Literature DB >> 3411022

The contribution of the near and far ear toward localization of sound in the sagittal plane.

R A Humanski1, R A Butler.   

Abstract

Eight listeners were required to locate a train of 4.5-kHz high-pass noise bursts emanating from loudspeakers positioned +/- 30, +/- 20, +/- 10, and 0 deg re: interaural axis. The vertical array of loudspeakers was placed at 45, 90, and 135 deg left of midline. The various experimental conditions incorporated binaural and monaural listening with the latter utilizing the ear nearest or ear farthest from the sound source. While performance excelled when listening with only the near ear, the contribution of the far ear was statistically significant when compared to localization performance when both ears were occluded. Based on head related transfer functions for stimuli whose bandwidth was 1.0 kHz, four spectral cues were selected as candidates for influencing location judgments. Two of them associated relative changes in energy across center frequencies (CFs) with vertical source positions. The other two associated an absolute minimum (maximum) energy for specific CFs with a vertical source position. All but one cue when measured for the near ear could account for localization proficiency. On the other hand, when listening with the far ear, maximum energy at a specific CF outperformed the remaining cues in accounting for localization proficiency.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3411022     DOI: 10.1121/1.396361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  The linkage between stimulus frequency and covert peak areas as it relates to monaural localization.

Authors:  M E Rogers; R A Butler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-11

2.  Blind subjects process auditory spectral cues more efficiently than sighted individuals.

Authors:  M-E Doucet; J-P Guillemot; M Lassonde; J-P Gagné; C Leclerc; F Lepore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Localization of sound in the vertical plane with and without high-frequency spectral cues.

Authors:  R A Butler; R A Humanski
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-02

4.  Relearning sound localization with a new ear.

Authors:  Marc M Van Wanrooij; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Activity of neurons in the mouse inferior colliculus in relation to the position and direction of displacement of spectral contrast.

Authors:  E S Malinina; I A Vartanyan
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-11

6.  On the ability of human listeners to distinguish between front and back.

Authors:  Peter Xinya Zhang; William M Hartmann
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Role of auditory cortex in sound localization in the midsagittal plane.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Fernando R Nodal; Carl H Parsons; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Acoustic cues for sound source distance and azimuth in rabbits, a racquetball and a rigid spherical model.

Authors:  Duck O Kim; Brian Bishop; Shigeyuki Kuwada
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-05

9.  Effects of Head Movements on Sound-Source Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Patients With Their Cochlear Implant On Versus Off.

Authors:  M Torben Pastore; Sarah J Natale; Colton Clayton; Michael F Dorman; William A Yost; Yi Zhou
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Listening Difficulties in Children With Normal Audiograms: Relation to Hearing and Cognition.

Authors:  Lauren Petley; Lisa L Hunter; Lina Motlagh Zadeh; Hannah J Stewart; Nicholette T Sloat; Audrey Perdew; Li Lin; David R Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.