Literature DB >> 17407895

Examination of bone-conducted transmission from sound field excitation measured by thresholds, ear-canal sound pressure, and skull vibrations.

Sabine Reinfeldt1, Stefan Stenfelt, Tobias Good, Bo Håkansson.   

Abstract

Bone conduction (BC) relative to air conduction (AC) sound field sensitivity is here defined as the perceived difference between a sound field transmitted to the ear by BC and by AC. Previous investigations of BC-AC sound field sensitivity have used different estimation methods and report estimates that vary by up to 20 dB at some frequencies. In this study, the BC-AC sound field sensitivity was investigated by hearing threshold shifts, ear canal sound pressure measurements, and skull bone vibrations measured with an accelerometer. The vibration measurement produced valid estimates at 400 Hz and below, the threshold shifts produced valid estimates at 500 Hz and above, while the ear canal sound pressure measurements were found erroneous for estimating the BC-AC sound field sensitivity. The BC-AC sound field sensitivity is proposed, by combining the present result with others, as frequency independent at 50 to 60 dB at frequencies up to 900 Hz. At higher frequencies, it is frequency dependent with minima of 40 to 50 dB at 2 and 8 kHz, and a maximum of 50 to 60 dB at 4 kHz. The BC-AC sound field sensitivity is the theoretical limit of maximum attenuation achievable with ordinary hearing protection devices.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17407895     DOI: 10.1121/1.2434762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Ossicular resonance modes of the human middle ear for bone and air conduction.

Authors:  Kenji Homma; Yu Du; Yoshitaka Shimizu; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Non-organic hearing loss: new and confirmed findings.

Authors:  Alexandra Holenweg; Martin Kompis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Hearing without a tympanic ear.

Authors:  Grace Capshaw; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.308

4.  Middle-ear function at high frequencies quantified with advanced bone-conduction measures.

Authors:  Gerald R Popelka; Goutham Telukuntla; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of ear-canal pressurization on middle-ear bone- and air-conduction responses.

Authors:  Kenji Homma; Yoshitaka Shimizu; Namkeun Kim; Yu Du; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 6.  New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review.

Authors:  Sabine Reinfeldt; Bo Håkansson; Hamidreza Taghavi; Måns Eeg-Olofsson
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-01-16

7.  Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.

Authors:  Shai Chordekar; Cahtia Adelman; Haim Sohmer; Liat Kishon-Rabin
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

8.  Using auditory steady-state responses for measuring hearing protector occlusion effect.

Authors:  Olivier Valentin; Frédéric Laville
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.867

9.  A three-dimensional finite-element model of a human dry skull for bone-conduction hearing.

Authors:  Namkeun Kim; You Chang; Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Internally coupled ears in living mammals.

Authors:  Matthew J Mason
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 2.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.