Literature DB >> 20839052

Non-target organism effects tests on Vip3A and their application to the ecological risk assessment for cultivation of MIR162 maize.

Alan Raybould1, Demetra Vlachos.   

Abstract

Transgenic crops producing insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) provide economic, environmental and health benefits by maintaining or increasing crop yields with fewer applications of insecticide. To sustain these benefits, it is important to delay the evolution of insect resistance to the proteins, and to ensure that the proteins do not harm non-target organisms, particularly those that may control secondary pests that would otherwise flourish because of reduced insecticide applications. Vip3A is a Bt vegetative insecticidal protein that is active against lepidopterous pests. It has a different mode of action from other proteins for control of Lepidoptera in current Bt crops, and when combined with these proteins, it should help to delay the evolution of pest resistance to Bt crops. This paper presents data on the effects of Vip3A on non-target organisms, and an ecological risk assessment of MIR162 maize, which expresses Vip3Aa20. Laboratory studies indicate few adverse effects of Vip3A to non-target organisms: 11 of 12 species tested showed no adverse effects when exposed to high concentrations of Vip3A relative to estimated exposures resulting from cultivation of MIR162 maize. Daphnia magna exposed to Vip3Aa20 were unaffected in terms of survival or fecundity, but grew slightly more slowly than unexposed controls. The data indicate that cultivation of MIR162 maize poses negligible risk to non-target organisms, and that crops producing Vip3A are unlikely to adversely affect biological control organisms such that benefits from reduced insecticide applications are lost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20839052     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-010-9442-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  25 in total

Review 1.  Regulating transgenic crops: a comparative analysis of different regulatory processes.

Authors:  Gregory Jaffe
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Brush border membrane binding properties of Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3A toxin to Heliothis virescens and Helicoverpa zea midguts.

Authors:  Mi Kyong Lee; Paul Miles; Jeng-Shong Chen
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Detlef Bartsch; Franz Bigler; Marco P Candolfi; Marco M C Gielkens; Susan E Hartley; Richard L Hellmich; Joseph E Huesing; Paul C Jepson; Raymond Layton; Hector Quemada; Alan Raybould; Robyn I Rose; Joachim Schiemann; Mark K Sears; Anthony M Shelton; Jeremy Sweet; Zigfridas Vaituzis; Jeffrey D Wolt
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Compositional assessment of transgenic crops: an idea whose time has passed.

Authors:  Rod A Herman; Bruce M Chassy; Wayne Parrott
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 5.  Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of bt transgenic plants.

Authors:  A M Shelton; J-Z Zhao; R T Roush
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.686

6.  Mirid bug outbreaks in multiple crops correlated with wide-scale adoption of Bt cotton in China.

Authors:  Yanhui Lu; Kongming Wu; Yuying Jiang; Bing Xia; Ping Li; Hongqiang Feng; Kris A G Wyckhuys; Yuyuan Guo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Insect resistance management for Syngenta's VipCot transgenic cotton.

Authors:  Ryan W Kurtz; Alan McCaffery; David O'Reilly
Journal:  J Invertebr Pathol       Date:  2007-03-25       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  A meta-analysis of effects of Bt cotton and maize on nontarget invertebrates.

Authors:  Michelle Marvier; Chanel McCreedy; James Regetz; Peter Kareiva
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Rapid evolution and the cost of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in greenhouse populations of cabbage loopers, Trichoplusia ni.

Authors:  Alida F Janmaat; Judith Myers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The mode of action of the Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative insecticidal protein Vip3A differs from that of Cry1Ab delta-endotoxin.

Authors:  Mi Kyong Lee; Frederick S Walters; Hope Hart; Narendra Palekar; Jeng-Shong Chen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  19 in total

1.  Influence of transgenic rice expressing a fused Cry1Ab/1Ac protein on frogs in paddy fields.

Authors:  Jia-Mei Wang; Xiu-Ping Chen; Yu-Yong Liang; Hao-Jun Zhu; Jia-Tong Ding; Yu-Fa Peng
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Potential use of an arthropod database to support the non-target risk assessment and monitoring of transgenic plants.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Michael Meissle; Fernando Alvarez-Alfageme; Franz Bigler; David A Bohan; Yann Devos; Louise A Malone; Xavier Pons; Stefan Rauschen
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Marker-free transgenic rice expressing the vegetative insecticidal protein (Vip) of Bacillus thuringiensis shows broad insecticidal properties.

Authors:  Subrata Pradhan; Anirban Chakraborty; Narattam Sikdar; Saikat Chakraborty; Jagannath Bhattacharyya; Joy Mitra; Anulina Manna; Snehasish Dutta Gupta; Soumitra Kumar Sen
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  Protection goals in environmental risk assessment: a practical approach.

Authors:  Monica Garcia-Alonso; Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Development of broad-spectrum and sustainable resistance in cotton against major insects through the combination of Bt and plant lectin genes.

Authors:  Salah Ud Din; Saira Azam; Abdul Qayyum Rao; Mohsin Shad; Mukhtar Ahmed; Ambreen Gul; Ayesha Latif; Muhammad Azam Ali; Tayyab Husnain; Ahmad Ali Shahid
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.570

6.  A comprehensive assessment of the effects of Bt cotton on Coleomegilla maculata demonstrates no detrimental effects by Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab.

Authors:  Yunhe Li; Jörg Romeis; Ping Wang; Yufa Peng; Anthony M Shelton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The food and environmental safety of Bt crops.

Authors:  Michael S Koch; Jason M Ward; Steven L Levine; James A Baum; John L Vicini; Bruce G Hammond
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Nontarget organism effects tests on eCry3.1Ab and their application to the ecological risk assessment for cultivation of Event 5307 maize.

Authors:  Andrea Burns; Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Characterising microbial protein test substances and establishing their equivalence with plant-produced proteins for use in risk assessments of transgenic crops.

Authors:  Alan Raybould; Peter Kilby; Gerson Graser
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 10.  Genetically engineered trees for plantation forests: key considerations for environmental risk assessment.

Authors:  Hely Häggman; Alan Raybould; Aluizio Borem; Thomas Fox; Levis Handley; Magnus Hertzberg; Meng-Zu Lu; Philip Macdonald; Taichi Oguchi; Giancarlo Pasquali; Les Pearson; Gary Peter; Hector Quemada; Armand Séguin; Kylie Tattersall; Eugênio Ulian; Christian Walter; Morven McLean
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 9.803

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.