Literature DB >> 19885238

Using support vector machines to detect therapeutically incorrect measurements by the MiniMed CGMS.

Jorge Bondia1, Cristina Tarín, Winston García-Gabin, Eduardo Esteve, José Manuel Fernández-Real, Wifredo Ricart, Josep Vehí.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current continuous glucose monitors have limited accuracy mainly in the low range of glucose measurements. This lack of accuracy is a limiting factor in their clinical use and in the development of the so-called artificial pancreas. The ability to detect incorrect readings provided by continuous glucose monitors from raw data and other information supplied by the monitor itself is of utmost clinical importance. In this study, support vector machines (SVMs), a powerful statistical learning technique, were used to detect therapeutically incorrect measurements made by the Medtronic MiniMed CGMS.
METHODS: Twenty patients were monitored for three days (first day at the hospital and two days at home) using the MiniMed CGMS. After the third day, the monitor data were downloaded to the physician's computer. During the first 12 hours, the patients stayed in the hospital, and blood samples were taken every 15 minutes for two hours after meals and every 30 minutes otherwise. Plasma glucose measurements were interpolated using a cubic method for time synchronization with simultaneous MiniMed CGMS measurements every five minutes, obtaining a total of 2281 samples. A Gaussian SVM classifier trained on the monitor's electrical signal and glucose estimation was tuned and validated using multiple runs of k-fold cross-validation. The classes considered were Clarke error grid zones A+B and C+D+E.
RESULTS: After ten runs of ten-fold cross-validation, an average specificity and sensitivity of 92.74% and 75.49%, respectively, were obtained (see Figure 4). The average correct rate was 91.67%.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the SVM performed well, in spite of the somewhat low sensitivity. The classifier was able to detect the time intervals when the monitor's glucose profile could not be trusted due to incorrect measurements. As a result, hypoglycemic episodes missed by the monitor were detected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  continuous glucose monitor; fault detection; statistical learning; support vector machine

Year:  2008        PMID: 19885238      PMCID: PMC2769778          DOI: 10.1177/193229680800200413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  10 in total

1.  A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose.

Authors:  J L Parkes; S L Slatin; S Pardo; B H Ginsberg
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Evaluating the accuracy of continuous glucose-monitoring sensors: continuous glucose-error grid analysis illustrated by TheraSense Freestyle Navigator data.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev; Linda A Gonder-Frederick; Daniel J Cox; William L Clarke
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 3.  Making sense of glucose monitoring technologies: from SMBG to CGM.

Authors:  Roger S Mazze
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  A critical appraisal of the continuous glucose-error grid analysis.

Authors:  Iris M Wentholt; Joost B Hoekstra; J Hans Devries
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Bagging linear sparse Bayesian learning models for variable selection in cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Chuan Lu; Andy Devos; Johan A K Suykens; Carles Arús; Sabine Van Huffel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2007-05

6.  Evaluating the clinical accuracy of two continuous glucose sensors using continuous glucose-error grid analysis.

Authors:  William L Clarke; Stacey Anderson; Leon Farhy; Marc Breton; Linda Gonder-Frederick; Daniel Cox; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  W L Clarke; D Cox; L A Gonder-Frederick; W Carter; S L Pohl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A support vector machines classifier to assess the severity of idiopathic scoliosis from surface topography.

Authors:  Lino Ramirez; Nelson G Durdle; V James Raso; Doug L Hill
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2006-01

10.  Clinical performance of CGMS in type 1 diabetic patients treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using insulin analogs.

Authors:  Bruno Guerci; Michèle Floriot; Philip Böhme; Danielle Durain; Muriel Benichou; Stéphanie Jellimann; Pierre Drouin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 19.112

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Real-time glucose estimation algorithm for continuous glucose monitoring using autoregressive models.

Authors:  Yenny Leal; Winston Garcia-Gabin; Jorge Bondia; Eduardo Esteve; Wifredo Ricart; Jose-Manuel Fernández-Real; Josep Vehí
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-03-01

2.  Continuous glucose monitoring: real-time algorithms for calibration, filtering, and alarms.

Authors:  B Wayne Bequette
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-03-01

3.  Using Momentary Assessment and Machine Learning to Identify Barriers to Self-management in Type 1 Diabetes: Observational Study.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Christopher Fonnesbeck; Douglas C Schmidt; Jules White; Samantha Kleinberg; Shelagh A Mulvaney
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.947

Review 4.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems: A Review.

Authors:  Sandeep Kumar Vashist
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2013-10-29

5.  Application of Hybrid Functional Groups to Predict ATP Binding Proteins.

Authors:  Andreas N Mbah
Journal:  ISRN Comput Biol       Date:  2014-01-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.