Literature DB >> 8674026

Psychosocial aspects of participation in early anticancer drug trials. Report of a pilot study.

K Cox1, M Avis.   

Abstract

Despite improvements in the treatment of many cancers, the need for effective new therapies is as great as ever. However, evaluating new drug treatments for cancer in clinical practice raises complex problems. Early trials of new drugs offer little in the way of therapeutic benefit, since their main aim is to identify toxic effects of the drug and subsequent doses for testing. The ethical and practical problems that these trials raise have received some attention in the literature. The main focus of previous studies has been the process of informed consent for trial participation, which has tended to reflect the perspective of the clinicians involved. Little attention has been given to patients' views in this context, and still less work has explored the total experience of clinical trial participation. In order to address these gaps in the literature, a research study was developed to explore the psychosocial aspects of participation in early anticancer drug trials from the perspective of the patient. This article reports the findings of a pilot study. The pilot study obtained the views of seven patients as they progressed through an anticancer drug trial. The informed consent process, the reasons behind decision-making concerning trial participation, and the impact of participation on the lives of the patients were explored, along with changing needs for information, care, and support as the trial progressed. Findings identify psychosocial aspects of clinical trial participation related to information, decision-making, and support from the perspective of those actually taking part.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8674026     DOI: 10.1097/00002820-199606000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Nurs        ISSN: 0162-220X            Impact factor:   2.592


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cancer patient decision making related to clinical trial participation: an integrative review with implications for patients' relational autonomy.

Authors:  Jennifer A H Bell; Lynda G Balneaves
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Contributing to research via biobanks: what it means to cancer patients.

Authors:  Isabelle Pellegrini; Christian Chabannon; Julien Mancini; Frederic Viret; Norbert Vey; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: feasibility, approach, and results.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Holly A Taylor; Joseph Ali; Kristina Hallez; Lelia Chaisson
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  A qualitative assessment of the experience of participating in a cancer-related clinical trial.

Authors:  Addie C Wootten; Jo M Abbott; Heather M Siddons; Mark A Rosenthal; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Managing clinical research permissions electronically: A novel approach to enhancing recruitment and managing consents.

Authors:  Iain C Sanderson; Jihad S Obeid; Kapil Chalil Madathil; Katherine Gerken; Katrina Fryar; Daniel Rugg; Colin E Alstad; Randall Alexander; Kathleen T Brady; Anand K Gramopadhye; Jay Moskowitz
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Motivations and barriers for healthy participants to participate in herbal remedy clinical trial in Tanzania: A qualitative study based on the theory of planned behaviour.

Authors:  Kamaka R Kassimu; Florence A Milando; Justin J Omolo; Gloria Nyaulingo; Hussein Mbarak; Latipha Mohamed; Ramla Rashid; Saumu Ahmed; Mohammed Rashid; Gumi Abdallah; Thabit Mbaga; Fatuma Issa; Omar Lweno; Neema Balige; Bakari Mwalimu; Ali Hamad; Ally Olotu; Said Jongo; Billy Ngasala; Salim Abdulla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Can patient decision aids help people make good decisions about participating in clinical trials? A study protocol.

Authors:  Jamie C Brehaut; Alison Lott; Dean A Fergusson; Kaveh G Shojania; Jonathan Kimmelman; Raphael Saginur
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Factors affecting recruitment to an observational multicentre palliative care study.

Authors:  Patrick C Stone; Bridget Gwilliam; Vaughan Keeley; Chris Todd; Laura C Kelly; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.568

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.