Literature DB >> 22422379

Evaluation of two minimal-preparation regimes for CT colonography: optimising image quality and patient acceptability.

A Pollentine1, A Mortimer, P McCoubrie, L Archer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare a 2 day bowel preparation regime of barium, iodine and a mild stimulant laxative with a 1 day iodine-only regime for CT colonography (CTC).
METHODS: 100 consecutive patients underwent CTC. The first 50 patients (Regime 1) ingested 1 bisacodyl tablet twice a day 3 days before CTC and 1 dose each of 50 ml of barium and 20 ml of iodinated contrast per day starting 2 days before CTC. The second 50 patients (Regime 2) ingested 3 doses of iodinated contrast over 24 h prior to CTC. Volumes of residual stool and fluid, and the effectiveness of stool and fluid tagging, were graded according to methods established by Taylor et al (Taylor S, Slaker A, Burling D, Tam E, Greenhalgh R, Gartner L, et al. CT colonography: optimisation, diagnostic performance and patient acceptability of reduced-laxative regimens using barium-based faecal tagging. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 32-42). A 3 day low-residue diet was taken by both cohorts. Questionnaires rating the side-effects and burden of the bowel preparation were compared to a control cohort of patients undergoing barium enema.
RESULTS: The proportion of colons producing none/scattered stool (score 1) was 90.3% with Regime 1 and 65.0% with Regime 2 (p<0.005). Any residual stool was significantly better tagged with Regime 1 (score 5), with 91.7% of Regime 1 exhibiting optimum tagging vs 71.3% of Regime 2 (p<0.05). No significant differences in side-effects between the bowel preparation regimes for CTC were elicited. Bowel preparation for barium enema was tolerated significantly worse than both of the CTC bowel preparation regimes.
CONCLUSION: Regime 1, containing a 3 day preparation of a mild laxative, barium and iodine, produced a significantly better prepared colon, with no difference in patient acceptability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22422379      PMCID: PMC3587090          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/22421731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  27 in total

1.  CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study.

Authors:  M R Callstrom; C D Johnson; J G Fletcher; J E Reed; D A Ahlquist; W S Harmsen; K Tait; L A Wilson; K E Corcoran
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  CT colonography: digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction initial observations.

Authors:  Michael E Zalis; James Perumpillichira; Chiara Del Frate; Peter F Hahn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Bowel preparation at home: prospective study of adverse effects in elderly people.

Authors:  T D Heymann; K Chopra; E Nunn; L Coulter; D Westaby; I M Murray-Lyon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

4.  Variables in the preparation of the large intestine for double contrast barium enema examination.

Authors:  J R Lee; J R Ferrando
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  CT colonography: patient tolerance of laxative free fecal tagging regimen versus traditional cathartic cleansing.

Authors:  Duccio Buccicardi; Massimo Grosso; Ilaria Caviglia; Alessandro Gastaldo; Sabrina Carbone; Emanuele Neri; Carlo Bartolozzi; Piergiorgio Quadri
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2011-10

6.  Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences.

Authors:  Thomas M Gluecker; C Daniel Johnson; William S Harmsen; Kenneth P Offord; Ann M Harris; Lynn A Wilson; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance.

Authors:  Philippe A Lefere; Stefaan S Gryspeerdt; Jef Dewyspelaere; Marc Baekelandt; Bartel G Van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study.

Authors:  Rogier E van Gelder; Erwin Birnie; Jasper Florie; Michiel P Schutter; Joep F Bartelsman; Pleun Snel; Johan S Laméris; Gouke J Bonsel; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Gavin C Harewood; Maurits J Wiersema; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation.

Authors:  Stephen L Ristvedt; Elizabeth G McFarland; Leonard B Weinstock; Eric P Thyssen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  7 in total

1.  Patients' experience of screening CT colonography with reduced and full bowel preparation in a randomised trial.

Authors:  Lapo Sali; Leonardo Ventura; Grazia Grazzini; Alessandra Borgheresi; Silvia Delsanto; Massimo Falchini; Beatrice Mallardi; Paola Mantellini; Stefano Milani; Stefano Pallanti; Marco Zappa; Mario Mascalchi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Acceptability of oral iodinated contrast media: a head-to-head comparison of four media.

Authors:  A Pollentine; E Ngan-Soo; P McCoubrie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Bowel cleansing before CT colonography: comparison between two minimal-preparation regimens.

Authors:  F Iafrate; M Iannitti; M Ciolina; P Baldassari; A Pichi; A Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Bowel preparation in CT colonography: Is diet restriction necessary? A randomised trial (DIETSAN).

Authors:  Davide Bellini; Domenico De Santis; Damiano Caruso; Marco Rengo; Riccardo Ferrari; Tommaso Biondi; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Pilot study on efficacy of reduced cathartic bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol and bisacodyl.

Authors:  Zhi-Yuan Chen; He-Song Shen; Ming-Yue Luo; Chai-Jie Duan; Wen-Li Cai; Hong-Bing Lu; Guo-Peng Zhang; Yang Liu; Jerome Z Liang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Computed tomography colonography in 2014: an update on technique and indications.

Authors:  Andrea Laghi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Low-volume reduced bowel preparation regimen for CT colonography: a randomized noninferiority trial.

Authors:  Davide Bellini; Nicola Panvini; Simone Vicini; Marco Rengo; Paola Lucchesi; Damiano Caruso; Iacopo Carbone; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-06-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.