Literature DB >> 27260270

Impact of peripheral hearing loss on top-down auditory processing.

Alexandria M H Lesicko1, Daniel A Llano2.   

Abstract

The auditory system consists of an intricate set of connections interposed between hierarchically arranged nuclei. The ascending pathways carrying sound information from the cochlea to the auditory cortex are, predictably, altered in instances of hearing loss resulting from blockage or damage to peripheral auditory structures. However, hearing loss-induced changes in descending connections that emanate from higher auditory centers and project back toward the periphery are still poorly understood. These pathways, which are the hypothesized substrate of high-level contextual and plasticity cues, are intimately linked to the ascending stream, and are thereby also likely to be influenced by auditory deprivation. In the current report, we review both the human and animal literature regarding changes in top-down modulation after peripheral hearing loss. Both aged humans and cochlear implant users are able to harness the power of top-down cues to disambiguate corrupted sounds and, in the case of aged listeners, may rely more heavily on these cues than non-aged listeners. The animal literature also reveals a plethora of structural and functional changes occurring in multiple descending projection systems after peripheral deafferentation. These data suggest that peripheral deafferentation induces a rebalancing of bottom-up and top-down controls, and that it will be necessary to understand the mechanisms underlying this rebalancing to develop better rehabilitation strategies for individuals with peripheral hearing loss.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27260270      PMCID: PMC5133198          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  80 in total

1.  Dynamic modification of cortical orientation tuning mediated by recurrent connections.

Authors:  Gidon Felsen; Yao-song Shen; Haishan Yao; Gareth Spor; Chaoyi Li; Yang Dan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations.

Authors:  J A Bashford; K R Riener; R M Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

Review 3.  Some effects of aging on central auditory processing.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Martin; James F Jerger
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

Review 4.  Speech comprehension training and auditory and cognitive processing in older adults.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Harry Levitt
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.493

Review 5.  Cochlear efferent innervation and function.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Phonemic restoration by hearing-impaired listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Deniz Başkent; Cheryl L Eiler; Brent Edwards
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Comparison of word-, sentence-, and phoneme-based training strategies in improving the perception of spectrally distorted speech.

Authors:  Paula C Stacey; A Quentin Summerfield
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Time course of efferent fiber and spiral ganglion cell degeneration following complete hair cell loss in the chinchilla.

Authors:  Sandra L McFadden; Dalian Ding; Haiyan Jiang; Richard J Salvi
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Retinal input regulates the timing of corticogeniculate innervation.

Authors:  Tania A Seabrook; Rana N El-Danaf; Thomas E Krahe; Michael A Fox; William Guido
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  The auditory corticocollicular system: molecular and circuit-level considerations.

Authors:  Kevin A Stebbings; Alexandria M H Lesicko; Daniel A Llano
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  7 in total

1.  Top-down or bottom up: decreased stimulus salience increases responses to predictable stimuli of auditory thalamic neurons.

Authors:  Srinivasa P Kommajosyula; Rui Cai; Edward Bartlett; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-04-21       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Responses to Predictable versus Random Temporally Complex Stimuli from Single Units in Auditory Thalamus: Impact of Aging and Anesthesia.

Authors:  Rui Cai; Ben D Richardson; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Associations of Hearing Sensitivity, Higher-Order Auditory Processing, and Cognition Over Time in Middle-Aged Adults.

Authors:  Natascha Merten; Mary E Fischer; Ted S Tweed; Monique M B Breteler; Karen J Cruickshanks
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 4.  Auditory thalamic circuits and GABAA receptor function: Putative mechanisms in tinnitus pathology.

Authors:  Donald M Caspary; Daniel A Llano
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Impact of ageing on postsynaptic neuronal nicotinic neurotransmission in auditory thalamus.

Authors:  Sarah Y Sottile; Lynne Ling; Brandon C Cox; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Sensory overamplification in layer 5 auditory corticofugal projection neurons following cochlear nerve synaptic damage.

Authors:  Meenakshi M Asokan; Ross S Williamson; Kenneth E Hancock; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Top-Down Inference in the Auditory System: Potential Roles for Corticofugal Projections.

Authors:  Alexander Asilador; Daniel A Llano
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.492

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.