Literature DB >> 18407509

Outcome after esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and GEJ in patients aged over 75 years.

Eveline Internullo1, Johnny Moons, Philippe Nafteux, Willy Coosemans, Georges Decker, Paul De Leyn, Dirk Van Raemdonck, Toni Lerut.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Though the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer is increasingly accepted for elderly people defined as aged over 70 years, less is reported about the results in patients over 75. This study is a single institution retrospective analysis of outcome after esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and GEJ in patients aged over 75 years.
METHODS: All consecutive patients 76 years old and over undergoing curative esophagectomy for cancer in the period 1991-2006 were analyzed as to comorbidities, outcome and long-term survival. All the data had been prospectively collected in a database. Postoperative mortality risk was assessed by P-POSSUM and O-POSSUM score for in-hospital mortality and by the recently published Steyerberg's score system [Steyerberg EW, Neville BA, Koppert LB, Lemmens VEPP, Tilanus HW, Coebergh JWW, Weeks JC, Earle CC. Surgical mortality in patients with esophageal cancer: development and validation of a simple risk score. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4277-84.] for 30-day mortality. Five-year survival was compared to the standardized survival in the general population.
RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients fulfilling the abovementioned criteria were found (76 males and 32 females, mean age 79.5 years, mean standardized life-expectancy: 7.36 years). Among them, 69% had esophageal tumors and 31% GEJ tumors. The predominant histology was adenocarcinoma (74%). Eighty-six (79.6%) presented with one or more major comorbidities or a history of previous major upper-GI surgery, potentially affecting the surgical outcome. All underwent resection with curative intent (R(0) 83.3%, R(1) 12%, R(2) 4.6%). The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 51.9%, pulmonary complications (37%) being the most frequent. Postoperative mortality, mainly due to cardiopulmonary complications, was 7.4%, which was consistent with that predicted by P-POSSUM score (7.2%) and lower than that predicted by O-POSSUM score (15.1%). Thirty-day mortality was 5.5%, being consistent with that predicted by the Steyerberg's score (6.8%). Overall 5-year survival was 35.7%, while R(0) overall survival 42% and cancer specific R(0) survival 51.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients 76 years old and over with esophageal or GEJ cancer should not be denied surgery solely on the basis of age. Outcome and long-term results in the selected elderly are not differing from those reported for younger patients. However, despite thorough preoperative assessment being applied in the selection of the candidates for surgery, a practical and reliable individual risk-analysis stratification is still lacking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18407509     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  30 in total

1.  New serum biomarkers for detection of esophageal carcinoma using Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Renyong Guo; Chunqin Pan; Jianmin Shen; Chibo Liu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Patient Selection for Oesophagectomy: Impact of Age and Comorbidities on Outcome.

Authors:  Gregory O'Grady; Ahmer M Hameed; Tony C Pang; Emma Johnston; Vincent T Lam; Arthur J Richardson; Michael J Hollands
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Individual risk modelling for esophagectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  John M Findlay; Richard S Gillies; Bruno Sgromo; Robert E K Marshall; Mark R Middleton; Nicholas D Maynard
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Improved long-term survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: influence of epidemiologic shift and neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Frank Makowiec; Peter Baier; Birte Kulemann; Goran Marjanovic; Peter Bronsert; Katja Zirlik; Michael Henke; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; Jens Hoeppner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Evaluation of O-POSSUM vs ASA and APACHE II scores in patients undergoing oesophageal surgery.

Authors:  Raluca Fodor; Adrian Cioc; Bianca Grigorescu; Bogdan Lăzescu; Sanda Maria Copotoiu
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2015-04

6.  An alternative postoperative pathway reduces length of hospitalisation following oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Sandra C Tomaszek; Stephen D Cassivi; Mark S Allen; K Robert Shen; Francis C Nichols; Claude Deschamps; Dennis A Wigle
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  The effect of age on the outcome of esophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Abbas Alibakhshi; Ali Aminian; Rasoul Mirsharifi; Yosra Jahangiri; Habibollah Dashti; Faramarz Karimian
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.219

8.  Extended esophagectomy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer: minor effect of age alone in determining the postoperative course and survival.

Authors:  B B Pultrum; D J Bosch; M W N Nijsten; M G G Rodgers; H Groen; J P J Slaets; J Th M Plukker
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Decreased core muscle size is associated with worse patient survival following esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  K H Sheetz; L Zhao; S A Holcombe; S C Wang; R M Reddy; J Lin; M B Orringer; A C Chang
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.429

10.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the elderly.

Authors:  Shailesh Puntambekar; Rahul Kenawadekar; Archit Pandit; Akshay Nadkarni; Saurabh Joshi; Geetanjali Agarwal; Nasir Ahmad Bhat; Jainul Malik; Sunil Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-08-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.