Literature DB >> 27358934

Impact of uncertainty in longitudinal T1 measurements on quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Madhava P Aryal, Thomas L Chenevert, Yue Cao.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the uncertainty in T1 measurement, by estimating the repeatability coefficient (RC) from two repeated scans, in normal appearing brain tissues employing two different T1 mapping methods. All brain MRI scans were performed on a 3 T MR scanner in 10 patients who had low grade/benign tumors and partial brain radiation therapy (RT) without chemotherapy, at pre-RT, 3 weeks into RT, end RT (6 weeks) and 11, 33, and 85 weeks after RT. T1-weighted images were acquired using (1) a spoiled gradient echo sequence with two flip angles (2FA: 5° and 15°) and (2) a progressive saturation recovery sequence (pSR) with five different TR values (100-2000 ms). Manually drawn volumes of interest (VOIs) included left and right normal putamen and thalamus in gray matter, and frontal and parietal white matter, which were distant from tumors and received a total of accumulated radiation doses less than 5 Gy at 3 weeks. No significant changes or even trends in mean T1 from pre-RT to 3 weeks into RT in these VOIs (p ≥ 0.11, Wilcoxon sign test) allowed us to calculate the repeatability statistics of between-subject means of squares, within-subject means of squares, F-score, and RC. The 2FA method produced RCs in the range of (9.7-11.7)% in gray matter and (12.2-14.5)% in white matter; while the pSR method led to RCs ranging from 10.9 to 17.9% in gray matter and 7.5 to 10.3% in white matter. The overall mean (±SD) RCs produced by the two methods, 12.0 (±1.6)% for 2FA and 12.0 (±3.8)% for pSR, were not significantly different (p = 0.97). A similar repeatability in T1 measurement produced by the time efficient 2FA method compared with the time consuming pSR method demonstrates that the 2FA method is desirable to integrate into dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for rapid acquisition.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27358934      PMCID: PMC4929815          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  23 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical trials of antivascular therapies.

Authors:  James P B O'Connor; Alan Jackson; Geoff J M Parker; Caleb Roberts; Gordon C Jayson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  T1 in high-grade glioma and the influence of different measurement strategies on parameter estimations in DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Christopher Larsson; Magne Kleppestø; Inge Grothe; Jonas Vardal; Atle Bjørnerud
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Practical medical applications of quantitative MR relaxometry.

Authors:  Hai-Ling Margaret Cheng; Nikola Stikov; Nilesh R Ghugre; Graham A Wright
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Repeatability of T1-quantification in dGEMRIC for three different acquisition techniques: two-dimensional inversion recovery, three-dimensional look locker, and three-dimensional variable flip angle.

Authors:  Carl Siversson; Carl-Johan Tiderius; Paul Neuman; Leif Dahlberg; Jonas Svensson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  T₁ mapping using variable flip angle SPGR data with flip angle correction.

Authors:  Gilad Liberman; Yoram Louzoun; Dafna Ben Bashat
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Errors in Quantitative Image Analysis due to Platform-Dependent Image Scaling.

Authors:  Thomas L Chenevert; Dariya I Malyarenko; David Newitt; Xin Li; Mohan Jayatilake; Alina Tudorica; Andriy Fedorov; Ron Kikinis; Tiffany Ting Liu; Mark Muzi; Matthew J Oborski; Charles M Laymon; Xia Li; Yankeelov Thomas; Kalpathy-Cramer Jayashree; James M Mountz; Paul E Kinahan; Daniel L Rubin; Fiona Fennessy; Wei Huang; Nola Hylton; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 7.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging biomarker.

Authors:  Nola Hylton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Effect of therapeutic ionizing radiation on the human brain.

Authors:  R G Steen; D Spence; S Wu; X Xiong; L E Kun; T E Merchant
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Applications of the repeatability of quantitative imaging biomarkers: a review of statistical analysis of repeat data sets.

Authors:  Huiman X Barnhart; Daniel P Barboriak
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a biomarker for prediction of radiation-induced neurocognitive dysfunction.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Christina I Tsien; Pia C Sundgren; Vijaya Nagesh; Daniel Normolle; Henry Buchtel; Larry Junck; Theodore S Lawrence
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  1 in total

1.  Accuracy, repeatability, and interplatform reproducibility of T1 quantification methods used for DCE-MRI: Results from a multicenter phantom study.

Authors:  Octavia Bane; Stefanie J Hectors; Mathilde Wagner; Lori L Arlinghaus; Madhava P Aryal; Yue Cao; Thomas L Chenevert; Fiona Fennessy; Wei Huang; Nola M Hylton; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Kathryn E Keenan; Dariya I Malyarenko; Robert V Mulkern; David C Newitt; Stephen E Russek; Karl F Stupic; Alina Tudorica; Lisa J Wilmes; Thomas E Yankeelov; Yi-Fei Yen; Michael A Boss; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.668

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.