Literature DB >> 20563877

Cancer-related psychosocial research: what are the perspectives of cancer care centre users on participation?

Julie Hepworth1, Ann R R Robertson, Anita Jhunjhunwala, Glyn C Jarvis, Chris McVittie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the perspectives of cancer care centre users on participation in psychosocial research to inform research design and ethics.
METHODS: The study is based on a qualitative research design. Fourteen semistructured interviews were carried in people diagnosed with cancer and carers. The interview included four main questions about practical barriers to participation, types of research design, motivating factors and the conduct of research in a cancer care support setting. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.
RESULTS: Interviewees demonstrated a willingness to participate in psychosocial research within certain circumstances. There were no practical barriers identified, although they considered payment for research-related travel important. The most acceptable research design was the face-to-face interview and the least preferred was the randomised control trial. The factors that motivated participation were altruism, valuing research, and making a contribution to the centre. Interviewees supported the conduct of research in cancer care support centres conditional upon delaying recruitment during the initial months of users' visits and its need to be discreet to avoid deterring visitors from accessing the centre.
CONCLUSIONS: The study concludes that the personal interaction between participants and researchers is the most important feature of decision-making by patients/carers to join studies. Taking into account the perspectives of people affected by cancer during the early stages of research design may enhance recruitment and retention and can contribute to the development of research protocols and ethics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20563877     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-010-0931-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  19 in total

1.  Problems recruiting cancer patients to a comparative clinical trial of drug treatments for neuropathic pain in palliative care.

Authors:  Claire Sinnott
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  User and carer participation in research in palliative care.

Authors:  Jane Bradburn; Jane Maher
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.762

3.  Capturing users' experiences of participating in cancer trials.

Authors:  J L Donovan; L Brindle; N Mills
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.520

Review 4.  Identifying, recruiting, and retaining seriously-ill patients and their caregivers in longitudinal research.

Authors:  Karen E Steinhauser; Elizabeth C Clipp; Judith C Hays; Maren Olsen; Robert Arnold; Nicholas A Christakis; Jennifer Hoff Lindquist; James A Tulsky
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.762

5.  Who enrolls in observational end of life research? Report from the cultural variations in approaches to end of life study.

Authors:  Etienne Phipps; Diana Harris; Leonard E Braitman; William Tester; Nora Madison-Thompson; Gala True
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Factors that influence Spanish- and English-speaking participants' decision to enroll in cancer randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Lee Ellington; Stephanie Wahab; Shadi Sahami Martin; Rosemary Field; Kathleen H Mooney
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  'Someone who cares:' a qualitative investigation of cancer patients' experiences of psychotherapy.

Authors:  T MacCormack; J Simonian; J Lim; L Remond; D Roets; S Dunn; P Butow
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Enhancing cancer clinical trial management: recommendations from a qualitative study of trial participants' experiences.

Authors:  K Cox
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  A qualitative assessment of the experience of participating in a cancer-related clinical trial.

Authors:  Addie C Wootten; Jo M Abbott; Heather M Siddons; Mark A Rosenthal; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Understanding why older people participate in clinical trials: the experience of the Scottish PROSPER participants.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Tolmie; Moira M B Mungall; Greig Louden; Grace M Lindsay; Allan Gaw
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 10.668

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cancer patients' and clinicians' opinions on the best time in secondary care to approach patients for recruitment to longitudinal questionnaire-based research.

Authors:  Laura Ashley; Helen Jones; Galina Velikova; Penny Wright
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Procedure versus process: ethical paradigms and the conduct of qualitative research.

Authors:  Kristian Pollock
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Consumer participation in quality improvements for chronic disease care: development and evaluation of an interactive patient-centered survey to identify preferred service initiatives.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Fradgley; Christine L Paul; Jamie Bryant; Ian A Roos; Frans A Henskens; David J Paul
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Cancer Data and Aboriginal Disparities (CanDAD)-developing an Advanced Cancer Data System for Aboriginal people in South Australia: a mixed methods research protocol.

Authors:  Paul Henry Yerrell; David Roder; Margaret Cargo; Rachel Reilly; David Banham; Jasmine May Micklem; Kim Morey; Harold Bundamurra Stewart; Janet Stajic; Michael Norris; Alex Brown
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Navigating choice in the face of uncertainty: using a theory informed qualitative approach to identifying potential patient barriers and enablers to participating in an early phase chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy trial.

Authors:  Gisell Castillo; Manoj M Lalu; Sarah Asad; Madison Foster; Natasha Kekre; Dean A Fergusson; Terry Hawrysh; Harold Atkins; Kednapa Thavorn; Joshua Montroy; Stuart Schwartz; Robert A Holt; Raewyn Broady; Justin Presseau
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  A feasibility study exploring the role of pre-operative assessment when examining the mechanism of 'chemo-brain' in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Valerie Jenkins; Ryan Thwaites; Mara Cercignani; Sandra Sacre; Neil Harrison; Hefina Whiteley-Jones; Lisa Mullen; Giselle Chamberlain; Kevin Davies; Charles Zammit; Lucy Matthews; Helena Harder
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-03-31

7.  Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kathrine Hoffmann Pii; Lone Helle Schou; Karin Piil; Mary Jarden
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.377

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.