Literature DB >> 19933644

CT colonography with decreased purgation: balancing preparation, performance, and patient acceptance.

Shmuel Mahgerefteh1, Shifra Fraifeld, Arye Blachar, Jacob Sosna.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reduction or elimination of catharsis with fecal tagging enhances the tolerability of CT colonography (CTC) and may increase compliance with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations. We systematically reviewed studies that prospectively evaluated performance and patient satisfaction with decreased-purgation CTC and with optical colonoscopy.
CONCLUSION: The nine studies reviewed showed moderate-to-good performance for decreased-purgation CTC; however, data are limited, and study design and data presentation are inconsistent. Further study of decreased-purgation CTC and standardization of terminology are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19933644     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  9 in total

1.  Automated image-based colon cleansing for laxative-free CT colonography computer-aided polyp detection.

Authors:  Marius George Linguraru; Neil Panjwani; Joel G Fletcher; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Evidence review and status update on computed tomography colonography.

Authors:  Darren Boone; Steve Halligan; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-10

3.  Evaluation of two minimal-preparation regimes for CT colonography: optimising image quality and patient acceptability.

Authors:  A Pollentine; A Mortimer; P McCoubrie; L Archer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Acceptability of oral iodinated contrast media: a head-to-head comparison of four media.

Authors:  A Pollentine; E Ngan-Soo; P McCoubrie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Virtual colonoscopy: Utility, impact and overview.

Authors:  Dhakshina Ganeshan; Khaled M Elsayes; David Vining
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-28

6.  Reduced cathartic bowel preparation for CT colonography: prospective comparison of 2-L polyethylene glycol and magnesium citrate.

Authors:  Alexander W Keedy; Judy Yee; Rizwan Aslam; Stefanie Weinstein; Luis A Landeras; Janak N Shah; Kenneth R McQuaid; Benjamin M Yeh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Pilot study on efficacy of reduced cathartic bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol and bisacodyl.

Authors:  Zhi-Yuan Chen; He-Song Shen; Ming-Yue Luo; Chai-Jie Duan; Wen-Li Cai; Hong-Bing Lu; Guo-Peng Zhang; Yang Liu; Jerome Z Liang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Non- or full-laxative CT colonography vs. endoscopic tests for colorectal cancer screening: a randomised survey comparing public perceptions and intentions to undergo testing.

Authors:  Alex Ghanouni; Steve Halligan; Andrew Plumb; Darren Boone; Jane Wardle; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Quantifying public preferences for different bowel preparation options prior to screening CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Alex Ghanouni; Steve Halligan; Stuart A Taylor; Darren Boone; Andrew Plumb; Sandro Stoffel; Stephen Morris; Guiqing Lily Yao; Shihua Zhu; Richard Lilford; Jane Wardle; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.