Literature DB >> 19956383

Applications of the repeatability of quantitative imaging biomarkers: a review of statistical analysis of repeat data sets.

Huiman X Barnhart1, Daniel P Barboriak.   

Abstract

Repeat imaging data sets performed on patients with cancer are becoming publicly available. The potential utility of these data sets for addressing important questions in imaging biomarker development is vast. In particular, these data sets may be useful to help characterize the variability of quantitative parameters derived from imaging. This article reviews statistical analysis that may be performed to use results of repeat imaging to 1) calculate the level of change in parameter value that may be seen in individual patients to confidently characterize that patient as showing true parameter change, 2) calculate the level of change in parameters value that may be seen in individual patients to confidently categorize that patient as showing true lack of parameter change, 3) determine if different imaging devices are interchangeable from the standpoint of repeatability, and 4) estimate the numbers of patients needed to precisely calculate repeatability. In addition, we recommend a set of statistical parameters that should be reported when the repeatability of continuous parameters is studied.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19956383      PMCID: PMC2781067          DOI: 10.1593/tlo.09268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1936-5233            Impact factor:   4.243


  17 in total

1.  Reproducibility, repeatability, correlation and measurement error.

Authors:  S Halligan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  An overview on assessing agreement with continuous measurements.

Authors:  Huiman X Barnhart; Michael J Haber; Lawrence I Lin
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 3.  The opportunities and challenges of developing imaging biomarkers to study lung function and disease.

Authors:  Daniel P Schuster
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 4.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems.

Authors:  Charles E Metz
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 5.  The role of clinical imaging in oncological drug development.

Authors:  P S Murphy; T J McCarthy; A S K Dzik-Jurasz
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Imaging as a biomarker for therapy response: cancer as a prototype for the creation of research resources.

Authors:  G McLennan; L Clarke; R J Hohl
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 7.  Molecular imaging in drug development.

Authors:  Jürgen K Willmann; Nicholas van Bruggen; Ludger M Dinkelborg; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  Quantitative tumor perfusion assessment with multidetector CT: are measurements from two commercial software packages interchangeable?

Authors:  Vicky Goh; Steve Halligan; Clive I Bartram
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Tumor blood flow measured by perfusion computed tomography and 15O-labeled water positron emission tomography: a comparison study.

Authors:  Chaan S Ng; Yoshihisa Kodama; Nizar A Mullani; Bruce J Barron; Wei Wei; Roy S Herbst; James L Abbruzzese; Chusilp Charnsangavej
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 10.  Quantitative techniques in 18FDG PET scanning in oncology.

Authors:  F Castell; G J R Cook
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  65 in total

1.  Lateralization of temporal lobe epilepsy using a novel uncertainty analysis of MR diffusion in hippocampus, cingulum, and fornix, and hippocampal volume and FLAIR intensity.

Authors:  Mohammad-Reza Nazem-Zadeh; Jason M Schwalb; Kost V Elisevich; Hassan Bagher-Ebadian; Hajar Hamidian; Ali-Reza Akhondi-Asl; Kourosh Jafari-Khouzani; Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.181

2.  Impact of uncertainty in longitudinal T1 measurements on quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Madhava P Aryal; Thomas L Chenevert; Yue Cao
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Quantitative imaging for evaluation of response to cancer therapy.

Authors:  Laurence P Clarke; Barbara S Croft; Robert Nordstrom; Huiming Zhang; Gary Kelloff; J Tatum
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 4.  The promise of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Yue Cao
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.934

5.  Repeatability of dynamic contrast enhanced vp parameter in healthy subjects and patients with brain tumors.

Authors:  Moran Artzi; Gilad Liberman; Deborah T Blumenthal; Felix Bokstein; Orna Aizenstein; Dafna Ben Bashat
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Radiation therapy effects on white matter fiber tracts of the limbic circuit.

Authors:  Mohammad-Reza Nazem-Zadeh; Christopher H Chapman; Theodore L Lawrence; Christina I Tsien; Yue Cao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  [11 C]arachidonic acid incorporation measurement in human brain: Optimization for clinical use.

Authors:  Francesca Zanderigo; Yeona Kang; Dileep Kumar; Anastasia Nikolopoulou; P David Mozley; Paresh J Kothari; Bin He; David Schlyer; Stanley I Rapoport; Maria A Oquendo; Shankar Vallabhajosula; J John Mann; M Elizabeth Sublette
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.562

8.  ADC measurements on the Unity MR-linac - A recommendation on behalf of the Elekta Unity MR-linac consortium.

Authors:  Ernst S Kooreman; Petra J van Houdt; Rick Keesman; Floris J Pos; Vivian W J van Pelt; Marlies E Nowee; Andreas Wetscherek; Rob H N Tijssen; Marielle E P Philippens; Daniela Thorwarth; Jihong Wang; Amita Shukla-Dave; William A Hall; Eric S Paulson; Uulke A van der Heide
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Test-retest repeatability and reproducibility of ADC measures by breast DWI: Results from the ACRIN 6698 trial.

Authors:  David C Newitt; Zheng Zhang; Jessica E Gibbs; Savannah C Partridge; Thomas L Chenevert; Mark A Rosen; Patrick J Bolan; Helga S Marques; Sheye Aliu; Wen Li; Lisa Cimino; Bonnie N Joe; Heidi Umphrey; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Basak Dogan; Karen Oh; Hiroyuki Abe; Jennifer Drukteinis; Laura J Esserman; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Exploring intra- and inter-reader variability in uni-dimensional, bi-dimensional, and volumetric measurements of solid tumors on CT scans reconstructed at different slice intervals.

Authors:  Binsheng Zhao; Yongqiang Tan; Daniel J Bell; Sarah E Marley; Pingzhen Guo; Helen Mann; Marietta L J Scott; Lawrence H Schwartz; Dana C Ghiorghiu
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.