numeracy, moderate the latter association. We used cross-sectional data from the Health Information National Trends Survey. Our study sample included individuals who responded that they had heard or read about genetic tests (n = 1117). All analyses accounted for complex survey design. Although respondents trusted information from health professionals the most, they were significantly less likely to report hearing about genetic testing from such professionals than via television (p < 0.01). Regardless of source, higher levels of trust in the information source from which participants heard about genetic tests were associated with increased odds of genetic testing uptake, particularly among those with a personal cancer history. Numeracy was not associated with genetic testing uptake. Because health professionals were among the most trusted health information sources, they may serve as important brokers of genetic testing information for those with a personal cancer history.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic information; Genetic testing; Trust

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28105554     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-016-1160-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  33 in total

1.  Promoting health literacy research to reduce health disparities.

Authors:  Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Michael S Wolf
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010

2.  Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign.

Authors:  Barry D Weiss; Mary Z Mays; William Martz; Kelley Merriam Castro; Darren A DeWalt; Michael P Pignone; Joy Mockbee; Frank A Hale
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 3.  Health information needs, sources, and barriers of primary care patients to achieve patient-centered care: A literature review.

Authors:  Martina A Clarke; Joi L Moore; Linsey M Steege; Richelle J Koopman; Jeffery L Belden; Shannon M Canfield; Susan E Meadows; Susan G Elliott; Min Soon Kim
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian, Version 2.2015.

Authors:  Mary B Daly; Robert Pilarski; Jennifer E Axilbund; Michael Berry; Saundra S Buys; Beth Crawford; Meagan Farmer; Susan Friedman; Judy E Garber; Seema Khan; Catherine Klein; Wendy Kohlmann; Allison Kurian; Jennifer K Litton; Lisa Madlensky; P Kelly Marcom; Sofia D Merajver; Kenneth Offit; Tuya Pal; Huma Rana; Gwen Reiser; Mark E Robson; Kristen Mahoney Shannon; Elizabeth Swisher; Nicoleta C Voian; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Alison Whelan; Myra J Wick; Georgia L Wiesner; Mary Dwyer; Rashmi Kumar; Susan Darlow
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Trends in patient information preferences and acquisition.

Authors:  Nina Kowalczyk; Lisa J Draper
Journal:  Radiol Technol       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr

6.  Prevalence and correlates of receiving and sharing high-penetrance cancer genetic test results: findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; Christine Q Chang; Tram K Lam; Elizabeth M Gillanders; Jada G Hamilton; Sheri D Schully
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Communicating genetic and genomic information: health literacy and numeracy considerations.

Authors:  D H Lea; K A Kaphingst; D Bowen; I Lipkus; D W Hadley
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 8.  ASCO/SSO review of current role of risk-reducing surgery in common hereditary cancer syndromes.

Authors:  José G Guillem; William C Wood; Jeffrey F Moley; Andrew Berchuck; Beth Y Karlan; David G Mutch; Robert F Gagel; Jeffrey Weitzel; Monica Morrow; Barbara L Weber; Francis Giardiello; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; James Church; Stephen Gruber; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Public Awareness of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests: Findings from the 2013 U.S. Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Tanya Agurs-Collins; Rebecca Ferrer; Allison Ottenbacher; Erika A Waters; Mary E O'Connell; Jada G Hamilton
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Understanding of BRCA1/2 genetic tests results: the importance of objective and subjective numeracy.

Authors:  Yaniv Hanoch; Talya Miron-Shatz; Jonathan J Rolison; Elissa Ozanne
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  7 in total

1.  Assessing Genetic Literacy Awareness and Knowledge Gaps in the US Population: Results from the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Melinda Krakow; Chelsea L Ratcliff; Bradford W Hesse; Alexandra J Greenberg-Worisek
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Discussions about predictive genetic testing for Lynch syndrome: the role of health professionals and families in decisions to decline.

Authors:  Anaita Kanga-Parabia; Clara Gaff; Louisa Flander; Mark Jenkins; Louise A Keogh
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Communication of cancer-related genetic and genomic information: A landscape analysis of reviews.

Authors:  Emily B Peterson; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Anna Gaysynsky; Melinda Krakow; Ashley Elrick; Muin J Khoury; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  The FDA authorization of direct-to-consumer genetic testing for three BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants: a twitter analysis of the public's response.

Authors:  Megan C Roberts; Caitlin G Allen; Brittany L Andersen
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2019-09-17

5.  Employees' Views and Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Assessment of Voluntary Workplace Genomic Testing.

Authors:  Kunal Sanghavi; W Gregory Feero; Debra J H Mathews; Anya E R Prince; Lori Lyn Price; Edison T Liu; Kyle B Brothers; J Scott Roberts; Charles Lee
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Half of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants found on panel tests do not fulfil NHS testing criteria.

Authors:  Tala Andoni; Jennifer Wiggins; Rachel Robinson; Ruth Charlton; Michael Sandberg; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Psychological Determinants of Men's Adherence to Cascade Screening for BRCA1/2.

Authors:  Giulia Ongaro; Serena Petrocchi; Mariarosaria Calvello; Bernardo Bonanni; Irene Feroce; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.109

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.