Literature DB >> 27904958

Feasibility of an implanted microphone for cochlear implant listening.

Jean-Marc Gérard1,2, Laurent Demanez3, Caroline Salmon3, Filiep Vanpoucke4, Joris Walraevens4, Anke Plasmans4, Daniele De Siati5, Philippe Lefèbvre3.   

Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating the feasibility of an implanted microphone for cochlear implants (CI) by comparison of hearing outcomes, sound quality and patient satisfaction of a subcutaneous microphone to a standard external microphone of a behind-the-ear sound processor. In this prospective feasibility study with a within-subject repeated measures design comparing the microphone modalities, ten experienced adult unilateral CI users received an implantable contralateral subcutaneous microphone attached to a percutaneous plug. The signal was pre-processed and fed into their CI sound processor. Subjects compared listening modes at home for a period of up to 4 months. At the end of the study the microphone was explanted. Aided audiometric thresholds, speech understanding in quiet, and sound quality questionnaires were assessed. On average thresholds (250, 500, 750, 1k, 2k, 3k, 4k and 6 kHz) with the subcutaneous microphone were 44.9 dB, compared to 36.4 dB for the external mode. Speech understanding on sentences in quiet was high, within approximately 90% of performance levels compared to hearing with an external microphone. Body sounds were audible but not annoying to almost all subjects. This feasibility study with a research device shows significantly better results than previous studies with implanted microphones. This is attributed to technology enhancements and careful fitting. Listening effort was somewhat increased with an implanted microphone. Under good sound conditions, speech performance is nearly similar to that of external microphones demonstrating that an implanted microphone is feasible in a range of normal listening conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; Implantable microphone; Speech performance; Subcutaneous microphone; Totally implantable hearing device

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27904958     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4410-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  9 in total

1.  Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.

Authors:  Jinqiu Sang; Hongmei Hu; Chengshi Zheng; Guoping Li; Mark E Lutman; Stefan Bleeck
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Focused intracochlear electric stimulation with phased array channels.

Authors:  Chris van den Honert; David C Kelsall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cochlear implant optimized noise reduction.

Authors:  Stefan J Mauger; Komal Arora; Pam W Dawson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 4.  Otologics active middle ear implants.

Authors:  Herman A Jenkins; Kristin Uhler
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Speech perception comparisons using an implanted and an external microphone in existing cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Herman A Jenkins; Kristin Uhler
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Initial clinical experience with a totally implantable cochlear implant research device.

Authors:  Robert J S Briggs; Helmut C Eder; Peter M Seligman; Robert S C Cowan; Kerrie L Plant; James Dalton; David K Money; James F Patrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  European results with totally implantable carina placed on the round window: 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Christian Martin; Arnaud Deveze; Céline Richard; Philippe P Lefebvre; Monique Decat; Luis Garcia Ibañez; Eric Truy; Thierry Mom; Jean-Pierre Lavieille; Jacques Magnan; Christian Dubreuil; Stéphane Tringali
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Setting and reaching targets with computer-assisted cochlear implant fitting.

Authors:  Bart Vaerenberg; Geert De Ceulaer; Zoltán Szlávik; Patrizia Mancini; Andreas Buechner; Paul J Govaerts
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-03-16

9.  Carina® and Esteem®: a systematic review of fully implantable hearing devices.

Authors:  Janaina Oliveira Bentivi Pulcherio; Aline Gomes Bittencourt; Patrick Rademaker Burke; Rafael da Costa Monsanto; Rubens de Brito; Robinson Koji Tsuji; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.