Literature DB >> 21221780

Molecular-based environmental risk assessment of three varieties of genetically engineered cows.

Jianxiang Xu1, Jie Zhao, Jianwu Wang, Yaofeng Zhao, Lei Zhang, Mingxing Chu, Ning Li.   

Abstract

The development of animal biotechnology has led to an increase in attention to biosafety issues. Here we evaluated the impact of genetically engineered cows on the environment. The probability of horizontal gene transfer and the impact on the microbial communities in cow gut and soil were tested using three varieties of genetically engineered cows that were previously transformed with a human gene encoding lysozyme, lactoferrin, or human alpha lactalbumin. The results showed that the transgenes were not detectable by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or quantitative real-time PCR in gut microbial DNA extracts of manure or microbial DNA extracts of topsoil. In addition, the transgenes had no impact on the microbial communities in cow gut or soil as assessed by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis or 16S rDNA sequencing. Furthermore, phylogenetic analyses showed that the manure bacteria sampled during each of the four seasons belonged primarily to two groups, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, and the soil bacteria belonged to four groups, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and α-proteobacteria. Other groups, such as β-proteobacteria, γ-proteobacteria, δ-proteobacteria, ε-proteobacteria, Spirochaetes, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, and Nitrospira, were not dominant in the manure or soil.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21221780     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-010-9477-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  46 in total

Review 1.  Transgenesis may affect farm animal welfare: a case for systematic risk assessment.

Authors:  C G Van Reenen; T H Meuwissen; H Hopster; K Oldenbroek; T H Kruip; H J Blokhuis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  DNA extraction method affects microbial community profiles from soils and sediment.

Authors:  Cora Carrigg; Olivia Rice; Siobhán Kavanagh; Gavin Collins; Vincent O'Flaherty
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Evaluation of nested PCR-DGGE (denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis) with group-specific 16S rRNA primers for the analysis of bacterial communities from different wastewater treatment plants.

Authors:  Nico Boon; Wim Windt; Willy Verstraete; Eva M Top
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 4.194

Review 4.  Horizontal gene transfer from transgenic plants to terrestrial bacteria--a rare event?

Authors:  K M Nielsen; A M Bones; K Smalla; J D van Elsas
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 16.408

5.  Health status of transgenic pigs expressing the human complement regulatory protein CD59.

Authors:  Stefanie Deppenmeier; Oliver Bock; Michael Mengel; Heiner Niemann; Wilfried Kues; Erika Lemme; Dagmar Wirth; Kurt Wonigeit; Hans Kreipe
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 6.  Gut microorganisms, mammalian metabolism and personalized health care.

Authors:  Jeremy K Nicholson; Elaine Holmes; Ian D Wilson
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 60.633

7.  A multinational study of alpha-lactalbumin concentrations in human milk.

Authors:  Joan G Jackson; Derek B Janszen; Bo Lonnerdal; Eric L Lien; Kathryn P Pramuk; Charles F Kuhlman
Journal:  J Nutr Biochem       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.048

8.  Fecal collection, ambient preservation, and DNA extraction for PCR amplification of bacterial and human markers from human feces.

Authors:  Jordan M Nechvatal; Jeffrey L Ram; Marc D Basson; Phanramphoei Namprachan; Stephanie R Niec; Kawsar Z Badsha; Larry H Matherly; Adhip P N Majumdar; Ikuko Kato
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.363

9.  In situ transfer of antibiotic resistance genes from transgenic (transplastomic) tobacco plants to bacteria.

Authors:  Elisabeth Kay; Timothy M Vogel; Frank Bertolla; Renaud Nalin; Pascal Simonet
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Molecular analysis of bacterial community structures in paddy soils for environmental risk assessment with two varieties of genetically modified rice, Iksan 483 and Milyang 204.

Authors:  Min-Cheol Kim; Jae-Hyung Ahn; Hye-Chul Shin; Taesung Kim; Tae-Hun Ryu; Dong-Hern Kim; Hong-Gyu Song; Geon Hyoung Lee; Jong-Ok Ka
Journal:  J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.351

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparative muscle proteomics/phosphoproteomics analysis provides new insight for the biosafety evaluation of fat-1 transgenic cattle.

Authors:  Xiangbo Xin; Xinfeng Liu; Xin Li; Xiangbin Ding; Shuping Yang; Congfei Jin; Guangpeng Li; Hong Guo
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  An Event-Specific Real-Time PCR Method for Measuring Transgenic Lysozyme Goat Content in Trace Samples.

Authors:  Wenting Xu; Jinjie Cui; Biao Liu; Litao Yang
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-04-23

3.  Effects of Genetically Modified Milk Containing Human Beta-Defensin-3 on Gastrointestinal Health of Mice.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Yange Yang; Zhaopeng Shi; Ming-Qing Gao; Yong Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Fungal pretreatment of raw digested piggery wastewater enhancing the survival of algae as biofuel feedstock.

Authors:  Junying Liu; Wen Qiu; Yunpu Wang
Journal:  Bioresour Bioprocess       Date:  2017-01-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.