PURPOSE: To segment fiber tracts in the limbic circuit and to assess their sensitivity to radiation therapy (RT). METHODS: Twelve patients with brain metastases who had received fractionated whole brain radiation therapy to 30 Gy or 37.5 Gy were included in the study. Diffusion weighted images were acquired pre-RT, at the end of RT, and 1-month post-RT. The fornix, corpus callosum, and cingulum were extracted from diffusion weighted images by combining fiber tracking and segmentation methods based upon characteristics of the fiber bundles. Cingulum was segmented by a seed-based tractography, fornix by a region of interests (ROI)-based tractography, and corpus callosum by a level-set segmentation algorithm. The radiation-induced longitudinal changes of diffusion indices of the structures were evaluated. RESULTS: Significant decreases were observed in the fractional anisotropy of the posterior part of the cingulum, fornix, and corpus callosum from pre-RT to end of RT by -14.0%, -12.5%, and -5.2%, respectively (p < 0.001), and from pre-RT to 1-month post-RT by -11.9%, -12.8%, and -6.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). Moreover, significant increases were observed in the mean diffusivity of the corpus callosum and the posterior part of the cingulum from pre-RT to end of RT by 6.8% and 6.5%, respectively, and from pre-RT to 1-month post-RT by 8.5% and 6.3%, respectively. The increase in the radial diffusivity primarily contributed to the significant decrease in the fractional anisotropy, indicating that demyelination is the predominant radiation effect on the white matter structures. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the fornix and the posterior part of the cingulum are significantly susceptible to radiation damage. We have developed robust computer-aided semiautomatic segmentation and fiber tracking tools to facilitate the ROI delineation of critical structures, which is important for assessment of radiation damage in a longitudinal fashion.
PURPOSE: To segment fiber tracts in the limbic circuit and to assess their sensitivity to radiation therapy (RT). METHODS: Twelve patients with brain metastases who had received fractionated whole brain radiation therapy to 30 Gy or 37.5 Gy were included in the study. Diffusion weighted images were acquired pre-RT, at the end of RT, and 1-month post-RT. The fornix, corpus callosum, and cingulum were extracted from diffusion weighted images by combining fiber tracking and segmentation methods based upon characteristics of the fiber bundles. Cingulum was segmented by a seed-based tractography, fornix by a region of interests (ROI)-based tractography, and corpus callosum by a level-set segmentation algorithm. The radiation-induced longitudinal changes of diffusion indices of the structures were evaluated. RESULTS: Significant decreases were observed in the fractional anisotropy of the posterior part of the cingulum, fornix, and corpus callosum from pre-RT to end of RT by -14.0%, -12.5%, and -5.2%, respectively (p < 0.001), and from pre-RT to 1-month post-RT by -11.9%, -12.8%, and -6.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). Moreover, significant increases were observed in the mean diffusivity of the corpus callosum and the posterior part of the cingulum from pre-RT to end of RT by 6.8% and 6.5%, respectively, and from pre-RT to 1-month post-RT by 8.5% and 6.3%, respectively. The increase in the radial diffusivity primarily contributed to the significant decrease in the fractional anisotropy, indicating that demyelination is the predominant radiation effect on the white matter structures. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the fornix and the posterior part of the cingulum are significantly susceptible to radiation damage. We have developed robust computer-aided semiautomatic segmentation and fiber tracking tools to facilitate the ROI delineation of critical structures, which is important for assessment of radiation damage in a longitudinal fashion.
Authors: Eric L Chang; Jeffrey S Wefel; Kenneth R Hess; Pamela K Allen; Frederick F Lang; David G Kornguth; Rebecca B Arbuckle; J Michael Swint; Almon S Shiu; Moshe H Maor; Christina A Meyers Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Jinsoo Uh; Thomas E Merchant; Yimei Li; Xingyu Li; Noah D Sabin; Daniel J Indelicato; Robert J Ogg; Frederick A Boop; John A Jane; Chiaho Hua Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-05-16 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Kathryn R Tringale; Tanya T Nguyen; Roshan Karunamuni; Tyler Seibert; Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le; Michael Connor; Vitali Moiseenko; Mary Kay Gorman; Anisa Marshall; Michelle Devereux Tibbs; Nikdokht Farid; Daniel Simpson; Parag Sanghvi; Carrie R McDonald; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2019-08-10 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Christopher H Chapman; Tong Zhu; Mohamad Nazem-Zadeh; Yebin Tao; Henry A Buchtel; Christina I Tsien; Theodore S Lawrence; Yue Cao Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Or Cohen-Inbar; Patrick Melmer; Cheng-chia Lee; Zhiyuan Xu; David Schlesinger; Jason P Sheehan Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Mohammad-Reza Nazem-Zadeh; Christopher H Chapman; Thomas Chenevert; Theodore S Lawrence; Randall K Ten Haken; Christina I Tsien; Yue Cao Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2014-04-28 Impact factor: 3.609