Literature DB >> 26386051

Increasing anaerobic acetate consumption and ethanol yields in Saccharomyces cerevisiae with NADPH-specific alcohol dehydrogenase.

Brooks M Henningsen1, Shuen Hon1, Sean F Covalla1, Carolina Sonu1, D Aaron Argyros1, Trisha F Barrett1, Erin Wiswall1, Allan C Froehlich1, Rintze M Zelle2.   

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae has recently been engineered to use acetate, a primary inhibitor in lignocellulosic hydrolysates, as a cosubstrate during anaerobic ethanolic fermentation. However, the original metabolic pathway devised to convert acetate to ethanol uses NADH-specific acetylating acetaldehyde dehydrogenase and alcohol dehydrogenase and quickly becomes constrained by limited NADH availability, even when glycerol formation is abolished. We present alcohol dehydrogenase as a novel target for anaerobic redox engineering of S. cerevisiae. Introduction of an NADPH-specific alcohol dehydrogenase (NADPH-ADH) not only reduces the NADH demand of the acetate-to-ethanol pathway but also allows the cell to effectively exchange NADPH for NADH during sugar fermentation. Unlike NADH, NADPH can be freely generated under anoxic conditions, via the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway. We show that an industrial bioethanol strain engineered with the original pathway (expressing acetylating acetaldehyde dehydrogenase from Bifidobacterium adolescentis and with deletions of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase genes GPD1 and GPD2) consumed 1.9 g liter(-1) acetate during fermentation of 114 g liter(-1) glucose. Combined with a decrease in glycerol production from 4.0 to 0.1 g liter(-1), this increased the ethanol yield by 4% over that for the wild type. We provide evidence that acetate consumption in this strain is indeed limited by NADH availability. By introducing an NADPH-ADH from Entamoeba histolytica and with overexpression of ACS2 and ZWF1, we increased acetate consumption to 5.3 g liter(-1) and raised the ethanol yield to 7% above the wild-type level.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26386051      PMCID: PMC4651100          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01689-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  40 in total

1.  Importance of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in the adaptive response to hydrogen peroxide in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  S Izawa; K Maeda; T Miki; J Mano; Y Inoue; A Kimura
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Expression of different levels of enzymes from the Pichia stipitis XYL1 and XYL2 genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its effects on product formation during xylose utilisation.

Authors:  M Walfridsson; M Anderlund; X Bao; B Hahn-Hägerdal
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Expression of aldehyde dehydrogenase 6 reduces inhibitory effect of furan derivatives on cell growth and ethanol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Seong-Eon Park; Hyun Min Koo; Young Kyoung Park; Sung Min Park; Jae Chan Park; Oh-Kyu Lee; Yong-Cheol Park; Jin-Ho Seo
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 4.  The alcohol dehydrogenases of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Olga de Smidt; James C du Preez; Jacobus Albertyn
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Xylose isomerase overexpression along with engineering of the pentose phosphate pathway and evolutionary engineering enable rapid xylose utilization and ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Hang Zhou; Jing-Sheng Cheng; Benjamin L Wang; Gerald R Fink; Gregory Stephanopoulos
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 9.783

6.  Effects of acetic acid on the kinetics of xylose fermentation by an engineered, xylose-isomerase-based Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain.

Authors:  Eleonora Bellissimi; Johannes P van Dijken; Jack T Pronk; Antonius J A van Maris
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Optimal cofactor swapping can increase the theoretical yield for chemical production in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Zachary A King; Adam M Feist
Journal:  Metab Eng       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 9.783

Review 8.  Metabolism and regulation of glycerolipids in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Susan A Henry; Sepp D Kohlwein; George M Carman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The metabolic costs of improving ethanol yield by reducing glycerol formation capacity under anaerobic conditions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Julien Pagliardini; Georg Hubmann; Sandrine Alfenore; Elke Nevoigt; Carine Bideaux; Stephane E Guillouet
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 5.328

10.  Engineering of acetyl-CoA metabolism for the improved production of polyhydroxybutyrate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kanokarn Kocharin; Yun Chen; Verena Siewers; Jens Nielsen
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.298

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation ethanol production: from academic exploration to industrial implementation.

Authors:  Mickel L A Jansen; Jasmine M Bracher; Ioannis Papapetridis; Maarten D Verhoeven; Hans de Bruijn; Paul P de Waal; Antonius J A van Maris; Paul Klaassen; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Halomonas bluephagenesis Enhances Acetate Tolerance and Utilization to Produce Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate).

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Biao Jin; Jing Fu; Zhiwen Wang; Tao Chen
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Effect of nitrogen availability on the poly-3-D-hydroxybutyrate accumulation by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Diogo J Portugal-Nunes; Sudhanshu S Pawar; Gunnar Lidén; Marie F Gorwa-Grauslund
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.298

4.  Metabolic engineering strategies for optimizing acetate reduction, ethanol yield and osmotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ioannis Papapetridis; Marlous van Dijk; Antonius J A van Maris; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 6.040

5.  Cell wall O-acetyl and methyl esterification patterns of leaves reflected in atmospheric emission signatures of acetic acid and methanol.

Authors:  Rebecca A Dewhirst; Cassandra A Afseth; Cristina Castanha; Jenny C Mortimer; Kolby J Jardine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Systematic optimization of gene expression of pentose phosphate pathway enhances ethanol production from a glucose/xylose mixed medium in a recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Yosuke Kobayashi; Takehiko Sahara; Satoru Ohgiya; Yoichi Kamagata; Kazuhiro E Fujimori
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 3.298

7.  Case report and literature review of auto-brewery syndrome: probably an underdiagnosed medical condition.

Authors:  Fahad Malik; Prasanna Wickremesinghe; Jessie Saverimuttu
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-05

8.  Ethanol production from N-acetyl-D-glucosamine by Scheffersomyces stipitis strains.

Authors:  Kentaro Inokuma; Tomohisa Hasunuma; Akihiko Kondo
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.298

9.  Adaptation to low pH and lignocellulosic inhibitors resulting in ethanolic fermentation and growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Venkatachalam Narayanan; Violeta Sànchez I Nogué; Ed W J van Niel; Marie F Gorwa-Grauslund
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.298

10.  Improving ethanol yield in acetate-reducing Saccharomyces cerevisiae by cofactor engineering of 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase and deletion of ALD6.

Authors:  Ioannis Papapetridis; Marlous van Dijk; Arthur P A Dobbe; Benjamin Metz; Jack T Pronk; Antonius J A van Maris
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 5.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.