Literature DB >> 19946671

Early clinical outcomes of floating platform mobile-bearing TKA: longitudinal comparison with fixed-bearing TKA.

Tae Kyun Kim1, Chong Bum Chang, Yeon Gwi Kang, Byung June Chung, Hyung Joon Cho, Sang Cheol Seong.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to longitudinally compare a new floating platform mobile-bearing (MB) prosthesis with an established fixed-bearing (FB) system with respect to early clinical outcomes in patients with bilateral TKAs using the MB prosthesis in one knee and the FB prosthesis in the other. Clinical outcomes (ROM, AKS and WOMAC scores, and side preference), evaluated at 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively, were compared between knees fitted with the MB prosthesis (e.motion-FP) or the FB prosthesis (Genesis II) in 66 patients who underwent bilateral TKA. In addition, the same comparisons between the knees fitted with the MB prosthesis and the knees with the FB prosthesis were made separately in the subgroup of 33 patients implanted with a cruciate retaining FB (FB-CR) prosthesis and the other subgroup of 33 patients with a posteriorly stabilized FB (FB-PS) prosthesis in a knee. The floating platform MB prosthesis achieved comparable clinical outcomes to the FB prosthesis. No significant differences were found between the FB- and MB-implanted sides at any time with respect to the outcome scales, and temporal patterns were similar. However, comparisons of FB-CR and FB-PS patient groups revealed different temporal patterns. In the FB-CR group, most outcome scales were improved at 6 months, peaked at 12 months and then remained at this level at 24 months. In contrast, outcomes in the FB-PS group improved much faster to almost peak at 6 months, and then remained at this level. In the FB-CR group, more patients preferred the knee with fitted with a MB prosthesis at 6 months. In contrast, in the FB-PS group, no side preference for the MB prosthesis was observed, and more patients preferred knees implanted with the FB prosthesis at 12 and 24 months. This study demonstrates that this new mobile-bearing prosthesis, designed as a floating platform, provides satisfactory clinical performances that are comparable to those achieved using the established fixed-bearing prosthesis in terms of clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19946671     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0985-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  33 in total

1.  Low contact stress mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty: results at 5 to 13 years.

Authors:  J M Hartford; T Hunt; H Kaufer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Comparison between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knees in bilateral total knee replacements.

Authors:  T Watanabe; T Tomita; M Fujii; J Hashimoto; K Sugamoto; H Yoshikawa
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Mobile versus fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: mid-term comparative clinical results of 216 prostheses.

Authors:  D Biau; M M Mullins; T Judet; P Piriou
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The NexGen LPS-flex to the knee prosthesis at a minimum of three years.

Authors:  T-H Kim; D-H Lee; S-I Bin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-10

5.  Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Fionna Mowat; Kevin Ong; Nathan Chan; Edmund Lau; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Differences in patellar tracking and knee kinematics among three different total knee designs.

Authors:  J T Chew; N J Stewart; A D Hanssen; Z P Luo; J A Rand; K N An
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The long-term results of simultaneous fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements performed in the same patient.

Authors:  Y-H Kim; S-H Yoon; J-S Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-10

8.  Causes and predictors of patient's dissatisfaction after uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tae Kyun Kim; Chong Bum Chang; Yeon Gwi Kang; Sung Ju Kim; Sang Cheol Seong
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Characteristics of polyethylene wear particles isolated from synovial fluid after mobile-bearing and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Yukihide Minoda; Akio Kobayashi; Hiroyoshi Iwaki; Masatsugu Miyaguchi; Yoshinori Kadoya; Hirotsugu Ohashi; Kunio Takaoka
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 3.368

10.  Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised, clinical and radiological study with mid-term results at 7 years.

Authors:  A Lädermann; A Lübbeke; R Stern; N Riand; D Fritschy
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  6 in total

1.  No difference in ROM and knee function between mobile and floating platforms in TKA.

Authors:  Johannes Holinka; Navid Bahrami; Richard Lass; Sophie Frantal; Reinhard Windhager; Hugo Axel Wanivenhaus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Single-radius, multidirectional total knee replacement.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Rolf Miehlke; Dominique Saragaglia; Robert Geyer; Numa Mercier; Jean-Yves Schoenahl; Birger Thiel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  No differences between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B L Fransen; D C van Duijvenbode; M J M Hoozemans; B J Burger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Differences in anatomy and kinematics in Asian and Caucasian TKA patients: influence on implant positioning and subsequent loading conditions in mobile bearing knees.

Authors:  Allan Maas; Tae Kyun Kim; Rolf K Miehlke; Thomas Hagen; Thomas M Grupp
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  No difference between mobile and fixed bearing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Francesco Cuozzo; Marco Pilone; Karen Elsner; Jörg Eschweiler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.114

6.  Mid- term results of stryker® scorpio plus mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hideo Kobayashi; Naoto Mitsugi; Yuichi Mochida; Naoya Taki; Yasushi Akamatsu; Masato Aratake; Hirohiko Ota; Katsushi Ishii; Kengo Harigane; Taichi Ideno; Tomoyuki Saito
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2012-10-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.