Literature DB >> 24459197

Central blood pressure: current evidence and clinical importance.

Carmel M McEniery1, John R Cockcroft2, Mary J Roman3, Stanley S Franklin4, Ian B Wilkinson5.   

Abstract

Pressure measured with a cuff and sphygmomanometer in the brachial artery is accepted as an important predictor of future cardiovascular risk. However, systolic pressure varies throughout the arterial tree, such that aortic (central) systolic pressure is actually lower than corresponding brachial values, although this difference is highly variable between individuals. Emerging evidence now suggests that central pressure is better related to future cardiovascular events than is brachial pressure. Moreover, anti-hypertensive drugs can exert differential effects on brachial and central pressure. Therefore, basing treatment decisions on central, rather than brachial pressure, is likely to have important implications for the future diagnosis and management of hypertension. Such a paradigm shift will, however, require further, direct evidence that selectively targeting central pressure, brings added benefit, over and above that already provided by brachial artery pressure. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-hypertensive treatment; Blood pressure; Cardiovascular risk; Central pressure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24459197      PMCID: PMC4155427          DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  103 in total

1.  Favourable effects on arterial wave reflection and pulse pressure amplification of adding angiotensin II receptor blockade in resistant hypertension.

Authors:  A Mahmud; J Feely
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Antihypertensive effects and arterial haemodynamic alterations during angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition.

Authors:  G M London; B Pannier; E Vicaut; A P Guérin; S J Marchais; M E Safar; J L Cuche
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.844

3.  Central pulse pressure and mortality in end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Michel E Safar; Jacques Blacher; Bruno Pannier; Alain P Guerin; Sylvain J Marchais; Pierre-Marie Guyonvarc'h; Gérard M London
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Antihypertensive effect of sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate for isolated systolic systemic hypertension in the elderly.

Authors:  J Duchier; F Iannascoli; M Safar
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-07-01       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the Strong Heart Study.

Authors:  Mary J Roman; Richard B Devereux; Jorge R Kizer; Elisa T Lee; James M Galloway; Tauqeer Ali; Jason G Umans; Barbara V Howard
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Differences in the magnitude of wave reflection account for differential effects of amlodipine- versus atenolol-based regimens on central blood pressure: an Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcome Trial substudy.

Authors:  Charlotte H Manisty; Andrew Zambanini; Kim H Parker; Justin E Davies; Darrel P Francis; Jamil Mayet; Simon A McG Thom; Alun D Hughes
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Once daily therapy with isosorbide-5-mononitrate causes endothelial dysfunction in humans: evidence of a free-radical-mediated mechanism.

Authors:  George R Thomas; Jonathan M DiFabio; Tommaso Gori; John D Parker
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Quantification of glyceryl trinitrate effect through analysis of the synthesised ascending aortic pressure waveform.

Authors:  X J Jiang; M F O'Rourke; W Q L Jin; L S Liu; C W Li; P C Tai; X C Zhang; S Z Liu
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  2007 ESH-ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Giuseppe Mansia; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Renata Cifkova; Robert Fagard; Giuseppe Germano; Guido Grassi; Anthony M Heagerty; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stephane Laurent; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Luis Ruilope; Andrzej Rynkiewicz; Roland E Schmieder; Harry A Struijker Boudier; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  A comparison of atenolol and nebivolol in isolated systolic hypertension.

Authors:  Zahid Dhakam; Carmel M McEniery; Tim Burton; Morris J Brown; Ian B Wilkinson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.844

View more
  163 in total

1.  Effect of Amlodipine/Valsartan Versus Nebivolol/Valsartan Fixed Dose Combinations on Peripheral and Central Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Selvia M Farag; Hoda M Rabea; Hesham B Mahmoud
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2018-11-03

2.  Racial Differences in Associations of Blood Pressure Components in Young Adulthood With Incident Cardiovascular Disease by Middle Age: Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.

Authors:  Yuichiro Yano; Jared P Reis; Yacob G Tedla; David C Goff; David R Jacobs; Stephen Sidney; Hongyan Ning; Kiang Liu; Philip Greenland; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  Aortic augmentation index in endurance athletes: a role for cardiorespiratory fitness.

Authors:  Joshua Denham; Nicholas J Brown; Maciej Tomaszewski; Bryan Williams; Brendan J O'Brien; Fadi J Charchar
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Does Measurement of Central Blood Pressure have Treatment Consequences in the Clinical Praxis?

Authors:  Gary F Mitchell
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  The impact of upper-limb position on estimated central blood pressure waveforms.

Authors:  Lee Stoner; Keeron Stone; Gabriel Zieff; EriK D Hanson; Daniel Credeur; James Faulkner; Anna Kucharska-Newton; Simon Fryer
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.012

6.  Associations of central and brachial blood pressure with cognitive function: a population-based study.

Authors:  E D Nilsson; S Elmståhl; L Minthon; P M Nilsson; M Pihlsgård; K Nägga
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 7.  Pulse Waveform Analysis: Is It Ready for Prime Time?

Authors:  Bernhard Hametner; Siegfried Wassertheurer
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 8.  Noninvasive Imaging of Flow and Vascular Function in Disease of the Aorta.

Authors:  Matthew C Whitlock; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09

9.  Association of left ventricular structural and functional abnormalities with aortic and brachial blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients: the SAFAR study.

Authors:  C Chi; S-K Yu; R Auckle; A A Argyris; E Nasothimiou; C Tountas; E Aissopou; J Blacher; M E Safar; P P Sfikakis; Y Zhang; A D Protogerou
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.012

10.  Relationship between sleep-disordered breathing and central systolic blood pressure in a community-based population: the Toon Health Study.

Authors:  Kenta Igami; Koutatsu Maruyama; Kiyohide Tomooka; Ai Ikeda; Yasuharu Tabara; Katsuhiko Kohara; Isao Saito; Takeshi Tanigawa
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.