Literature DB >> 17199143

A network approach for distinguishing ethical issues in research and development.

Sjoerd D Zwart1, Ibo van de Poel, Harald van Mil, Michiel Brumsen.   

Abstract

In this paper we report on our experiences with using network analysis to discern and analyse ethical issues in research into, and the development of, a new wastewater treatment technology. Using network analysis, we preliminarily interpreted some of our observations in a Group Decision Room (GDR) session where we invited important stakeholders to think about the risks of this new technology. We show how a network approach is useful for understanding the observations, and suggests some relevant ethical issues. We argue that a network approach is also useful for ethical analysis of issues in other fields of research and development. The abandoning of the overarching rationality assumption, which is central to network approaches, does not have to lead to ethical relativism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17199143     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-006-0063-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  8 in total

1.  Parallel, embedded or just part of the team: ethicists cooperating within a European security research project.

Authors:  A van Gorp; S van der Molen
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Methods for Practising Ethics in Research and Innovation: A Literature Review, Critical Analysis and Recommendations.

Authors:  Wessel Reijers; David Wright; Philip Brey; Karsten Weber; Rowena Rodrigues; Declan O'Sullivan; Bert Gordijn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Multidisciplinary Engagement with Nanoethics Through Education-The Nanobio-RAISE Advanced Courses as a Case Study and Model.

Authors:  Daan Schuurbiers; Susanne Sleenhoff; Johannes F Jacobs; Patricia Osseweijer
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 0.917

4.  Emotional engineers: toward morally responsible design.

Authors:  Sabine Roeser
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab [corrected]: Applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory.

Authors:  Daan Schuurbiers
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  What makes a good home-based nocturnal seizure detector? A value sensitive design.

Authors:  Judith van Andel; Frans Leijten; Hans van Delden; Ghislaine van Thiel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Rawlsian approach to distribute responsibilities in networks.

Authors:  Neelke Doorn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Responsibility ascriptions in technology development and engineering: three perspectives.

Authors:  Neelke Doorn
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.525

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.