Literature DB >> 12398464

Contribution of spectral cues to human sound localization.

Erno H A Langendijk1, Adelbert W Bronkhorst.   

Abstract

The contribution of spectral cues to human sound localization was investigated by removing cues in 1/2-, 1- or 2-octave bands in the frequency range above 4 kHz. Localization responses were given by placing an acoustic pointer at the same apparent position as a virtual target. The pointer was generated by filtering a 100-ms harmonic complex with equalized head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). Listeners controlled the pointer via a hand-held stick that rotated about a fixed point. In the baseline condition, the target, a 200-ms noise burst, was filtered with the same HRTFs as the pointer. In other conditions, the spectral information within a certain frequency band was removed by replacing the directional transfer function within this band with the average transfer of this band. Analysis of the data showed that removing cues in 1/2-octave bands did not affect localization, whereas for the 2-octave band correct localization was virtually impossible. The results obtained for the 1-octave bands indicate that up-down cues are located mainly in the 6-12-kHz band, and front-back cues in the 8-16-kHz band. The interindividual spread in response patterns suggests that different listeners use different localization cues. The response patterns in the median plane can be predicted using a model based on spectral comparison of directional transfer functions for target and response directions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12398464     DOI: 10.1121/1.1501901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Influence of static eye and head position on tone-evoked gaze shifts.

Authors:  Tom J Van Grootel; Marc M Van Wanrooij; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts.

Authors:  Kachina Allen; David Alais; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Misperception of exocentric directions in auditory space.

Authors:  Joeanna C Arthur; John W Philbeck; Jesse Sargent; Stephen Dopkins
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-06-13

4.  Influence of aging on human sound localization.

Authors:  Marina S Dobreva; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Internalized elevation perception of simple stimuli in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Tanvi Thakkar; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Two-dimensional localization of virtual sound sources in cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Piotr Majdak; Matthew J Goupell; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The Encoding of Sound Source Elevation in the Human Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Régis Trapeau; Marc Schönwiesner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Vertical-plane sound localization with distorted spectral cues.

Authors:  Ewan A Macpherson; Andrew T Sabin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  On the ability of human listeners to distinguish between front and back.

Authors:  Peter Xinya Zhang; William M Hartmann
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Improvements of sound localization abilities by the facial ruff of the barn owl (Tyto alba) as demonstrated by virtual ruff removal.

Authors:  Laura Hausmann; Mark von Campenhausen; Frank Endler; Martin Singheiser; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.