Literature DB >> 19882317

Effects of hospital and surgeon volumes on operating times, postoperative complications, and length of stay following laparoscopic colectomy.

Hideo Yasunaga1, Yutaka Matsuyama, Kazuhiko Ohe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A relationship between procedure volume and outcome in colorectal cancer surgery is clearly documented, but there is little information on the volume-outcome association in laparoscopic colectomy. We conducted this study to clarify the effects of hospital volume and surgeon volume on operating times, postoperative complications, and length of stay following laparoscopic colectomy.
METHODS: We conducted a nationwide multicenter survey, targeting surgical centers registered with the Japan Surgical Society. Using Web-based patient registration, we collected data on patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy between November 1, 2006 and February 28, 2007. Operating times, postoperative complications, and length of stay were independently regressed against hospital and surgeon volumes, patient backgrounds, and details of surgical procedures, using multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: We analyzed data from 1212 patients at 247 hospitals. The odds ratios for operating times in the surgeon-volume groups with 30-99, 100-199, or >or=200 surgical procedures were 0.47, 0.23, and 0.17, respectively, versus a reference group with <30 procedures. Neither surgeon volume nor hospital volume was significantly associated with the incidence of postoperative complications. Shorter stay was significantly associated with hospital volume, but not with surgeon volume.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of data related to laparoscopic colectomy revealed that surgeons' experience was associated with faster surgery, but not necessarily with reduced operative morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19882317     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-008-4052-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  25 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Mark Radzyner; David Rubin; James Dougherty; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies.

Authors:  C L Bennett; S J Stryker; M R Ferreira; J Adams; R W Beart
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-01

4.  Hospital and surgeon procedure volume as predictors of outcome following rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  Deborah Schrag; Katherine S Panageas; Elyn Riedel; Laura D Cramer; Jose G Guillem; Peter B Bach; Colin B Begg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Laparoscopic colectomy versus open colectomy for colorectal carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of patients followed up for at least 4 years.

Authors:  Masayuki Kojima; Fumio Konishi; Masaki Okada; Hideo Nagai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Hospital procedure volume and teaching status do not influence treatment and outcome measures of rectal cancer surgery in a large general population.

Authors:  M Simunovic; T To; N Baxter; A Balshem; E Ross; Z Cohen; R McLeod; P Engstrom; E Sigurdson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the rectum resected by laparoscopic surgery: report of a case.

Authors:  Takatoshi Nakamura; Atsushi Ihara; Hiroyuki Mitomi; Yukihito Kokuba; Takeo Sato; Heita Ozawa; Kazuhiko Hatade; Wataru Onozato; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Impact of hospital procedure volume on surgical operation and long-term outcomes in high-risk curatively resected rectal cancer: findings from the Intergroup 0114 Study.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Joel E Tepper; Donna Niedzwiecki; Donna R Hollis; Deborah Schrag; John Z Ayanian; Michael J O'Connell; Jane C Weeks; Robert J Mayer; Christopher G Willett; John S MacDonald; Al B Benson; Charles S Fuchs
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Are high-volume surgeons and hospitals the most important predictors of in-hospital outcome for colon cancer resection?

Authors:  Clifford Y Ko; John T Chang; Saima Chaudhry; Gerald Kominski
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  9 in total

1.  Trends in the treatment outcomes for advanced colorectal cancer: an analysis at a single community hospital in Japan.

Authors:  Morimasa Tomikawa; Daisuke Korenaga; Tomohiko Akahoshi; Kenichi Kohshi; Keishi Sugimachi; Yasuharu Ikeda; Kenji Takenaka; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Systematic review and a meta-analysis of hospital and surgeon volume/outcome relationships in colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Ya Ruth Huo; Kevin Phan; David L Morris; Winston Liauw
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06

3.  The role of caseload in determining outcome following laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection: an observational study.

Authors:  Elaine M Burns; Ravikrishna Mamidanna; Andy Currie; Alex Bottle; Paul Aylin; Ara Darzi; Omar D Faiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic colectomy significantly decreases length of stay compared with open operation.

Authors:  Amalia J Stefanou; Craig A Reickert; Vic Velanovich; Anthony Falvo; Ilan Rubinfeld
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Right versus left laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: does side make any difference?

Authors:  Juan P Campana; Pablo A Pellegrini; Gustavo L Rossi; Guillermo Ojea Quintana; Ricardo E Mentz; Carlos A Vaccaro
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Relationship between hospital volume and hemorrhagic complication after percutaneous renal biopsy: results from the Japanese diagnosis procedure combination database.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Hideki Hashimoto; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Hideo Yasunaga
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 2.801

7.  Variation in cancer surgical outcomes associated with physician and nurse staffing: a retrospective observational study using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database.

Authors:  Hideo Yasunaga; Hideki Hashimoto; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Hiroaki Miyata; Shinya Matsuda
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Influence of Individual Surgeon Volume on Oncological Outcome of Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Marleen Buurma; Hidde M Kroon; Marlies S Reimers; Peter A Neijenhuis
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-09-03

9.  Impact of surgeon and hospital factors on length of stay after colorectal surgery systematic review.

Authors:  Zubair Bayat; Keegan Guidolin; Basheer Elsolh; Charmaine De Castro; Erin Kennedy; Anand Govindarajan
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-09-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.