Literature DB >> 19968405

Behavioral filter vent blocking on the first cigarette of the day predicts which smokers of light cigarettes will increase smoke exposure from blocked vents.

Andrew A Strasser1, Kathy Z Tang, Paul M Sanborn, Jon Y Zhou, Lynn T Kozlowski.   

Abstract

Filter vent blocking on best-selling light cigarettes increases smoke yield during standard machine testing but not in clinical investigations of smokers. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of (a) manipulating cigarette filter vent blocking and (b) blocking status of first cigarette of the day on carbon monoxide (CO) boost. Participants (n = 25; Marlboro Lights nonmenthol cigarette smokers, age range 21-60 years, minimum 15 daily cigarettes, and daily smoking for a minimum 5 years) completed the laboratory-based, within-subject, double-blind, cross-over design of 2 smoking sessions, one utilizing a smoking topography device, one without. Each session consisted of smoking 4 cigarettes; 2 with filter vents blocked and 2 with filter vents unblocked. Spent first daily cigarette filters collected between sessions were scored for evidence of filter vent blocking. Smoking cigarettes with blocked filter vents significantly increased CO boost in both laboratory sessions (p < .001). Those who blocked their first cigarette of the day (n = 10) had significantly greater CO boost when smoking a blocked cigarette, in relation to smoking an unblocked cigarette and in comparison with nonblockers (p = .04). Total puff volume was a significant predictor of CO boost when smoking unblocked and blocked cigarettes (ps < .04). Blocking filter vents significantly increased smoke exposure in relation to when filter vents are not blocked, particularly for those who block filter vents on their first cigarette of the day. Total puff volume predicted CO boost, and results suggest that smokers adjust their smoking behavior by cigarette blocking status. Those smokers who block filter vents may be increasing their exposure by 30%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19968405      PMCID: PMC4047634          DOI: 10.1037/a0017649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  25 in total

Review 1.  Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Smokers are unaware of the filter vents now on most cigarettes: results of a national survey.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; M E Goldberg; B A Yost; F M Ahern; K R Aronson; C T Sweeney
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Reduced tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide exposure while smoking ultralow- but not low-yield cigarettes.

Authors:  N L Benowitz; P Jacob; L Yu; R Talcott; S Hall; R T Jones
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Misuse of "light" cigarettes by means of vent blocking.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; J L Pillitteri; C T Sweeney
Journal:  J Subst Abuse       Date:  1994

5.  A comparison of the yields of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide of 36 brands of Canadian cigarettes tested under three conditions.

Authors:  W S Rickert; J C Robinson; J C Young; N E Collishaw; D F Bray
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  The misuse of 'less-hazardous' cigarettes and its detection: hole-blocking of ventilated filters.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R C Frecker; V Khouw; M A Pope
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Self-selected blocking of vents on low-yield cigarettes.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; T F Heatherton; R C Frecker; H E Nolte
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire.

Authors:  T F Heatherton; L T Kozlowski; R C Frecker; K O Fagerström
Journal:  Br J Addict       Date:  1991-09

9.  Smoking topography: reliability and validity in dependent smokers.

Authors:  Eun M Lee; Jennifer L Malson; Andrew J Waters; Eric T Moolchan; Wallace B Pickworth
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.244

10.  Cigarette filter vent blocking: effects on smoking topography and carbon monoxide exposure.

Authors:  J P Zacny; M L Stitzer; J E Yingling
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.533

View more
  16 in total

1.  Reduced nicotine content cigarette advertising: How false beliefs and subjective ratings affect smoking behavior.

Authors:  Melissa Mercincavage; Megan L Saddleson; Emily Gup; Angela Halstead; Darren Mays; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Smoking Behavior and Smoke Constituents from Cigarillos and Little Cigars.

Authors:  Bartosz Koszowski; Zachary R Rosenberry; Daniel Yi; Sean Stewart; Wallace B Pickworth
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2017-04

3.  Effects of Pictorial Warning Labels for Cigarettes and Quit-Efficacy on Emotional Responses, Smoking Satisfaction, and Cigarette Consumption.

Authors:  Daniel Romer; Stuart G Ferguson; Andrew A Strasser; Abigail T Evans; Mary Kate Tompkins; Joseph Macisco; Michael Fardal; Martin Tusler; Peters Ellen
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-05

4.  Attrition during a randomized controlled trial of reduced nicotine content cigarettes as a proxy for understanding acceptability of nicotine product standards.

Authors:  Melissa Mercincavage; E Paul Wileyto; Megan L Saddleson; Kirsten Lochbuehler; Eric C Donny; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  Nicotine metabolite ratio predicts smoking topography and carcinogen biomarker level.

Authors:  Andrew A Strasser; Neal L Benowitz; Angela G Pinto; Kathy Z Tang; Stephen S Hecht; Steve G Carmella; Rachel F Tyndale; Caryn E Lerman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Reduced Nicotine Content Expectancies Affect Initial Responses to Smoking.

Authors:  Melissa Mercincavage; Joshua M Smyth; Andrew A Strasser; Steven A Branstetter
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-10-01

7.  Effects of 21 days of varenicline versus placebo on smoking behaviors and urges among non-treatment seeking smokers.

Authors:  Rebecca L Ashare; Kathy Z Tang; A Clementina Mesaros; Ian A Blair; Frank Leone; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.153

8.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Progressively Reduced Nicotine Content Cigarettes on Smoking Behaviors, Biomarkers of Exposure, and Subjective Ratings.

Authors:  Melissa Mercincavage; Valentina Souprountchouk; Kathy Z Tang; Rachel L Dumont; E Paul Wileyto; Steven G Carmella; Stephen S Hecht; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Nicotine Replacement, Topography, and Smoking Phenotypes of E-cigarettes.

Authors:  Andrew A Strasser; Valentina Souprountchouk; Amanda Kaufmann; Sonja Blazekovic; Frank Leone; Neal L Benowitz; Robert A Schnoll
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-10

10.  The effect of menthol on cigarette smoking behaviors, biomarkers and subjective responses.

Authors:  Andrew A Strasser; Rebecca L Ashare; Madeline Kaufman; Kathy Z Tang; A Clementina Mesaros; Ian A Blair
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.