Literature DB >> 23382637

Pilot study on efficacy of reduced cathartic bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol and bisacodyl.

Zhi-Yuan Chen1, He-Song Shen, Ming-Yue Luo, Chai-Jie Duan, Wen-Li Cai, Hong-Bing Lu, Guo-Peng Zhang, Yang Liu, Jerome Z Liang.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of reduced cathartic bowel preparation with 2 L polyethylene glycol (PEG)-4000 electrolyte solution and 10 mg bisacodyl enteric-coated tablets for computed tomographic colonography (CTC).
METHODS: Sixty subjects who gave informed consent were randomly assigned to study group A, study group B or the control group. On the day prior to CTC, subjects in study group A were given 20 mL 40% wt/vol barium sulfate suspension before 3 mealtimes, 60 mL 60% diatrizoate meglumine diluted in 250 mL water after supper, and 10 mg bisacodyl enteric-coated tablets 1 h before oral administration of 2 L PEG-4000 electrolyte solution. Subjects in study group B were treated identically to those in study group A, with the exception of bisacodyl which was given 1 h after oral PEG-4000. Subjects in the control group were managed using the same strategy as the subjects in study group A, but without administration of bisacodyl. Residual stool and fluid scores, the attenuation value of residual fluid, and discomfort during bowel preparation in the three groups were analyzed statistically.
RESULTS: The mean scores for residual stool and fluid in study group A were lower than those in study group B, but the differences were not statistically significant. Subjects in study group A showed greater stool and fluid cleansing ability than the subjects in study group B. The mean scores for residual stool and fluid in study groups A and B were lower than those in the control group, and were significantly different. There was no significant difference in the mean attenuation value of residual fluid between study group A, study group B and the control group. The total discomfort index during bowel preparation was 46, 45 and 45 in the three groups, respectively, with no significant difference.
CONCLUSION: Administration of 10 mg bisacodyl enteric-coated tablets prior to or after oral administration of 2 L PEG-4000 electrolyte solution enhances stool and fluid cleansing ability, and has no impact on the attenuation value of residual fluid or the discomfort index. The former is an excellent alternative for CTC colorectum cleansing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bisacodyl; Colorectal cancer; Computed tomographic colonography; Polyethylene glycol; Screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23382637      PMCID: PMC3558582          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  34 in total

1.  Image quality and patient acceptance of four regimens with different amounts of mild laxatives for CT colonography.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Jensch; Ayso H de Vries; Dennis Pot; Jan Peringa; Shandra Bipat; Jasper Florie; Rogier E van Gelder; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Jensch; Ayso H de Vries; Jan Peringa; Shandra Bipat; Evelien Dekker; Lubbertus C Baak; Joep F Bartelsman; Anneke Heutinck; Alexander D Montauban van Swijndregt; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance.

Authors:  Philippe A Lefere; Stefaan S Gryspeerdt; Jef Dewyspelaere; Marc Baekelandt; Bartel G Van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers.

Authors:  C Daniel Johnson; Mei-Hsiu Chen; Alicia Y Toledano; Jay P Heiken; Abraham Dachman; Mark D Kuo; Christine O Menias; Betina Siewert; Jugesh I Cheema; Richard G Obregon; Jeff L Fidler; Peter Zimmerman; Karen M Horton; Kevin Coakley; Revathy B Iyer; Amy K Hara; Robert A Halvorsen; Giovanna Casola; Judy Yee; Benjamin A Herman; Lawrence J Burgart; Paul J Limburg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance.

Authors:  Koichi Nagata; Tomohiko Okawa; Akihiro Honma; Shungo Endo; Shin-ei Kudo; Hiroyuki Yoshida
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy.

Authors:  Christian Ell; Wolfgang Fischbach; Hans-Joachim Bronisch; Stefan Dertinger; Peter Layer; Michael Rünzi; Thomas Schneider; Günther Kachel; Jörg Grüger; Michael Köllinger; Waltraud Nagell; Karl-Josel Goerg; Roland Wanitschke; Hans-Jürgen Gruss
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Public perceptions and preferences for CT colonography or colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Alex Ghanouni; Samuel G Smith; Steve Halligan; Andrew Plumb; Darren Boone; Molly Sweeney Magee; Jane Wardle; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-06-16

8.  CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging.

Authors:  Stuart A Taylor; Andrew Slater; David N Burling; Emily Tam; Rebecca Greenhalgh; Louise Gartner; Julia Scarth; Robert Pearce; Paul Bassett; Steve Halligan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Efficacy of barium-based fecal tagging for CT colonography: a comparison between the use of high and low density barium suspensions in a Korean population - a preliminary study.

Authors:  Min Ju Kim; Seong Ho Park; Seung Soo Lee; Jeong Sik Byeon; Eugene K Choi; Jung Hoon Kim; Yeoung Nam Kim; Ah Young Kim; Hyun Kwon Ha
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Feasibility study of computed tomography colonography using limited bowel preparation at normal and low-dose levels study.

Authors:  Jasper Florie; Rogier E van Gelder; Michiel P Schutter; Adrienne van Randen; Henk W Venema; Steven de Jager; Victor P M van der Hulst; Anna Prent; Shandra Bipat; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Lubbertus C Baak; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pilot study on image quality and radiation dose of CT colonography with adaptive iterative dose reduction three-dimensional.

Authors:  Hesong Shen; Dan Liang; Mingyue Luo; Chaijie Duan; Wenli Cai; Shanshan Zhu; Jianping Qiu; Wenru Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Effect of dose splitting of a low-volume bowel preparation macrogol-based solution on CT colonography tagging quality.

Authors:  Francesco Mistretta; Nicolò Damiani; Delia Campanella; Simone Mazzetti; Alessia Gulino; Giovanni Cappello; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.313

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.