Literature DB >> 15809873

Comparison between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knees in bilateral total knee replacements.

T Watanabe1, T Tomita, M Fujii, J Hashimoto, K Sugamoto, H Yoshikawa.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare mid-term results of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing in bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Twenty-two patients underwent bilateral TKA with a mobile-bearing prosthesis (Rotaglide, Corin, UK) on one side and a fixed-bearing prosthesis (NexGen-CR, Zimmer, USA) on the other. There were 21 female patients, and in 18 patients, the diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis. The average age was 59.6 (35-78) years. In all procedures, the posterior cruciate ligament was retained and patella re-surfaced. The average follow-up in the mobile-bearing group was 98 (79-107) months and 96 (79-107) months in the fixed-bearing group. At the final follow-up, the knee score was 91.8 points and 91.1 points, respectively, and the function score 65.5 points. The range of motion was similar in the two groups (1.1-106.9 degrees; 0.4-106.9 degrees). Five patients favoured the fixed-bearing prosthesis, but 16 found no difference. In patients with bilateral TKA, there was no difference in the short-term result between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15809873      PMCID: PMC3456881          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-005-0646-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  7 in total

1.  Bilateral total knee arthroplasty: One mobile-bearing and one fixed-bearing.

Authors:  K Y Chiu; T P Ng; W M Tang; P Lam
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.118

2.  The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system.

Authors:  F C Ewald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.

Authors:  J N Insall; L D Dorr; R D Scott; W N Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Y H Kim; H K Kook; J S Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis.

Authors:  H E Figgie; V M Goldberg; K G Heiple; H S Moller; N H Gordon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. A multicentre single-blind randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A J Price; J L Rees; D Beard; E Juszczak; S Carter; S White; R de Steiger; C A F Dodd; M Gibbons; P McLardy-Smith; J W Goodfellow; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-01

7.  Comparison of the PFC Sigma fixed-bearing and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: short-term results.

Authors:  Amar S Ranawat; Roberto Rossi; Ivano Loreti; Vijay J Rasquinha; Jose A Rodriguez; Chitranjan S Ranawat
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.757

  7 in total
  24 in total

1.  Mobile-bearing prosthesis did not improve mid-term clinical results of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shuichi Matsuda; Hideki Mizu-uchi; Shingo Fukagawa; Hiromasa Miura; Ken Okazaki; Hideo Matsuda; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Relationship between joint gap difference and range of motion in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised study between different platforms.

Authors:  Hiroshi Higuchi; Kazuhisa Hatayama; Masaki Shimizu; Atsushi Kobayashi; Tsutomu Kobayashi; Kenji Takagishi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  A 5 to 8 year follow-up study of the Rotaglide mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alastair Hudd; Kumar Kunasingam; David Ricketts; John Bush
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Mid-term results with a highly congruous mobile-bearing knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Roger G Lemaire
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Farshid Ejtehadi; Rachel Nichols; Leigh Davies; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Functional outcome of PFC Sigma fixed and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Birgit Hanusch; Thai Nurn Lou; Gary Warriner; Anthony Hui; Paul Gregg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  No difference between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in activities of daily living and pain: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Joicemar Tarouco Amaro; Gustavo Gonçalves Arliani; Diego Costa Astur; Pedro Debieux; Camila Cohen Kaleka; Moises Cohen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Maxime Huys; Jacques Pariat; François Roubineau; Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette; Arnaud Dubory
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Gait analysis and electromyography in fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a prospective, comparative study.

Authors:  Carsten O Tibesku; Kiriakos Daniilidis; Adrian Skwara; Tobias Dierkes; Dieter Rosenbaum; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Early clinical outcomes of floating platform mobile-bearing TKA: longitudinal comparison with fixed-bearing TKA.

Authors:  Tae Kyun Kim; Chong Bum Chang; Yeon Gwi Kang; Byung June Chung; Hyung Joon Cho; Sang Cheol Seong
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.