Literature DB >> 26673987

CHANGES IN PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT STRESS DURING RUNNING WITH THE APPLICATION OF A PREFABRICATED FOOT ORTHOTIC.

Thomas G Almonroeder1, Lauren C Benson1, Kristian M O'Connor1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Foot orthotics are commonly utilized in the treatment of patellofemoral pain (PFP) and have shown clinical benefit; however, their mechanism of action remains unclear. Patellofemoral joint stress (PFJS) is thought to be one of the main etiological factors associated with PFP. HYPOTHESIS/
PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a prefabricated foot orthotic with 5 ° of medial rearfoot wedging on the magnitude and the timing of the peak PFJS in a group of healthy female recreational athletes. The hypothesis was that there would be significant reduction in the peak patellofemoral joint stress and a delay in the timing of this peak in the orthotic condition. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional.
METHODS: Kinematic and kinetic data were collected during running trials in a group of healthy, female recreational athletes. The knee angle and moment data in the sagittal plane were incorporated into a previously developed model to estimate patellofemoral joint stress. The dependent variables of interest were the peak patellofemoral joint stress as well as the percentage of stance at which this peak occurred, as both the magnitude and the timing of the joint loading are thought to be important in overuse running injuries.
RESULTS: The peak patellofemoral joint stress significantly increased in the orthotic condition by 5.8% (p=.02, ES=0.24), which does not support the initial hypothesis. However, the orthotic did significantly delay the timing of the peak during the stance phase by 3.8% (p=.002, ES=0.47).
CONCLUSIONS: The finding that the peak patellofemoral joint stress increased in the orthotic condition did not support the initial hypothesis. However, the finding that the timing of this peak was delayed to later in the stance phase in the orthotic condition did support the initial hypothesis and may be related to the clinical improvements previously reported in subjects with PFP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; knee; patellofemoral pain

Year:  2015        PMID: 26673987      PMCID: PMC4675197     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  44 in total

1.  The effects of tibial rotation on the patellofemoral joint: assessment of the changes in in situ strain in the peripatellar retinaculum and the patellofemoral contact pressures and areas.

Authors:  T Q Lee; B Y Yang; M D Sandusky; P J McMahon
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

2.  Patellofemoral joint kinetics while squatting with and without an external load.

Authors:  David A Wallace; George J Salem; Ruben Salinas; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Short- and long-term influences of a custom foot orthotic intervention on lower extremity dynamics.

Authors:  Christopher L MacLean; Irene S Davis; Joseph Hamill
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.638

4.  Effects of a movement training program on hip and knee joint frontal plane running mechanics.

Authors:  Isaac Wouters; Thomas Almonroeder; Bryan Dejarlais; Andrew Laack; John D Willson; Thomas W Kernozek
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-12

5.  Effects of medially wedged foot orthoses on knee and hip joint running mechanics in females with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome.

Authors:  Andrew R Boldt; John D Willson; Joaquin A Barrios; Thomas W Kernozek
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 1.833

6.  A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries.

Authors:  J E Taunton; M B Ryan; D B Clement; D C McKenzie; D R Lloyd-Smith; B D Zumbo
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Utility of the frontal plane projection angle in females with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  John D Willson; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  The influence of fixed rotational deformities of the femur on the patellofemoral contact pressures in human cadaver knees.

Authors:  T Q Lee; S H Anzel; K A Bennett; D Pang; W C Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Predictors of hip internal rotation during running: an evaluation of hip strength and femoral structure in women with and without patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Richard B Souza; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  1 in total

1.  Lower Extremity Biomechanics During a Drop-Vertical Jump and Muscle Strength in Women With Patellofemoral Pain.

Authors:  Andrea Baellow; Neal R Glaviano; Jay Hertel; Susan A Saliba
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.860

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.