Literature DB >> 19924556

Environmental risk assessments for transgenic crops producing output trait enzymes.

Alan Raybould1, Ann Tuttle, Scott Shore, Terry Stone.   

Abstract

The environmental risks from cultivating crops producing output trait enzymes can be rigorously assessed by testing conservative risk hypotheses of no harm to endpoints such as the abundance of wildlife, crop yield and the rate of degradation of crop residues in soil. These hypotheses can be tested with data from many sources, including evaluations of the agronomic performance and nutritional quality of the crop made during product development, and information from the scientific literature on the mode-of-action, taxonomic distribution and environmental fate of the enzyme. Few, if any, specific ecotoxicology or environmental fate studies are needed. The effective use of existing data means that regulatory decision-making, to which an environmental risk assessment provides essential information, is not unnecessarily complicated by evaluation of large amounts of new data that provide negligible improvement in the characterization of risk, and that may delay environmental benefits offered by transgenic crops containing output trait enzymes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19924556      PMCID: PMC2902732          DOI: 10.1007/s11248-009-9343-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  29 in total

Review 1.  Tiered tests to assess the environmental risk of fitness changes in hybrids between transgenic crops and wild relatives: the example of virus resistant Brassica napus.

Authors:  Alan Raybould; Ian Cooper
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep

Review 2.  Substantial equivalence--an appropriate paradigm for the safety assessment of genetically modified foods?

Authors:  Harry A Kuiper; Gijs A Kleter; Hub P J M Noteborn; Esther J Kok
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2002-12-27       Impact factor: 4.221

3.  Classification and evolution of alpha-amylase genes in plants.

Authors:  N Huang; G L Stebbins; R L Rodriguez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Animal nutrition with feeds from genetically modified plants.

Authors:  Gerhard Flachowsky; Andrew Chesson; Karen Aulrich
Journal:  Arch Anim Nutr       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 5.  Plant genetic engineering to improve biomass characteristics for biofuels.

Authors:  Mariam Sticklen
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 9.740

6.  Problem formulation and hypothesis testing for environmental risk assessments of genetically modified crops.

Authors:  Alan Raybould
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2007-03-17

7.  Planning environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops: problem formulation for stress-tolerant crops.

Authors:  Thomas E Nickson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Evaluation of transgenic hybrid corn (VIP3A) in broiler chickens.

Authors:  J Brake; M Faust; J Stein
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Primary structure of human pancreatic alpha-amylase gene: its comparison with human salivary alpha-amylase gene.

Authors:  A Horii; M Emi; N Tomita; T Nishide; M Ogawa; T Mori; K Matsubara
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.688

10.  Microbial community utilization of recalcitrant and simple carbon compounds: impact of oak-woodland plant communities.

Authors:  Mark P Waldrop; Mary K Firestone
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-11-12       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  10 in total

1.  Assessing the ecological risks from the persistence and spread of feral populations of insect-resistant transgenic maize.

Authors:  Alan Raybould; Laura S Higgins; Michael J Horak; Raymond J Layton; Nicholas P Storer; Juan Manuel De La Fuente; Rod A Herman
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  The substantive equivalence of transgenic (Bt and Chi) and non-transgenic cotton based on metabolite profiles.

Authors:  Bentol Hoda Modirroosta; Masoud Tohidfar; Jalal Saba; Foad Moradi
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 3.410

3.  Molecular-based environmental risk assessment of three varieties of genetically engineered cows.

Authors:  Jianxiang Xu; Jie Zhao; Jianwu Wang; Yaofeng Zhao; Lei Zhang; Mingxing Chu; Ning Li
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Non-target organism effects tests on Vip3A and their application to the ecological risk assessment for cultivation of MIR162 maize.

Authors:  Alan Raybould; Demetra Vlachos
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Protection goals in environmental risk assessment: a practical approach.

Authors:  Monica Garcia-Alonso; Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 6.  Bt-maize event MON 88017 expressing Cry3Bb1 does not cause harm to non-target organisms.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Adinda De Schrijver; Patrick De Clercq; József Kiss; Jörg Romeis
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Richard L Hellmich; Marco P Candolfi; Keri Carstens; Adinda De Schrijver; Angharad M R Gatehouse; Rod A Herman; Joseph E Huesing; Morven A McLean; Alan Raybould; Anthony M Shelton; Annabel Waggoner
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.788

8.  Genetically modified crops and aquatic ecosystems: considerations for environmental risk assessment and non-target organism testing.

Authors:  Keri Carstens; Jennifer Anderson; Pamela Bachman; Adinda De Schrijver; Galen Dively; Brian Federici; Mick Hamer; Marco Gielkens; Peter Jensen; William Lamp; Stefan Rauschen; Geoff Ridley; Jörg Romeis; Annabel Waggoner
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Environmental risk assessment of GE plants under low-exposure conditions.

Authors:  Andrew Roberts; Yann Devos; Alan Raybould; Patrick Bigelow; Alan Gray
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 10.  Genetically engineered trees for plantation forests: key considerations for environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Hely Häggman; Alan Raybould; Aluizio Borem; Thomas Fox; Levis Handley; Magnus Hertzberg; Meng-Zu Lu; Philip Macdonald; Taichi Oguchi; Giancarlo Pasquali; Les Pearson; Gary Peter; Hector Quemada; Armand Séguin; Kylie Tattersall; Eugênio Ulian; Christian Walter; Morven McLean
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 9.803

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.