Literature DB >> 19864512

Impact of heart rate frequency and variability on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance in dual-source spiral CT coronary angiography.

Annick C Weustink1, Lisanne A Neefjes, Stamatis Kyrzopoulos, Marcel van Straten, Rick Neoh Eu, Willem B Meijboom, Carlos A van Mieghem, Ermanno Capuano, Marcel L Dijkshoorn, Filippo Cademartiri, Eric Boersma, Pim J de Feyter, Gabriel P Krestin, Nico R Mollet.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of heart rate frequency (HRF) and heart rate variability (HRV) on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance to help detect significant stenosis (> or =50% lumen diameter reduction) by using adaptive electrocardiographic (ECG) pulsing at dual-source (DS) spiral computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review committee approval and informed consent were obtained. No prescan beta-blockers were applied. Unenhanced CT and CT coronary angiography with adaptive ECG pulsing were performed in 927 consecutive patients (600 men, 327 women; mean age, 60.3 years +/- 11.0 [standard deviation]) divided in three HRF groups: low, intermediate, and high (< or =65, 66-79, and > or =80 beats/min, respectively), and four HRV groups given mean interbeat difference (IBD) during CT coronary angiography: normal, minor, moderate, and severe (IBDs of 0-1, 2-3, 4-10, and >10, respectively). Radiation exposure and image quality were also evaluated. In 444 of these, diagnostic performance was presented as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals by using quantitative coronary angiography as the reference standard.
RESULTS: CT coronary angiography yielded good image quality in 98% of patients and no significant differences in image quality were found among HRF and HRV groups. Radiation exposure was significantly higher in patients with low versus high HRF and in patients with severe versus normal HRV. No significant differences among HRF and HRV groups in image quality and diagnostic performance were found. A nonsignificant trend was found toward a lower specificity and PPV in patients with a high HRF or severe HRV when compared with low HRF or normal HRV in patients with a low calcium score (Agatston score <100).
CONCLUSION: DS spiral CT coronary angiography performed with adaptive ECG pulsing results in preserved diagnostic image quality and performance independent of HRF or HRV at the cost of limited dose reduction in arrhythmic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19864512     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2533090358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  25 in total

1.  Iterative reconstruction of dual-source coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality and radiation dose.

Authors:  Eun-Ah Park; Whal Lee; Kwang Woo Kim; Kwang Gi Kim; Allmendinger Thomas; Jin Wook Chung; Jae Hyung Park
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Assessment of global function of left ventricle with dual-source CT in patients with severe arrhythmia: a comparison with the use of two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography.

Authors:  Song Soo Kim; Sung Min Ko; Meong Gun Song; Joon Suk Kim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of the whole aorta without ECG synchronisation: initial experience.

Authors:  Martin Beeres; Boris Schell; Aristidis Mastragelopoulos; Eva Herrmann; Josef Matthias Kerl; Tatjana Gruber-Rouh; Clara Lee; Petra Siebenhandl; Boris Bodelle; Stephan Zangos; Thomas J Vogl; Volkmar Jacobi; Ralf W Bauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Evaluation of complex congenital heart disease in infants using low dose cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Jannika Dodge-Khatami; Dilachew A Adebo
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  320-detector row CT coronary angiography: effects of heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality, diagnostic accuracy and radiation exposure.

Authors:  G Sun; M Li; X-S Jiang; L Li; Z-H Peng; G-Y Li; L Xu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Superior CT coronary angiography image quality at lower radiation exposure with second generation 320-detector row CT in patients with elevated heart rate: a comparison with first generation 320-detector row CT.

Authors:  Dennis T L Wong; Siang Y Soh; Brian S H Ko; James D Cameron; Marcus Crossett; Arthur Nasis; John Troupis; Ian T Meredith; Sujith K Seneviratne
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-08

7.  Effect of Tube Voltage (100 vs. 120 kVp) on Radiation Dose and Image Quality using Prospective Gating 320 Row Multi-detector Computed Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Atif N Khan; Faisal Khosa; Waqas Shuaib; Khurram Nasir; Ron Blankstein; Melvin Clouse
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2013-12-31

Review 8.  Meta-analysis: diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG gating based on step-and-shoot, Flash and volume modes for detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Linfeng Yang; Tao Zhou; Ruijie Zhang; Lin Xu; Zhaohui Peng; Juan Ding; Sen Wang; Min Li; Gang Sun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Application of low-dose dual-source computed tomography angiography in children with complex congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Xian-Feng Chen; Fan Jiang; Lin Li; Yan Chen; Xin Chen; Yan-Yan Jiang; Li Xiang; Xiao-Jing Ma
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Diagnostic quality of dual-source coronary CT examinations performed without heart rate control: importance of obesity and heart rate on image quality.

Authors:  Stefan L Zimmerman; Brian G Kral; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.