Literature DB >> 14961773

A survey of breast cancer patients' views on entry into several clinical studies.

K Burnet1, J Benson, H Earl, H Thornton, K Cox, A D Purushotham.   

Abstract

During the course of their treatment and follow-up, women with breast cancer are likely to be asked to join a number of different clinical studies. Some local research ethics committees have expressed concerns about entry of individual patients into multiple research studies. A survey was undertaken to improve understanding of patients' own perceptions of participation in several clinical studies. A total of 96 patients who had previously undergone surgery for breast cancer from January to June 2000 were sent a questionnaire 6-12 months after completion of primary treatment. Eighty four per cent of questionnaires were returned of which 62% were from patients who had been approached to enter at least one clinical study. Sixty-four per cent of patients believed that there should not be a limit on the number of clinical studies offered to patients. Furthermore, three quarters of all patients would have considered entering more than one study if adequate explanation and written information were provided. Most patients felt that their participation in a clinical study was worthwhile and no patients surveyed regretted their decision to take part in a study. Almost two-thirds of patients who returned questionnaires believed there should not be a maximum number of studies offered to them. This survey suggests that the majority of patients are prepared to participate in more than one clinical study when adequate information and explanation are provided.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14961773     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2003.00439.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  7 in total

Review 1.  Recommendations for enhancing clinical trials education: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Karen A Stepan; Amy P Gonzalez; Vivian S Dorsey; Debra K Frye; Nita D Pyle; Regina F Smith; Terry A Throckmorton; Louise A Villejo; Scott B Cantor
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  For the Benefit of Others: Reasons Why Women with Breast Cancer Participate in RCTs.

Authors:  Valerie A Jenkins; Lesley J Fallowfield
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  A qualitative assessment of the experience of participating in a cancer-related clinical trial.

Authors:  Addie C Wootten; Jo M Abbott; Heather M Siddons; Mark A Rosenthal; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Making co-enrolment feasible for randomised controlled trials in paediatric intensive care.

Authors:  Katie Harron; Twin Lee; Tracy Ball; Quen Mok; Carrol Gamble; Duncan Macrae; Ruth Gilbert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The attitudes of 1066 patients with cancer towards participation in randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  V Jenkins; D Farewell; L Batt; T Maughan; L Branston; C Langridge; L Parlour; V Farewell; L Fallowfield
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Decisions and the involvement of cancer patient survivors: a moral imperative.

Authors:  Gabriella Pravettoni; Ilaria Cutica; Simona Righetti; Ketti Mazzocco
Journal:  J Healthc Leadersh       Date:  2016-12-07

Review 7.  Co-enrolment of Participants into Multiple Cancer Trials: Benefits and Challenges.

Authors:  F H Cafferty; C Coyle; S Rowley; L Berkman; M MacKensie; R E Langley
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.126

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.