Ya Ruth Huo1,2, Kevin Phan3,4, David L Morris1,2, Winston Liauw2,5. 1. Hepatobiliary and Surgical Oncology Unit, UNSW Department of Surgery, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia. 2. Faculty of Medicine, St George Clinical School, UNSW Australia, Kensington, NSW, Australia. 3. NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group (NSURG), Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia. 4. Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 5. Cancer Care Centre, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Numerous hospitals worldwide are considering setting minimum volume standards for colorectal surgery. This study aims to examine the association between hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for colorectal surgery. METHODS: Two investigators independently reviewed six databases from inception to May 2016 for articles that reported outcomes according to hospital and/or surgeon volume. Eligible studies included those in which assessed the association hospital or surgeon volume with outcomes for the surgical treatment of colon and/or rectal cancer. Random effects models were used to pool the hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between hospital/surgeon volume with outcomes. RESULTS: There were 47 articles pooled (1,122,303 patients, 9,877 hospitals and 9,649 surgeons). The meta-analysis demonstrated that there is a volume-outcome relationship that favours high volume facilities and high volume surgeons. Higher hospital and surgeon volume resulted in reduced 30-day mortality (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.78-0.87, P<0.001 & HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.80-0.89, P<0.001 respectively) and intra-operative mortality (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.76-0.86, P<0.001 & HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.40-0.62, P<0.001 respectively). Post-operative complication rates depended on hospital volume (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.81-0.98, P<0.05), but not surgeon volume except with respect to anastomotic leak (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.37-0.94, P<0.01). High volume surgeons are associated with greater 5-year survival and greater lymph node retrieval, whilst reducing recurrence rates, operative time, length of stay and cost. The best outcomes occur in high volume hospitals with high volume surgeons, followed by low volume hospitals with high volume surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: High volume by surgeon and high volume by hospital are associated with better outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery. However, this relationship is non-linear with no clear threshold of effect being identified and an apparent ceiling of effect.
BACKGROUND: Numerous hospitals worldwide are considering setting minimum volume standards for colorectal surgery. This study aims to examine the association between hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for colorectal surgery. METHODS: Two investigators independently reviewed six databases from inception to May 2016 for articles that reported outcomes according to hospital and/or surgeon volume. Eligible studies included those in which assessed the association hospital or surgeon volume with outcomes for the surgical treatment of colon and/or rectal cancer. Random effects models were used to pool the hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between hospital/surgeon volume with outcomes. RESULTS: There were 47 articles pooled (1,122,303 patients, 9,877 hospitals and 9,649 surgeons). The meta-analysis demonstrated that there is a volume-outcome relationship that favours high volume facilities and high volume surgeons. Higher hospital and surgeon volume resulted in reduced 30-day mortality (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.78-0.87, P<0.001 & HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.80-0.89, P<0.001 respectively) and intra-operative mortality (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.76-0.86, P<0.001 & HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.40-0.62, P<0.001 respectively). Post-operative complication rates depended on hospital volume (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.81-0.98, P<0.05), but not surgeon volume except with respect to anastomotic leak (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.37-0.94, P<0.01). High volume surgeons are associated with greater 5-year survival and greater lymph node retrieval, whilst reducing recurrence rates, operative time, length of stay and cost. The best outcomes occur in high volume hospitals with high volume surgeons, followed by low volume hospitals with high volume surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: High volume by surgeon and high volume by hospital are associated with better outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery. However, this relationship is non-linear with no clear threshold of effect being identified and an apparent ceiling of effect.
Authors: S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; K Hur; M Hossain; D Soybel; K W Kizer; J B Aust; R H Bell; V Chong; J Demakis; P J Fabri; J O Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G McDonald; E Passaro; L Phillips; F Scamman; J Spencer; J F Stremple Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-04-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Deborah Schrag; Katherine S Panageas; Elyn Riedel; Laura D Cramer; Jose G Guillem; Peter B Bach; Colin B Begg Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: J Engel; J Kerr; R Eckel; B Günther; M Heiss; W Heitland; J R Siewert; K-W Jauch; D Hölzel Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: M Simunovic; T To; N Baxter; A Balshem; E Ross; Z Cohen; R McLeod; P Engstrom; E Sigurdson Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2000 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Nikki E Kolfschoten; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen; Michel W J M Wouters; Eric-Hans Eddes; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Theo Stijnen; Job Kievit Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jennie K Lee; Aristithes G Doumouras; Jeremy E Springer; Cagla Eskicioglu; Nalin Amin; Margherita Cadeddu; Dennis Hong Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Patrick Higgins; Tamas Nemeth; Fadel Bennani; Waqar Khan; Iqbal Khan; Ronan Waldron; Kevin Barry Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Natalie J Del Vecchio; Jennifer A Schlichting; Catherine Chioreso; Amanda R Kahl; Jennifer E Hrabe; Charles F Lynch; Michele M West; Mary E Charlton Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Jennifer Bergstrom; Alessia Aloisi; Shannon Armbruster; Ting-Tai Yen; Jvan Casarin; Mario M Leitao; Edward J Tanner; Rayna Matsuno; Karime Kalil Machado; Sean C Dowdy; Pamela T Soliman; Stephanie L Wethington; Rebecca L Stone; Kimberly L Levinson; Amanda N Fader Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Xiang Gao; Kristin S Weeks; Irena Gribovskaja-Rupp; Imran Hassan; Marcia M Ward; Mary E Charlton Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2020-10-10 Impact factor: 2.192