Literature DB >> 21773705

Evidence review and status update on computed tomography colonography.

Darren Boone1, Steve Halligan, Stuart A Taylor.   

Abstract

Computed tomographic (CT) colonography is being implemented increasingly in the USA and Europe, and in many centers it has become the radiological technique of choice for imaging the whole colorectum. Although high diagnostic accuracy has been demonstrated in both screening and symptomatic populations, controversy persists regarding implementation, who should interpret the examination, and its cost effectiveness, particularly in the context of primary colorectal cancer screening. Published research in recent years has demonstrated efficacy in a wide range of patient groups, striking technical improvements, and high levels of patient acceptability. New developments continue in the fields of computer aided detection, digital cleansing, and integration into positron emission tomography. The purpose of this review is to bring the reader up-to-date with the latest developments in CT colonography, in particular, those of the last year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21773705     DOI: 10.1007/s11894-011-0217-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep        ISSN: 1522-8037


  49 in total

1.  Editorial: CTC interpretation by gastroenterologists: feasible but largely impractical, undesirable, and misguided.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  CT colonography with decreased purgation: balancing preparation, performance, and patient acceptance.

Authors:  Shmuel Mahgerefteh; Shifra Fraifeld; Arye Blachar; Jacob Sosna
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Flat (nonpolypoid) colorectal lesions identified at CT colonography in a U.S. screening population.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; David H Kim; Jessica B Robbins
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  CT colonography: who attends training? A survey of participants at educational workshops.

Authors:  D Boone; S Halligan; R Frost; C Kay; A Laghi; P Lefere; E Neri; J Stoker; S A Taylor
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Nonlaxative PET/CT colonography: feasibility, acceptability, and pilot performance in patients at higher risk of colonic neoplasia.

Authors:  Stuart A Taylor; Jamshed B Bomanji; Levi Manpanzure; Charlotte Robinson; Ashley M Groves; John Dickson; Nickolaos D Papathanasiou; Rebecca Greenhalgh; Peter J Ell; Steve Halligan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Analysis of barriers to and patients' preferences for CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening in a nonadherent urban population.

Authors:  Wendy Ho; Darcy E Broughton; Karen Donelan; G Scott Gazelle; Chin Hur
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Electronic cleansing for CT colonography: does it help CAD software performance in a high-risk population for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Jae Yeon Wi; Se Hyung Kim; Jae Young Lee; Sang Gyun Kim; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial.

Authors:  Abraham H Dachman; Nancy A Obuchowski; Jeffrey W Hoffmeister; J Louis Hinshaw; Michael I Frew; Thomas C Winter; Robert L Van Uitert; Senthil Periaswamy; Ronald M Summers; Bruce J Hillman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Bowel preparation in CT colonography: electrolyte and renal function disturbances in the frail and elderly patient.

Authors:  Patrick Mc Laughlin; Joseph Eustace; Sean Mc Sweeney; Sebastian Mc Williams; Kevin O'Regan; Michael O'Connor; Denis Kelly; Michael M Maher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Jensch; Shandra Bipat; Jan Peringa; Ayso H de Vries; Anneke Heutinck; Evelien Dekker; Lubbertus C Baak; Alexander D Montauban van Swijndregt; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  5 in total

1.  Virtual colonoscopy: Utility, impact and overview.

Authors:  Dhakshina Ganeshan; Khaled M Elsayes; David Vining
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-28

2.  The future developments in gastrointestinal radiology.

Authors:  Emma L Helbren; Andrew A Plumb; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-31

3.  Critical Role of p53 and K-ras in the Diagnosis of Early Colorectal Cancer: a One-year, Single-center Analysis.

Authors:  Hui-Ying Lu; Ri-Tian Lin; Guang-Xi Zhou; Tian-Ming Yu; Zhan-Ju Liu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 4.  Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography for the detection of colonic neoplasia after positive faecal occult blood testing: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew A Plumb; Steve Halligan; Douglas A Pendsé; Stuart A Taylor; Susan Mallett
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Quantifying public preferences for different bowel preparation options prior to screening CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Alex Ghanouni; Steve Halligan; Stuart A Taylor; Darren Boone; Andrew Plumb; Sandro Stoffel; Stephen Morris; Guiqing Lily Yao; Shihua Zhu; Richard Lilford; Jane Wardle; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.