Literature DB >> 19901847

Noninvasive assessment of central and peripheral arterial pressure (waveforms): implications of calibration methods.

Dries Mahieu1, Jan Kips, Ernst R Rietzschel, Marc L De Buyzere, Francis Verbeke, Thierry C Gillebert, Guy G De Backer, Dirk De Bacquer, Pascal Verdonck, Luc M Van Bortel, Patrick Segers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure (BP) from radial artery pressure waveforms is increasingly applied. We investigated the impact of radial artery waveform calibration on central BP assessment and calculated pressure amplification, with focus on the one-third rule used to estimate mean arterial BP (MAP).
METHODS: Pressure waveforms were noninvasively measured at the radial and carotid arteries in 1873 individuals (age 45.8+/-6.1 years). Radial and carotid artery waveforms were calibrated using brachial artery DBP and SBP, MAP estimated with the one-third rule and MAP estimated as brachial DBP along with 40% of brachial artery pulse pressure.
RESULTS: Central SBP obtained via a transfer function was 123.5 +/- 15.7, 117.8 +/- 14.2 and 126.0 +/- 15.4 mmHg (mean +/- SD) following above-mentioned three calibration schemes, respectively. Using the same calibration schemes, carotid artery SBP was 131.4 +/- 15.2, 118.4 +/- 14.4 and 126.8 +/- 15.7 mmHg, respectively. Central-to-brachial amplification was 13.0 +/- 3.6 mmHg using second method as compared with 4.6 +/- 3.8 mmHg with third method. Brachial-to-radial amplification was actually negative (-6.3 +/- 4.5 mmHg) using second method, whereas 3.4 +/- 5.5 mmHg was found with third method.
CONCLUSION: Both carotid artery SBP and central SBP obtained via a transfer function are highly sensitive to the calibration of the respective carotid artery and radial artery pressure waveforms. Our data suggest that the one-third rule to calculate MAP from brachial cuff BP should be avoided, especially when used to calibrate radial artery pressure waveforms for subsequent application of a pressure transfer function. Until more precise estimation methods become available, it is advisable to use 40% of brachial pulse pressure instead of 33% to assess MAP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19901847     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283340a1a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  13 in total

Review 1.  Arterial stiffness: basic concepts and measurement techniques.

Authors:  Julio A Chirinos
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Different effects of tocolytic medication on blood pressure and blood pressure amplification.

Authors:  Isabelle Fabry; Peter De Paepe; Jan Kips; Sebastian Vermeersch; Luc Van Bortel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Distal shift of arterial pressure wave reflection sites with aging.

Authors:  Jun Sugawara; Koichiro Hayashi; Hirofumi Tanaka
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Considerations for SphygmoCor radial artery pulse wave analysis: side selection and peripheral arterial blood pressure calibration.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Martin; Alexandra R Borges; John B Christy; Darren T Beck
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.872

5.  A region-matching method for pulse transit time estimation: potential for improving the accuracy in determining carotid femoral pulse wave velocity.

Authors:  F S Hu; Y L Zhang; Z C Ma; Q Q Cao; Y B Xu; Z J He; Y N Sun
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.012

6.  Differential vascular reactivity responses acutely following ingestion of a nitrate rich red spinach extract.

Authors:  Cody T Haun; Wesley C Kephart; Angelia M Holland; Christopher B Mobley; Anna E McCloskey; Joshua J Shake; David D Pascoe; Michael D Roberts; Jeffrey S Martin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Impact of hypertension on ventricular-arterial coupling and regional myocardial work at rest and during isometric exercise.

Authors:  Tatiana Kuznetsova; Jan D'hooge; Malgorzata Kloch-Badelek; Wojciech Sakiewicz; Lutgarde Thijs; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 8.  Central blood pressure: current evidence and clinical importance.

Authors:  Carmel M McEniery; John R Cockcroft; Mary J Roman; Stanley S Franklin; Ian B Wilkinson
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 9.  Central Hemodynamics for Management of Arteriosclerotic Diseases.

Authors:  Junichiro Hashimoto
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 4.928

10.  Arterial pressure: agreement between a brachial cuff-based device and radial tonometry.

Authors:  Chloe M Park; Olga Korolkova; Justin E Davies; Kim H Parker; Jennifer H Siggers; Katherine March; Therese Tillin; Nish Chaturvedi; Alun D Hughes
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.