AIMS: To determine (1) if nicotine content affects study attrition-a potential behavioral measure of acceptability-in a trial that required compliance with three levels of reduced nicotine content (RNC) cigarettes, and (2) if attrition is associated with subjective and behavioral responses to RNC cigarettes. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a 35-day, parallel-design, open-label, randomized controlled trial. After a 5-day baseline period, participants were randomized to smoke for three 10-day periods: their preferred brand (control group) or RNC cigarettes with three nicotine levels in a within-subject stepdown (one group: high-moderate-low) or non-stepdown (five groups: high-low-moderate, low-moderate-high, low-high-moderate, moderate-low-high, moderate-high-low) fashion. SETTING: A single site in Philadelphia, PA, USA. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 246 non-treatment-seeking daily smokers [meanage = 39.52, cigarettes per day (CPD) = 20.95, 68.3% white] were recruited from October 2007 to June 2013. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was attrition. Key predictors were nicotine content transition and study period. Exploratory predictors were taste and strengthsubjective ratings, total puff volume and carbon monoxide (CO) boost. Covariates included: age, gender, race, education and nicotine dependence. FINDINGS:Overall attrition was 31.3% (n = 77): 24.1% of the control and 25.0% of the stepdown RNC cigarette groups dropped out versus 44.6% of non-stepdown groups (P = 0.006). Compared with controls, attrition odds were 4.5 and 4.7 times greater among smokers transitioning from preferred and the highest RNC cigarettes to the lowest RNC cigarettes, respectively (P = 0.001 and 0.003). Providing more favorable initial taste ratings of study cigarettes decreased attrition odds by 2% (P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of participants completed a 35-day trial of varying levels of reduced nicotine content cigarettes. Participant dropout was greater for cigarettes with lower nicotine content and less in smokers reporting more favorable subjective ratings of the cigarettes.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To determine (1) if nicotine content affects study attrition-a potential behavioral measure of acceptability-in a trial that required compliance with three levels of reduced nicotine content (RNC) cigarettes, and (2) if attrition is associated with subjective and behavioral responses to RNC cigarettes. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a 35-day, parallel-design, open-label, randomized controlled trial. After a 5-day baseline period, participants were randomized to smoke for three 10-day periods: their preferred brand (control group) or RNC cigarettes with three nicotine levels in a within-subject stepdown (one group: high-moderate-low) or non-stepdown (five groups: high-low-moderate, low-moderate-high, low-high-moderate, moderate-low-high, moderate-high-low) fashion. SETTING: A single site in Philadelphia, PA, USA. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 246 non-treatment-seeking daily smokers [mean age = 39.52, cigarettes per day (CPD) = 20.95, 68.3% white] were recruited from October 2007 to June 2013. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was attrition. Key predictors were nicotine content transition and study period. Exploratory predictors were taste and strength subjective ratings, total puff volume and carbon monoxide (CO) boost. Covariates included: age, gender, race, education and nicotine dependence. FINDINGS: Overall attrition was 31.3% (n = 77): 24.1% of the control and 25.0% of the stepdown RNC cigarette groups dropped out versus 44.6% of non-stepdown groups (P = 0.006). Compared with controls, attrition odds were 4.5 and 4.7 times greater among smokers transitioning from preferred and the highest RNC cigarettes to the lowest RNC cigarettes, respectively (P = 0.001 and 0.003). Providing more favorable initial taste ratings of study cigarettes decreased attrition odds by 2% (P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of participants completed a 35-day trial of varying levels of reduced nicotine content cigarettes. Participant dropout was greater for cigarettes with lower nicotine content and less in smokers reporting more favorable subjective ratings of the cigarettes.
Authors: David A Macqueen; Bryan W Heckman; Melissa D Blank; Kate Janse Van Rensburg; David E Evans; David J Drobes Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2012-03-20 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Dorothy K Hatsukami; Stephen J Heishman; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Rachel L Denlinger; Astia N Roper-Batker; Kristen M Mackowick; Joni Jensen; Sharon E Murphy; Brian F Thomas; Eric Donny Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Neal L Benowitz; Katherine M Dains; Sharon M Hall; Susan Stewart; Margaret Wilson; Delia Dempsey; Peyton Jacob Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Neal L Benowitz; Sharon M Hall; Susan Stewart; Margaret Wilson; Delia Dempsey; Peyton Jacob Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Dorothy K Hatsukami; Neal L Benowitz; Eric Donny; Jack Henningfield; Mitch Zeller Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Neal L Benowitz; Katherine M Dains; Delia Dempsey; Brenda Herrera; Lisa Yu; Peyton Jacob Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-06-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Andrea C Johnson; Melissa Mercincavage; Valentina Souprountchouk; Anupreet K Sidhu; Andrea C Villanti; Cristine D Delnevo; Andrew A Strasser Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 4.852
Authors: Tracy T Smith; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Neal L Benowitz; Suzanne M Colby; F Joseph McClernon; Andrew A Strasser; Jennifer W Tidey; Cassidy M White; Eric C Donny Journal: Prev Med Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Bryan W Heckman; K Michael Cummings; Alexander A Hirsch; Amanda J Quisenberry; Ron Borland; Richard J O'Connor; Geoffrey T Fong; Warren K Bickel Journal: Tob Regul Sci Date: 2017-07