Literature DB >> 17445509

Problem formulation and hypothesis testing for environmental risk assessments of genetically modified crops.

Alan Raybould1.   

Abstract

Environmental risk assessments can provide high confidence of minimal risk by testing theories, "risk hypotheses", that predict the likelihood of unacceptable harmful events. The creation of risk hypotheses and a plan to test them is called problem formulation. Effective problem formulation seeks to maximize the possibility of detecting effects that indicate potential risk; if such effects are not detected, minimal risk is indicated with high confidence. Two important implications are that artificial test conditions can increase confidence, whereas prescriptive data requirements can reduce confidence (increase uncertainty) if they constrain problem formulation. Poor problem formulation can increase environmental risk because it leads to the collection of superfluous data that may delay or prevent the introduction of environmentally beneficial products.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17445509     DOI: 10.1051/ebr:2007004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res        ISSN: 1635-7922


  32 in total

1.  Biofortified sorghum in Africa: using problem formulation to inform risk assessment.

Authors:  Karen E Hokanson; Norman C Ellstrand; Jeremy T Ouedraogo; Patrick A Olweny; Barbara A Schaal; Alan F Raybould
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Planning environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops: problem formulation for stress-tolerant crops.

Authors:  Thomas E Nickson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 3.  EFSA's scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Jaime Aguilera; Zoltán Diveki; Ana Gomes; Yi Liu; Claudia Paoletti; Patrick du Jardin; Lieve Herman; Joe N Perry; Elisabeth Waigmann
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Olivier Sanvido; Joyce Tait; Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  The policy chicken and the science egg. Has applied ecology failed the transgenic crops debate?

Authors:  A J Gray
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Environmental change challenges decision-making during post-market environmental monitoring of transgenic crops.

Authors:  Olivier Sanvido; Jörg Romeis; Franz Bigler
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Current risk assessment approaches for environmental and food and feed safety assessment.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

8.  Problem formulation and phenotypic characterisation for the development of novel crops.

Authors:  Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Advancing environmental risk assessment for transgenic biofeedstock crops.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt; Paul Keese; Alan Raybould; Julie W Fitzpatrick; Moisés Burachik; Alan Gray; Stephen S Olin; Joachim Schiemann; Mark Sears; Felicia Wu
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.788

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.