Literature DB >> 18844909

Diagnostic value of routine aqueous contrast swallow examination after oesophagectomy for detecting leakage of the cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis.

Judith Boone1, Inne Borel Rinkes, Maarten van Leeuwen, Richard van Hillegersberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Water-soluble contrast swallow examination is routinely carried out after oesophagectomy to detect leakage of the cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and clinical value.
METHODS: Patients with oesophageal carcinoma who underwent oesophagectomy with gastric conduit formation and a hand-sewn cervical anastomosis between 1989 and 2003 were reviewed on outcome of routine aqueous contrast swallow examination (RACSE) and appearance of clinical anastomotic leakage.
RESULTS: An RACSE was carried out in 207 (82%) of 252 patients on postoperative day 8 (range 3-15). In 45 patients, no RACSE was executed, mainly because of a prolonged stay in intensive care unit. In 18 (9%) of 207 cases, the RACSE could not be interpreted by the radiologist. In 19 (53%) of 36 patients who developed a clinical leakage, the leak had already manifested clinically before the routine contrast examination was planned. Taken together, the false-positive rate was 8%, the false-negative rate 48%, sensitivity 52%, specificity 92%, positive predictive value 46% and negative predictive value 93%. No significant differences were found between the accuracy of RACSE in end-to-end or end-to-side cervical anastomoses.
CONCLUSION: Given the very low sensitivity and low positive predictive value and given the fact that in 53% of patients with a clinical leak, the leakage had appeared clinically before the contrast swallow examination was routinely planned, we propose to abandon the routine contrast swallow examination after oesophagectomy to detect cervical anastomotic leakage. Alternatively, anastomotic integrity can be tested by drinking small amounts of water with simultaneous observation of the cervical wound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18844909     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04650.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  19 in total

1.  Routine Contrast Esophagram in Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy; Methodological Issues on Diagnostic Value: Reply.

Authors:  Zhengbin You
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Calcification of arteries supplying the gastric tube increases the risk of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Gefei Zhao; Jiagen Li; Bin Qu; Susheng Shi; Xiaoli Feng; Hao Feng; Jun Jiang; Qi Xue; Jie He
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Reduction in length of stay for patients undergoing oesophageal and gastric resections with implementation of enhanced recovery packages.

Authors:  J Tang; D J Humes; E Gemmil; N T Welch; S L Parsons; J A Catton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  The Diagnostic Value of Routine Contrast Esophagram in Anastomotic Leaks After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Zhongwu Hu; Xiaowe Wang; Xush An; Wenjin Li; Yun Feng; Zhenbing You
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Contrast-Enhanced Radiologic Evaluation of Gastric Conduit Emptying After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Minke L Feenstra; Lily Alkemade; Janneke E van den Bergh; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Freek Daams; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Wietse J Eshuis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.339

6.  An alternative postoperative pathway reduces length of hospitalisation following oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Sandra C Tomaszek; Stephen D Cassivi; Mark S Allen; K Robert Shen; Francis C Nichols; Claude Deschamps; Dennis A Wigle
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Drain amylase aids detection of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Erin H Baker; Joshua S Hill; Mark K Reames; James Symanowski; Susie C Hurley; Jonathan C Salo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-04

8.  Oncologic Long-Term Results of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Thoraco-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy with Two-Field Lymphadenectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  P C van der Sluis; J P Ruurda; R J J Verhage; S van der Horst; L Haverkamp; P D Siersema; I H M Borel Rinkes; F J W Ten Kate; R van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  Systematic review of enhanced recovery after gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  E H Gemmill; D J Humes; J A Catton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Role of Barium Swallow in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Anastomotic Leak following Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Simon Roh; Mark D Iannettoni; John C Keech; Mohammad Bashir; Peter J Gruber; Kalpaj R Parekh
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-04-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.