Literature DB >> 9418625

Differences in patellar tracking and knee kinematics among three different total knee designs.

J T Chew1, N J Stewart, A D Hanssen, Z P Luo, J A Rand, K N An.   

Abstract

Patellar complications are the primary reason for reoperation of the current condylar type designs. The aim of this study was to compare patellar tracking of various knee implant designs: Genesis II NexGen, and the P.F.C. Sigma Modular Knee System regarding trochlear groove center curvature. Nine unembalmed whole cadaveric lower extremities were used. The quadriceps and hamstrings were dissected into their individual muscles and loads were applied onto the muscles proximally based on the cross sectional area of the muscles. The three-dimensional kinematics of the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joint of the intact knee were measured using a 3Space tracking system. Three implants (one from each company) were implanted onto the same cadaveric knee in random order consecutively. This was done to ensure consistency of the soft tissue constraints in influencing the amount of patellar tracking. Patellar rotation, patellar tilting, patellar lateral shift and patellar displacement in relation to groove center were measured. There was no significant difference between the intact knee and the various implants regarding patellar rotation and lateral shift. However, all three prosthetic designs showed a significant degree of lateral tilting when compared with the intact knee. At 60 degrees knee flexion, the normal patella was tilted laterally to 0.44 degree +/- 2.15 degrees as compared with the Genesis II patella at 4.75 degrees +/- 4.81 degrees, the NexGen patella at 4.85 degrees +/- 4.81 degrees, and the P.F.C. Sigma patella at 4.89 degrees +/- 3.79 degrees lateral tilt. There was no difference between the intact knee compared with the resurfaced patella in patellar displacement in relation to the groove center. This study suggests the relatively similar kinematic behavior between the implant designs as compared with the intact knees. However, additional modification of implant geometry may be required to help decrease the amount of patellar tilt.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9418625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  38 in total

1.  Three- to six-year follow-up results after high-flexion total knee arthroplasty: can we allow passive deep knee bending?

Authors:  Sung-Do Cho; Yoon-Seok Youm; Ki-Bong Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Is it possible to re-establish pre-operative patellar kinematics using a ligament-balanced technique in total knee arthroplasty? A cadaveric investigation.

Authors:  Armin Keshmiri; Hans Springorum; Clemens Baier; Florian Zeman; Joachim Grifka; Günther Maderbacher
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Bony and cartilaginous anatomy of the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  K Tecklenburg; D Dejour; C Hoser; C Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Asymmetrical total knee arthroplasty does not improve patella tracking: a study without patella resurfacing.

Authors:  Marco Barink; Huub Meijerink; Nico Verdonschot; Albert van Kampen; Maarten de Waal Malefijt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: comparison study at 1 year after surgery.

Authors:  Seong Il Bin; Tae Seok Nam
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Patellofemoral kinematics during deep knee flexion after total knee replacement: a computational simulation.

Authors:  Chang-Hung Huang; Lin-I Hsu; Kun-Jhih Lin; Ting-Kuo Chang; Cheng-Kung Cheng; Yung-Chang Lu; Chen-Sheng Chen; Chun-Hsiung Huang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  No difference in patellar tracking between symmetrical and asymmetrical femoral component designs in TKA.

Authors:  J E Stoddard; D J Deehan; A M J Bull; A W McCaskie; A A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Evaluation of patellofemoral joint in ADVANCE Medial-pivot total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nobuaki Chinzei; Kazunari Ishida; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Yuichi Kuroda; Atsushi Kitagawa; Ryosuke Kuroda; Toshihiro Akisue; Kotaro Nishida; Masahiro Kurosaka; Nobuhiro Tsumura
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Results of total knee replacement with/without resurfacing of the patella.

Authors:  Abdul Khan; Nikhil Pradhan
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.513

10.  Influence of total knee arthroplasty on patellar kinematics and contact characteristics.

Authors:  Hans Kainz; Wolfgang Reng; Peter Augat; Simone Wurm
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.