Literature DB >> 3723711

Reduced tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide exposure while smoking ultralow- but not low-yield cigarettes.

N L Benowitz, P Jacob, L Yu, R Talcott, S Hall, R T Jones.   

Abstract

An unresolved public health issue is whether some modern cigarettes are less hazardous than others and whether patients who cannot stop smoking should be advised to switch to lower-yield cigarettes. We studied "tar" (estimated by urine mutagenicity), nicotine, and carbon monoxide exposure in habitual smokers switched from their usual brand to high- (15 mg of tar), low- (5 mg of tar), or ultralow-yield (1 mg of tar) cigarettes. There were no differences in exposure comparing high- or low-yield cigarettes, but tar and nicotine exposures were reduced by 49% and 56%, respectively, and carbon monoxide exposure by 36% while smoking ultralow-yield cigarettes. Similarly, in 248 subjects smoking their self-selected brand, nicotine intake, estimated by blood concentrations of its metabolite cotinine, was 40% lower in those who smoked ultralow but no different in those smoking higher yields of cigarettes. Our data indicate that ultralow-yield cigarettes do deliver substantial doses of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide, but that exposures are considerably less than for other cigarettes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3723711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  28 in total

1.  Combating the 'safe' cigarette: ethical, public health issues and regulatory proposals.

Authors:  T J Cutler; D A Nye
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1999

2.  Cigarette nicotine yields and nicotine intake among Japanese male workers.

Authors:  K Ueda; I Kawachi; M Nakamura; H Nogami; N Shirokawa; S Masui; A Okayama; A Oshima
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. III. A reanalysis of the nicotine regulation hypothesis.

Authors:  R J DeGrandpre; W K Bickel; J R Hughes; S T Higgins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Brand switching or reduced consumption? A study of how cigarette taxes affect tobacco consumption.

Authors:  Chiang-Ming Chen; Kuo-Liang Chang; Lin Lin; Jwo-Leun Lee
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-12-12

5.  Examining the relation between usual-brand nicotine yield, blood cotinine concentration and the nicotine- "compensation" hypothesis.

Authors:  W S Pritchard; J H Robinson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Determinants of plasma concentrations of nicotine and cotinine during cigarette smoking and transdermal nicotine treatment.

Authors:  S G Gourlay; N L Benowitz; A Forbes; J J McNeil
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Reducing the addictiveness of cigarettes. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association.

Authors:  J E Henningfield; N L Benowitz; J Slade; T P Houston; R M Davis; S D Deitchman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Behavioral filter vent blocking on the first cigarette of the day predicts which smokers of light cigarettes will increase smoke exposure from blocked vents.

Authors:  Andrew A Strasser; Kathy Z Tang; Paul M Sanborn; Jon Y Zhou; Lynn T Kozlowski
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Spontaneous cigarette brand switching: consequences for nicotine and carbon monoxide exposure.

Authors:  C J Lynch; N L Benowitz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Comparison of measured and FTC-predicted nicotine uptake in smokers.

Authors:  G D Byrd; J H Robinson; W S Caldwell; J D deBethizy
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.