Literature DB >> 6657634

A comparison of the yields of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide of 36 brands of Canadian cigarettes tested under three conditions.

W S Rickert, J C Robinson, J C Young, N E Collishaw, D F Bray.   

Abstract

A number of countries, including Canada, sponsor routine monitoring of cigarette tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide yields which are evaluated by cigarette-smoking machines according to a standard protocol. These standardized yields continue to decline as tobacco companies modify their brands to meet consumers' demand for "light" products. This trend toward cigarettes with low average deliveries of toxic substances may reduce health risks for some people. However, switching to low-yield cigarettes may not result in reduced risks for smokers who smoke these cigarettes intensively. Thirty-six brands of Canadian cigarettes, including 28 with ventilated filters, were tested under standard conditions and 2 others in order to determine how yields of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide change when cigarettes are manipulated by smokers in order to increase their smoke intake. While the rank order yields of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide was preserved, the average yields of all three substances more than doubled when cigarettes were intensively smoked in comparison with standard smoking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6657634     DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(83)90226-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; R J O'Connor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Cigarette nicotine yields and nicotine intake among Japanese male workers.

Authors:  K Ueda; I Kawachi; M Nakamura; H Nogami; N Shirokawa; S Masui; A Okayama; A Oshima
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Eclipse: does it live up to its health claims?

Authors:  J Slade; Gregory N Connolly; D Lymperis
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  Dependence of tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide yields on physical parameters: implications for exposure, emissions control and monitoring.

Authors:  W E Stephens
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Filter ventilation and nicotine content of tobacco in cigarettes from Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Authors:  L T Kozlowski; N Y Mehta; C T Sweeney; S S Schwartz; G P Vogler; M J Jarvis; R J West
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 6.  Revising the machine smoking regime for cigarette emissions: implications for tobacco control policy.

Authors:  David Hammond; Friedrich Wiebel; Lynn T Kozlowski; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Richard J O'Connor; Ann McNeill; Greg N Connolly; Deborah Arnott; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  The unbearable lightness of "light" cigarettes: a comparison of smoke yields in six varieties of Canadian "light" cigarettes.

Authors:  Paul L Gendreau; Frank Vitaro
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2005 May-Jun

8.  Behavioral filter vent blocking on the first cigarette of the day predicts which smokers of light cigarettes will increase smoke exposure from blocked vents.

Authors:  Andrew A Strasser; Kathy Z Tang; Paul M Sanborn; Jon Y Zhou; Lynn T Kozlowski
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.157

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.