BACKGROUND: To understand better the mechanism of left ventricular (LV) remodeling related to hypertension, it is important to evaluate LV function in relation to the changes in loading conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate changes in conventional ventricular-arterial coupling indexes, LV strain, and a new index reflecting regional myocardial work assessed noninvasively at rest and during isometric exercise in a random sample including participants with normal blood pressure and those with hypertension. METHODS: A total of 148 participants (53.4% women; mean age, 52.0 years; 39.2% with hypertension) underwent simultaneous echocardiographic and arterial data acquisition at rest and during increased afterload (handgrip exercise). End-systolic pressure was determined from the carotid pulse wave. Arterial elastance (Ea) and LV elastance (Ees) were calculated as end-systolic pressure/stroke volume and end-systolic pressure/end-systolic volume. Doppler tissue imaging and two-dimensional speckle tracking were used to derive LV longitudinal strain. Regional myocardial work (ejection work density [EWD]) was the area of the pressure-strain loop during ejection. RESULTS: At rest, with adjustments applied, Ees (3.06 vs 3.71 mm Hg/mL, P = .0003), Ea/Ees (0.54 vs 0.47, P = .002) and EWD (670 vs 802 Pa/m(2), P = .0001) differed significantly between participants with normal blood pressure and those with hypertension. During handgrip exercise, Ea and Ea/Ees significantly increased (P < .0001) in both groups. Doppler tissue imaging and two-dimensional LV strain decreased in participants with hypertension (P ≤ .008). Only in subjects with normal blood pressure EWD significantly increased (+14.7%, P = .0009). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with hypertension compared with those with normal blood pressure have increased LV systolic stiffness and regional myocardial work to match arterial load at rest, they might have diminished cardiac reserve to increase myocardial performance, as estimated by EWD during isometric exercise.
BACKGROUND: To understand better the mechanism of left ventricular (LV) remodeling related to hypertension, it is important to evaluate LV function in relation to the changes in loading conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate changes in conventional ventricular-arterial coupling indexes, LV strain, and a new index reflecting regional myocardial work assessed noninvasively at rest and during isometric exercise in a random sample including participants with normal blood pressure and those with hypertension. METHODS: A total of 148 participants (53.4% women; mean age, 52.0 years; 39.2% with hypertension) underwent simultaneous echocardiographic and arterial data acquisition at rest and during increased afterload (handgrip exercise). End-systolic pressure was determined from the carotid pulse wave. Arterial elastance (Ea) and LV elastance (Ees) were calculated as end-systolic pressure/stroke volume and end-systolic pressure/end-systolic volume. Doppler tissue imaging and two-dimensional speckle tracking were used to derive LV longitudinal strain. Regional myocardial work (ejection work density [EWD]) was the area of the pressure-strain loop during ejection. RESULTS: At rest, with adjustments applied, Ees (3.06 vs 3.71 mm Hg/mL, P = .0003), Ea/Ees (0.54 vs 0.47, P = .002) and EWD (670 vs 802 Pa/m(2), P = .0001) differed significantly between participants with normal blood pressure and those with hypertension. During handgrip exercise, Ea and Ea/Ees significantly increased (P < .0001) in both groups. Doppler tissue imaging and two-dimensional LV strain decreased in participants with hypertension (P ≤ .008). Only in subjects with normal blood pressure EWD significantly increased (+14.7%, P = .0009). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with hypertension compared with those with normal blood pressure have increased LV systolic stiffness and regional myocardial work to match arterial load at rest, they might have diminished cardiac reserve to increase myocardial performance, as estimated by EWD during isometric exercise.
Authors: J D'hooge; A Heimdal; F Jamal; T Kukulski; B Bijnens; F Rademakers; L Hatle; P Suetens; G R Sutherland Journal: Eur J Echocardiogr Date: 2000-09
Authors: Martin Osranek; John H Eisenach; Bijoy K Khandheria; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; James B Seward; Marek Belohlavek Journal: Hypertension Date: 2007-12-24 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Barry A Borlaug; Carolyn S P Lam; Véronique L Roger; Richard J Rodeheffer; Margaret M Redfield Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Peter Wohlfahrt; Margaret M Redfield; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Vojtech Melenovsky; Garvan C Kane; Richard J Rodeheffer; Barry A Borlaug Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: Bálint Károly Lakatos; Mihály Ruppert; Márton Tokodi; Attila Oláh; Szilveszter Braun; Christian Karime; Zsuzsanna Ladányi; Alex Ali Sayour; Bálint András Barta; Béla Merkely; Tamás Radovits; Attila Kovács Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2021-03-23
Authors: Vernon Bond; Bryan H Curry; Richard G Adams; Thomas Obisesan; Sudhakar Pemminati; Vasavi R Gorantla; Kishan Kadur; Richard M Millis Journal: N Am J Med Sci Date: 2016-06