Literature DB >> 18287554

Frequency modulation during song in a suboscine does not require vocal muscles.

Ana Amador1, Franz Goller, Gabriel B Mindlin.   

Abstract

The physiology of sound production in suboscines is poorly investigated. Suboscines are thought to develop song innately unlike the closely related oscines. Comparing phonatory mechanisms might therefore provide interesting insight into the evolution of vocal learning. Here we investigate sound production and control of sound frequency in the Great Kiskadee (Pitangus sulfuratus) by recording air sac pressure and vocalizations during spontaneously generated song. In all the songs and calls recorded, the modulations of the fundamental frequency are highly correlated to air sac pressure. To test whether this relationship reflects frequency control by changing respiratory activity or indicates synchronized vocal control, we denervated the syringeal muscles by bilateral resection of the tracheosyringeal nerve. After denervation, the strong correlation between fundamental frequency and air sac pressure patterns remained unchanged. A single linear regression relates sound frequency to air sac pressure in the intact and denervated birds. This surprising lack of control by syringeal muscles of frequency in Kiskadees, in strong contrast to songbirds, poses the question of how air sac pressure regulates sound frequency. To explore this question theoretically, we assume a nonlinear restitution force for the oscillating membrane folds in a two mass model of sound production. This nonlinear restitution force is essential to reproduce the frequency modulations of the observed vocalizations.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18287554     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01002.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  24 in total

1.  A mechanism for frequency modulation in songbirds shared with humans.

Authors:  Ana Amador; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  New perspectives on the physics of birdsong.

Authors:  M A Trevisan; G B Mindlin
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Breathtaking Songs: Coordinating the Neural Circuits for Breathing and Singing.

Authors:  Marc F Schmidt; Franz Goller
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-11-01

4.  Controllable biomimetic birdsong.

Authors:  Aryesh Mukherjee; Shreyas Mandre; L Mahadevan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Evolution of Vocal Diversity through Morphological Adaptation without Vocal Learning or Complex Neural Control.

Authors:  Sarah M Garcia; Cecilia Kopuchian; Gabriel B Mindlin; Matthew J Fuxjager; Pablo L Tubaro; Franz Goller
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Functional morphology of the sound-generating labia in the syrinx of two songbird species.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Franz Goller
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  On the relation between loudness and the increased song frequency of urban birds.

Authors:  Gonçalo C Cardoso; Jonathan W Atwell
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  On amplitude and frequency in birdsong: a reply to Zollinger et al.

Authors:  Gonçalo C Cardoso; Jonathan W Atwell
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Sexual dimorphism of the zebra finch syrinx indicates adaptation for high fundamental frequencies in males.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; John H Fisher; Franz Goller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  High-pitched notes during vocal contests signal genetic diversity in ocellated antbirds.

Authors:  Yi-Men Araya-Ajoy; Johel Chaves-Campos; Elisabeth K V Kalko; J Andrew Dewoody
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.