Literature DB >> 19915031

Elimination of glycerol production in anaerobic cultures of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain engineered to use acetic acid as an electron acceptor.

Víctor Guadalupe Medina1, Marinka J H Almering, Antonius J A van Maris, Jack T Pronk.   

Abstract

In anaerobic cultures of wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae, glycerol production is essential to reoxidize NADH produced in biosynthetic processes. Consequently, glycerol is a major by-product during anaerobic production of ethanol by S. cerevisiae, the single largest fermentation process in industrial biotechnology. The present study investigates the possibility of completely eliminating glycerol production by engineering S. cerevisiae such that it can reoxidize NADH by the reduction of acetic acid to ethanol via NADH-dependent reactions. Acetic acid is available at significant amounts in lignocellulosic hydrolysates of agricultural residues. Consistent with earlier studies, deletion of the two genes encoding NAD-dependent glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPD1 and GPD2) led to elimination of glycerol production and an inability to grow anaerobically. However, when the E. coli mhpF gene, encoding the acetylating NAD-dependent acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (EC 1.2.1.10; acetaldehyde+NAD++coenzyme A<-->acetyl coenzyme A+NADH+H+), was expressed in the gpd1Delta gpd2Delta strain, anaerobic growth was restored by supplementation with 2.0 g liter(-1) acetic acid. The stoichiometry of acetate consumption and growth was consistent with the complete replacement of glycerol formation by acetate reduction to ethanol as the mechanism for NADH reoxidation. This study provides a proof of principle for the potential of this metabolic engineering strategy to improve ethanol yields, eliminate glycerol production, and partially convert acetate, which is a well-known inhibitor of yeast performance in lignocellulosic hydrolysates, to ethanol. Further research should address the kinetic aspects of acetate reduction and the effect of the elimination of glycerol production on cellular robustness (e.g., osmotolerance).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19915031      PMCID: PMC2798634          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01772-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  31 in total

Review 1.  Physiology of osmotolerance in fungi.

Authors:  A Blomberg; L Adler
Journal:  Adv Microb Physiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.517

2.  Effects of furfural on anaerobic continuous cultivation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  I S Horváth; M J Taherzadeh; C Niklasson; G Lidén
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2001-12-05       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Alcoholic fermentation of carbon sources in biomass hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: current status.

Authors:  Antonius J A van Maris; Derek A Abbott; Eleonora Bellissimi; Joost van den Brink; Marko Kuyper; Marijke A H Luttik; H Wouter Wisselink; W Alexander Scheffers; Johannes P van Dijken; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 2.271

4.  Engineering NADH metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: formate as an electron donor for glycerol production by anaerobic, glucose-limited chemostat cultures.

Authors:  Jan-Maarten A Geertman; Johannes P van Dijken; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 5.  Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains.

Authors:  Bärbel Hahn-Hägerdal; Kaisa Karhumaa; César Fonseca; Isabel Spencer-Martins; Marie F Gorwa-Grauslund
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Overproduction of acetyl-coenzyme A synthetase isoenzymes in respiring Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells does not reduce acetate production after exposure to glucose excess.

Authors:  P de Jong-Gubbels; M A van den Berg; M A Luttik; H Y Steensma; J P van Dijken; J T Pronk
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Energetic aspects of glucose metabolism in a pyruvate-dehydrogenase-negative mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  J T Pronk; T J Wenzel; M A Luttik; C C Klaassen; W A Scheffers; H Y Steensma; J P van Dijken
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 8.  Drug:H+ antiporters in chemical stress response in yeast.

Authors:  Isabel Sá-Correia; Sandra C dos Santos; Miguel C Teixeira; Tânia R Cabrito; Nuno P Mira
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 17.079

9.  Effects of acetic acid on the kinetics of xylose fermentation by an engineered, xylose-isomerase-based Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain.

Authors:  Eleonora Bellissimi; Johannes P van Dijken; Jack T Pronk; Antonius J A van Maris
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Catalase overexpression reduces lactic acid-induced oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Derek A Abbott; Erwin Suir; Giang-Huong Duong; Erik de Hulster; Jack T Pronk; Antonius J A van Maris
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  45 in total

1.  Gpd1 and Gpd2 fine-tuning for sustainable reduction of glycerol formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Georg Hubmann; Stephane Guillouet; Elke Nevoigt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a key cell factory platform for future biorefineries.

Authors:  Kuk-Ki Hong; Jens Nielsen
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Rewiring yeast metabolism to synthesize products beyond ethanol.

Authors:  Francesca V Gambacorta; Joshua J Dietrich; Qiang Yan; Brian F Pfleger
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Metabolic impact of increased NADH availability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jin Hou; Gionata Scalcinati; Marco Oldiges; Goutham N Vemuri
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Comparative genomics of xylose-fermenting fungi for enhanced biofuel production.

Authors:  Dana J Wohlbach; Alan Kuo; Trey K Sato; Katlyn M Potts; Asaf A Salamov; Kurt M Labutti; Hui Sun; Alicia Clum; Jasmyn L Pangilinan; Erika A Lindquist; Susan Lucas; Alla Lapidus; Mingjie Jin; Christa Gunawan; Venkatesh Balan; Bruce E Dale; Thomas W Jeffries; Robert Zinkel; Kerrie W Barry; Igor V Grigoriev; Audrey P Gasch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Increasing anaerobic acetate consumption and ethanol yields in Saccharomyces cerevisiae with NADPH-specific alcohol dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Brooks M Henningsen; Shuen Hon; Sean F Covalla; Carolina Sonu; D Aaron Argyros; Trisha F Barrett; Erin Wiswall; Allan C Froehlich; Rintze M Zelle
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  3' Truncation of the GPD1 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved ethanol yield and productivity.

Authors:  Wen-Tao Ding; Guo-Chang Zhang; Jing-Jing Liu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 8.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation ethanol production: from academic exploration to industrial implementation.

Authors:  Mickel L A Jansen; Jasmine M Bracher; Ioannis Papapetridis; Maarten D Verhoeven; Hans de Bruijn; Paul P de Waal; Antonius J A van Maris; Paul Klaassen; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Genome duplication and mutations in ACE2 cause multicellular, fast-sedimenting phenotypes in evolved Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Bart Oud; Victor Guadalupe-Medina; Jurgen F Nijkamp; Dick de Ridder; Jack T Pronk; Antonius J A van Maris; Jean-Marc Daran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Replacement of the initial steps of ethanol metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by ATP-independent acetylating acetaldehyde dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Barbara U Kozak; Harmen M van Rossum; Matthijs S Niemeijer; Marlous van Dijk; Kirsten Benjamin; Liang Wu; Jean-Marc G Daran; Jack T Pronk; Antonius J A van Maris
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.